Credit to OSS-Fuzz for finding this.
CVE-2017-3738
(Imported from upstream's 5630661aecbea5fe3c4740f5fea744a1f07a6253 and
77d75993651b63e872244a3256e37967bb3c3e9e.)
Confirmed with Intel SDE that the fix makes the test vector pass and
that, without the fix, the test vector does not. (Well, we knew the
latter already, since it was our test vector.)
Change-Id: I167aa3407ddab3b434bacbd18e099c55aa40ac4c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23884
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Imported from upstream's a78324d95bd4568ce2c3b34bfa1d6f14cddf92ef. I
think the "regression" part of that change is some tweak to BN_usub and
I guess the bn_*_words was to compensate for it, but we may as well
import it. Apparently the loop instruction is terrible.
Before:
Did 39871000 bn_add_words operations in 1000002us (39870920.3 ops/sec)
Did 38621750 bn_sub_words operations in 1000001us (38621711.4 ops/sec)
After:
Did 64012000 bn_add_words operations in 1000007us (64011551.9 ops/sec)
Did 81792250 bn_sub_words operations in 1000002us (81792086.4 ops/sec)
loop sets no flags (even doing the comparison to zero without ZF) while
dec sets all flags but CF, so Andres and I are assuming that because
this prevents Intel from microcoding it to dec/jnz, they otherwise can't
be bothered to add more circuitry since every compiler has internalized
by now to never use loop.
Change-Id: I3927cd1c7b707841bbe9963e3d4afd7ba9bd9b36
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23344
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also replace a pointless call to bn_mul_words with a memset.
Change-Id: Ief30ddab0e84864561b73fe2776bd0477931cf7f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23066
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Credit to OSS-Fuzz for finding this.
CVE-2017-3736
(Imported from upstream's 668a709a8d7ea374ee72ad2d43ac72ec60a80eee and
420b88cec8c6f7c67fad07bf508dcccab094f134.)
This bug does not affect BoringSSL as we do not enable the ADX code.
Note the test vector had to be tweaked to take things in and out of
Montgomery form. (There may be something to be said for test vectors for
just BN_mod_mul_montgomery, though we'd need separate 64-bit and 32-bit
ones because R can be different.)
Change-Id: I832070731ac1c5f893f9c1746892fc4a32f023f5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22484
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This partially reverts commit 38636aba74.
Some build on Android seems to break now. I'm not really sure what the
situation is, but if the weird common symbols are still there (can we
remove them?), they probably ought to have the right flags.
Change-Id: Ief589d763d16b995ac6be536505acf7596a87b30
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22404
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commit f6942f0d22.
Reason for revert: This doesn't actually work in clang-cl. I
forgot we didn't have the clang-cl try bots enabled! :-( I
believe __asm__ is still okay, but I'll try it by hand
tomorrow.
Original change's description:
> Use uint128_t and __asm__ in clang-cl.
>
> clang-cl does not define __GNUC__ but is still a functioning clang. We
> should be able to use our uint128_t and __asm__ code in it on Windows.
>
> Change-Id: I67310ee68baa0c0c947b2441c265b019ef12af7e
> Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22184
> Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TBR=agl@google.com,davidben@google.com
Change-Id: I5c7e0391cd9c2e8cc0dfde37e174edaf5d17db22
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22224
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
clang-cl does not define __GNUC__ but is still a functioning clang. We
should be able to use our uint128_t and __asm__ code in it on Windows.
Change-Id: I67310ee68baa0c0c947b2441c265b019ef12af7e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22184
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Our assembly does not use the GOT to reference symbols, which means
references to visible symbols will often require a TEXTREL. This is
undesirable, so all assembly-referenced symbols should be hidden. CPU
capabilities are the only such symbols defined in C.
These symbols may be hidden by doing at least one of:
1. Build with -fvisibility=hidden
2. __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) in C.
3. .extern + .hidden in some assembly file referencing the symbol.
We have lots of consumers and can't always rely on (1) happening. We
were doing (3) by way of d216b71f90 and
16e38b2b8f, but missed 32-bit x86 because
it doesn't cause a linker error.
Those two patches are not in upstream. Upstream instead does (3) by way
of x86cpuid.pl and friends, but we have none of these files.
Standardize on doing (2). This avoids accidentally getting TEXTRELs on
some 32-bit x86 build configurations. This also undoes
d216b71f90 and
16e38b2b8f. They are no now longer needed
and reduce the upstream diff.
Change-Id: Ib51c43fce6a7d8292533635e5d85d3c197a93644
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22064
Commit-Queue: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
One less macro to worry about in bcm.c.
Change-Id: I321084c0d4ed1bec38c541b04f5b3468350c6eaa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19565
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
crypto/{asn1,x509,x509v3,pem} were skipped as they are still OpenSSL
style.
Change-Id: I3cd9a60e1cb483a981aca325041f3fbce294247c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19504
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Using ADX instructions requires relatively new assemblers. Conscrypt are
currently using Yasm 1.2.0. Revert these for the time being to unbreak
their build.
Change-Id: Iaba5761ccedcafaffb5ca79a8eaf7fa565583c32
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19244
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a reland of https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18965
which was reverted due to Windows toolchain problems that have since
been fixed.
We have an SDE bot now and can more easily test things. We also enabled
ADX in rsaz-avx2.pl which does not work without x86_64-mont*.pl enabled.
rsa-avx2.pl's ADX code only turns itself off so that the faster ADX code
can be used... but we disable it.
Verified, after reverting the fix, the test vectors we imported combined
with Intel SDE catches CVE-2016-7055, so we do indeed have test
coverage. Also verified on the Windows version of Intel SDE.
Thanks to Alexey Ivanov for pointing out the discrepancy.
Skylake numbers:
Before:
Did 7296 RSA 2048 signing operations in 10038191us (726.8 ops/sec)
Did 209000 RSA 2048 verify operations in 10030629us (20836.2 ops/sec)
Did 1080 RSA 4096 signing operations in 10072221us (107.2 ops/sec)
Did 60836 RSA 4096 verify operations in 10053929us (6051.0 ops/sec)
ADX consistently off:
Did 9360 RSA 2048 signing operations in 10025823us (933.6 ops/sec)
Did 220000 RSA 2048 verify operations in 10024339us (21946.6 ops/sec)
Did 1048 RSA 4096 signing operations in 10006782us (104.7 ops/sec)
Did 61936 RSA 4096 verify operations in 10088011us (6139.6 ops/sec)
After (ADX consistently on):
Did 10444 RSA 2048 signing operations in 10006781us (1043.7 ops/sec)
Did 323000 RSA 2048 verify operations in 10012192us (32260.7 ops/sec)
Did 1610 RSA 4096 signing operations in 10044930us (160.3 ops/sec)
Did 96000 RSA 4096 verify operations in 10075606us (9528.0 ops/sec)
Change-Id: I2502ce80e9cfcdea40907512682e3a6663000faa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19105
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This reverts commit 83d1a3d3c8.
Reason for revert: Our Windows setup can't handle these instructions.
Will investigate tomorrow, possibly by turning ADX off on Windows.
Change-Id: I378fc0906c59b9bac9da17a33ba8280c70fdc995
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19004
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We have an SDE bot now and can more easily test things. We also enabled
ADX in rsaz-avx2.pl which does not work without x86_64-mont*.pl enabled.
rsa-avx2.pl's ADX code only turns itself off so that the faster ADX code
can be used... but we disable it.
Verified, after reverting the fix, the test vectors we imported combined
with Intel SDE catches CVE-2016-7055, so we do indeed have test
coverage.
Thanks to Alexey Ivanov for pointing out the discrepancy.
Skylake numbers:
Before:
Did 7296 RSA 2048 signing operations in 10038191us (726.8 ops/sec)
Did 209000 RSA 2048 verify operations in 10030629us (20836.2 ops/sec)
Did 1080 RSA 4096 signing operations in 10072221us (107.2 ops/sec)
Did 60836 RSA 4096 verify operations in 10053929us (6051.0 ops/sec)
ADX consistently off:
Did 9360 RSA 2048 signing operations in 10025823us (933.6 ops/sec)
Did 220000 RSA 2048 verify operations in 10024339us (21946.6 ops/sec)
Did 1048 RSA 4096 signing operations in 10006782us (104.7 ops/sec)
Did 61936 RSA 4096 verify operations in 10088011us (6139.6 ops/sec)
After (ADX consistently on):
Did 10444 RSA 2048 signing operations in 10006781us (1043.7 ops/sec)
Did 323000 RSA 2048 verify operations in 10012192us (32260.7 ops/sec)
Did 1610 RSA 4096 signing operations in 10044930us (160.3 ops/sec)
Did 96000 RSA 4096 verify operations in 10075606us (9528.0 ops/sec)
Change-Id: Icbbd4f06dde60d1a42a691c511b34c47b9a2da5f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18965
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change was made by copying over the files as of that commit and
then discarding the parts of the diff which corresponding to our own
changes.
Change-Id: I28c5d711f7a8cec30749b8174687434129af5209
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17111
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Close difference gap on Cortex-A9, which resulted in further improvement
even on other processors.
(Imported from upstream's 8eed3289b21d25583ed44742db43a2d727b79643.)
Performance numbers on a Nexus 5X in AArch32 mode:
$ ./bssl.old speed -filter RSA -timeout 5
Did 355 RSA 2048 signing operations in 5009578us (70.9 ops/sec)
Did 20577 RSA 2048 verify operations in 5079000us (4051.4 ops/sec)
Did 66 RSA 4096 signing operations in 5057941us (13.0 ops/sec)
Did 5564 RSA 4096 verify operations in 5086902us (1093.8 ops/sec)
$ ./bssl speed -filter RSA -timeout 5
Did 411 RSA 2048 signing operations in 5010206us (82.0 ops/sec)
Did 27720 RSA 2048 verify operations in 5048114us (5491.2 ops/sec)
Did 86 RSA 4096 signing operations in 5056160us (17.0 ops/sec)
Did 8216 RSA 4096 verify operations in 5048719us (1627.3 ops/sec)
Change-Id: I8c5be9ff9405ec1796dcf4cfe7df8a89e5a50ce5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17109
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As some of ARM processors, more specifically Cortex-Mx series, are
Thumb2-only, we need to support Thumb2-only builds even in assembly.
(Imported from upstream's 11208dcfb9105e8afa37233185decefd45e89e17.)
Change-Id: I7cb48ce6a842cf3cfdf553f6e6e6227d52d525c0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17108
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
43e5a26b53 removed the .file directive
from x86asm.pl. This removes the parameter from asm_init altogether. See
also upstream's e195c8a2562baef0fdcae330556ed60b1e922b0e.
Change-Id: I65761bc962d09f9210661a38ecf6df23eae8743d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16247
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I forgot to scrub these files when they moved and their macros are
currently leaking into other files. This isn't a problem, but does
prevent ec/ code from being moved into the module at the moment.
Change-Id: I5433fb043e90a03ae3dc5c38cb3a69563aada007
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15845
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
