Add a dedicated error code to the queue for a handshake_failure alert in
response to ClientHello. This matches NSS's client behavior and gives a better
error on a (probable) failure to negotiate initial parameters.
BUG=https://crbug.com/446505
Change-Id: I34368712085a6cbf0031902daf2c00393783d96d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2751
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ERR_get_error returns the least recent error, not the most recent error.
Nothing in err_test was actually asserting on that.
Change-Id: Ia49e29c231de4bbec77d037860ad1ffa8cce4779
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2750
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
One about a possible uninitialised variable (incorrect, but it's easier
to keep the compiler happy) and one warning about "const static" being
backwards.
Change-Id: Ic5976a5f0b48f32e09682e31b65d8ea1c27e5b88
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2632
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since this is C89 we need to maintain this ancient practice.
Change-Id: I7223e7c38a35cf551b6e3c9159d2e21ebf7e62be
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2631
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's a static function anyway so it doesn't affect anything and it's
colliding with a debugging function on one platform.
Change-Id: Iae0595cce7cb2bdd4c56217f6f1de51ff3134a8b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2630
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The expectation when calling HMAC with key=NULL and keylen=0 is to compute
HMAC on the provided data with a key of length 0 instead of using the
"previous" key, which in the case of HMAC() is whatever bytes happen to be
left on the stack when the HMAC_CTX struct is allocated.
Change-Id: I52a95e262ee4e15f1af3136cb9c07f42f40ce122
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2660
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It doesn't retain partial blocks but it DOES update internal cipher state. ssl/
depends on this property.
Change-Id: I1e44b612c2e1549e096de8b71726007dcbc68de3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2640
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |skip_message| variable was overly complex and, since we have at
least 32-bit ints, we know that a 24-bit value doesn't overflow an int.
Change-Id: I5c16fa979e1716f39cc47882c033bcf5bce3284c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2610
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RAND_pseudo_bytes just calls RAND_bytes now and only returns 0 or 1. Switch all
callers within the library call the new one and use the simpler failure check.
This fixes a few error checks that no longer work (< 0) and some missing ones.
Change-Id: Id51c79deec80075949f73fa1fbd7b76aac5570c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2621
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
No current use of ssl_cert_type passes a NULL EVP_PKEY, so it can be simplified
a little.
Change-Id: I2052cc3b6069cd30e4685ba8a6d0014016a4d712
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2620
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Currently we don't express an opinion. Most sites aren't likely to have a
choice since it depends on what certificates they have available. But we may as
well order them.
Change-Id: I4fffa5e392f42e19823cb8faa2e9e15a6bb91086
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2607
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Turns out the EVP_CIPH_FLAG_CUSTOM_CIPHER ciphers (i.e. legacy EVP_CIPHER
AES-GCM) have a completely different return value setup than the normal ones
which are the standard one/zero. (Except that they never return zero; see
TODO.)
Fix checks in ssl/ and remove remnants of EVP_CIPH_FLAG_CUSTOM_CIPHER in ssl/
as we're using EVP_AEAD now.
See CHANGES entry added in upstream's 3da0ca796cae6625bd26418afe0a1dc47bf5a77f.
Change-Id: Ia4d0ff59b03c35fab3a08141c60b9534cb7172e2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2606
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Those version checks are if renego tried to change the version, but at that
point we're out of the initial null cipher and should leave the version fixed.
(On the server end, the code in question was dead after the version negotiation
rewrite anyway.)
Change-Id: I3242ba11bc9981ccf7fdb867176d59846cc49dd9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2605
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This avoids needing a should_add_to_finished_hash boolean on do_write. The
logic in do_write was a little awkward because do_write would be called
multiple times if the write took several iterations. This also gets complex if
DTLS retransmits are involved. (At a glance, it's not obvious the
BIO_CTRL_DGRAM_MTU_EXCEEDED case actually works.)
Doing it as the handshake message is being prepared avoids this concern. It
also gives a natural point for the extended master secret logic which needs to
do work after the finished hash has been sampled.
As a bonus, we can remove s->d1->retransmitting which was only used to deal
with this issue.
Change-Id: Ifedf23ee4a6c5e08f960d296a6eb1f337a16dc7a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2604
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
That comment is wrong as of TLS 1.2.
Change-Id: I900d5efc09d7468f2601d85f867833e43d046f6a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2603
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Or should we just drop this? It only matters for servers trying to use client
auth.)
Change-Id: I50b6999375dc8f9246bf617f17929ae304503c57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2602
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some of the messages did the computation manually which would bite us if we
tried to transplant them between DTLS and TLS. More importantly, it precludes
moving the handshake hash computation from ssl_do_write to
ssl_set_handshake_header.
Change-Id: I9d400deb0720e62cb1ab905242eb0679ad650a46
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2600
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The frag_off/frag_len parameters are always zero, and the return value is never
used.
Change-Id: If7487b23c55f2a996e411b25b76a8e1651f25d8b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2601
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change has no semantic effect (I hope!). It's just a reformatting
of a few files in ssl/. This is just a start – the other files in ssl/
should follow in the coming days.
Change-Id: I5eb3f4b18d0d46349d0f94d3fe5ab2003db5364e
David is heading out so I didn't want to block the previous batch of
changes for weeks. Thus I landed them as-is and this change tweaks a
couple of things that would normally have been addressed in code-review.
Change-Id: I2579dbc43d93fea34a52b4041f5511d70217aaf7
Ensure that both the client and the server emit a protocol_version alert
(except in SSLv3 where it doesn't exist) with a record-layer version which the
peer will recognize.
Change-Id: I31650a64fe9b027ff3d51e303711910a00b43d6f
This makes SSLv23_method go through DTLS_ANY_VERSION's version negotiation
logic. This allows us to get rid of duplicate ClientHello logic. For
compatibility, SSL_METHOD is now split into SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD and a version.
The legacy version-locked methods set min_version and max_version based this
version field to emulate the original semantics.
As a bonus, we can now handle fragmented ClientHello versions now.
Because SSLv23_method is a silly name, deprecate that too and introduce
TLS_method.
Change-Id: I8b3df2b427ae34c44ecf972f466ad64dc3dbb171
Tested manually by replacing SSLv23_method() with TLSv1_2_method() in
bssl_shim. This is a large chunk of code which is not run in SSLv23_method(),
but it will be run after unification. It's split out separately to ease review.
Change-Id: I6bd241daca17aa0f9b3e36e51864a29755a41097
Match the DTLS code. Rather than sniffing the handshake state, use the
have_version bit.
Change-Id: I40e92f187647417c34b4cfdc3ad258f5562e781b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2588
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These tests use both APIs. This also modifies the inline version negotiation's
error codes (currently only used for DTLS) to align with SSLv23's error codes.
Note: the peer should send a protocol_version alert which is currently untested
because it's broken.
Upstream would send such an alert if TLS 1.0 was supported but not otherwise,
which is somewhat bizarre. We've actually regressed and never send the alert in
SSLv23. When version negotiation is unified, we'll get the alerts back.
Change-Id: I4c77bcef3a3cd54a039a642f189785cd34387410
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2584
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Amend the version negotiation tests to test this new spelling of max_version.
min_version will be tested in a follow-up.
Change-Id: Ic4bfcd43bc4e5f951140966f64bb5fd3e2472b01
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2583
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
DTLS_method() can now negotiate versions without switching methods.
Change-Id: I0655b3221b6e7e4b3ed4acc45f1f41c594447021
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2582
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL3_ENC_METHOD will remain version-specific while SSL_METHOD will become
protocol-specific. This finally removes all the version-specific portions of
SSL_METHOD but the version tag itself.
(SSL3_ENC_METHOD's version-specific bits themselves can probably be handled by
tracking a canonicalized protocol version. It would simplify version
comparisons anyway. The one catch is SSLv3 has a very different table. But
that's a cleanup for future. Then again, perhaps a version-specific method
table swap somewhere will be useful later for TLS 1.3.)
Much of this commit was generated with sed invocation:
s/method->ssl3_enc/enc_method/g
Change-Id: I2b192507876aadd4f9310240687e562e56e6c0b1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2581
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Now SSLv23 and DTLS_ANY_VERSION share version-related helper functions.
ssl3_get_method is temporary until the method switch is no longer necessary.
Put them all together so there's one place to refactor them when we add a new
version or implement min_version/max_version controls.
Change-Id: Ic28a145cad22db08a87fdb854480b22886c451c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2580
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Missed this one. It requires that we be able to change an SSL_METHOD after the
after, which complicates compiling the version locking into min_version /
max_version configurations.
Change-Id: I24ba54b7939360bbfafe3feb355a65840bda7611
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2579
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_ST_BEFORE isn't a possible state anymore. It seems this state meant the
side wasn't known, back in the early SSLeay days. Now upstream guesses
(sometimes incorrectly with generic methods), and we don't initialize until
later. SSL_shutdown also doesn't bother to call ssl3_shutdown at all if the
side isn't initialized and SSL_ST_BEFORE isn't the uninitialized state, which
seems a much more sensible arrangement.
Likewise, because bare SSL_ST_BEFOREs no longer exist, SSL_in_init implies
SSL_in_before and there is no need to check both.
Change-Id: Ie680838b2f860b895073dabb4d759996e21c2824
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These may as well be replaced with assertions. Get them out of the way of the
initialization.
Change-Id: Ie4ab8bdc018e4a1def7d3f6b3b172a77896bfc0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2563
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They're always known now. Also fix the SSLv23_{client,server}_method
definitions still had their own macro invocations.
Change-Id: Ia13f29a27f2331d25a4051e83f2d5abc62fab981
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2562
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's an undefined one not used anywhere. The others ought to be const. Also
move the forward declaration to ssl.h so we don't have to use the struct name.
Change-Id: I76684cf65255535c677ec19154cac74317c289ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2561
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
else block got lost in a rewrite of this code.
Change-Id: I51f1655474ec8bbd4eccb4297124e8584329444e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2560
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The client_version needs to be preserved, both for the RSA key exchange and
(when this codepath is used for TLS) for the SChannel renego workaround. Fix
the tests to enforce this so the cipher suite version tests catch this.
Change-Id: I0c42dc3ec4830f3724026b400e5066e7a7f1ee97
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2551
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's no need to make that conditional.
Change-Id: Idac1aba42b22e3fe8e7731ae4ecb5ebc4183336c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2550
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Comparing data is a much easier idiom than CBS_skip + a CBS_len check.
Change-Id: I3efe925734c76f3494cad682445291ae83750a7e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2500
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The record-layer version of the ServerHello should match the final version. The
record-layer version of the ClientHello should be the advertised version, but
clamped at TLS 1.0. This is to ensure future rewrites do not regress this.
Change-Id: I96f1f0674944997ff38b562453a322ce61652635
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2540
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Bruce Dawson pointed out that the shadowing of |ret| in |s3_srvr.c|
looked dodgy. It was actually deliberate (we don't want to reset the
default value of the function's |ret| variable with a successful return
from the callback) but it does look dodgy.
This change adds -Wshadow to ban variable shadowing and fixes all
current instances.
Change-Id: I1268f88b9f26245c7d16d6ead5bb9014ea471c01
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2520
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
