Although those are only created by code owned by RSA_METHOD, custom RSA_METHODs
shouldn't be allowed to squat our internal fields and then change how you free
things.
Remove 'method' from their names now that they're not method-specific.
Change-Id: I9494ef9a7754ad59ac9fba7fd463b3336d826e0b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6423
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This restores the original semantics of the finished hook.
Change-Id: I70da393c7e66fb6e3be1e2511e08b34bb54fc0b4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6422
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Having a single RSA_METHOD means they all get pulled in. Notably, RSA key
generation pulls in the primality-checking code.
Change-Id: Iece480113754da090ddf87b64d8769f01e05d26c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6389
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This will allow a static linker (with -ffunction-sections since things aren't
split into files) to drop unused parts of DH and DSA. Notably, the parameter
generation bits pull in primality-checking code.
Change-Id: I25087e4cb91bc9d0ab43bcb267c2e2c164e56b59
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6388
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Removing the function codes continued to sample __func__ for compatibility with
ERR_print_errors_cb, but not ERR_error_string_n. We can just emit
OPENSSL_internal for both. ERR_print_errors_cb already has the file and line
number available which is strictly more information than the function name.
(ERR_error_string_n does not, but we'd already turned that to
OPENSSL_internal.)
This shaves 100kb from a release build of the bssl tool.
In doing so, put an unused function code parameter back into ERR_put_error to
align with OpenSSL. We don't need to pass an additional string in anymore, so
OpenSSL compatibility with anything which uses ERR_LIB_USER or
ERR_get_next_error_library costs nothing. (Not that we need it.)
Change-Id: If6af34628319ade4145190b6f30a0d820e00b20d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6387
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
MSVC unhelpfuly says: warning C4146: unary minus operator applied to
unsigned type, result still unsigned.
Change-Id: Ia1e6b9fc415908920abb1bcd98fc7f7a5670c2c7
This change incorporates Intel's P-256 implementation. The record of
Intel's submission under CLA is in internal bug number 25330687.
Before:
Did 3582 ECDH P-256 operations in 1049114us (3414.3 ops/sec)
Did 8525 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 1028778us (8286.5 ops/sec)
Did 3487 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 1008996us (3455.9 ops/sec)
build/tool/bssl is 1434704 bytes after strip -s
After:
Did 8618 ECDH P-256 operations in 1027884us (8384.2 ops/sec)
Did 21000 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 1049490us (20009.7 ops/sec)
Did 8268 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 1079481us (7659.2 ops/sec)
build/tool/bssl is 1567216 bytes after strip -s
Change-Id: I147971a8e19849779c8ed7e20310d41bd4962299
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6371
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This option causes clients to ignore HelloRequest messages completely.
This can be suitable in cases where a server tries to perform concurrent
application data and handshake flow, e.g. because they are trying to
“renew” symmetric keys.
Change-Id: I2779f7eff30d82163f2c34a625ec91dc34fab548
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6431
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The documentation in md32_common.h is now (more) correct with respect
to the most important details of the layout of |HASH_CTX|. The
documentation explaining why sha512.c doesn't use md32_common.h is now
more accurate as well.
Before, the C implementations of HASH_BLOCK_DATA_ORDER took a pointer
to the |HASH_CTX| and the assembly language implementations tool a
pointer to the hash state |h| member of |HASH_CTX|. (This worked
because |h| is always the first member of |HASH_CTX|.) Now, the C
implementations take a pointer directly to |h| too.
The definitions of |MD4_CTX|, |MD5_CTX|, and |SHA1_CTX| were changed to
be consistent with |SHA256_CTX| and |SHA512_CTX| in storing the hash
state in an array. This will break source compatibility with any
external code that accesses the hash state directly, but will not
affect binary compatibility.
The second parameter of |HASH_BLOCK_DATA_ORDER| is now of type
|const uint8_t *|; previously it was |void *| and all implementations
had a |uint8_t *data| variable to access it as an array of bytes.
This change paves the way for future refactorings such as automatically
generating the |*_Init| functions and/or sharing one I-U-F
implementation across all digest algorithms.
Change-Id: I30513bb40b5f1d2c8932551d54073c35484b3f8b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6401
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime does not modify its |BN_MONT_CTX| so that
value should be const.
Change-Id: Ie74e48eec8061899fd056fbd99dcca2a86b02cad
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6403
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This simply converts a cipher suite string to the list of cipher suites
that it implies.
Change-Id: Id8b31086715d619ea6601c40a6eb84dc0d8c500d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6370
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
That function doesn't do anything useful for DTLS. It's meant for tracking the
rest of the record we've already committed to by writing half of one. But one
cannot write half a datagram, so DTLS never tracks this. Just call
ssl_write_buffer_flush straight and don't touch wpend_*.
Change-Id: Ibe191907d64c955c7cfeefba26f5c11ad5e4b939
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6418
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Although the DTLS transport layer logic drops failed writes on the floor, it is
actually set up to work correctly. If an SSL_write fails at the transport,
dropping the buffer is fine. Arguably it works better than in TLS because we
don't have the weird "half-committed to data" behavior. Likewise, the handshake
keeps track of how far its gotten and resumes the message at the right point.
This broke when the buffering logic was rewritten because I didn't understand
what the DTLS code was doing. The one thing that doesn't work as one might
expect is non-fatal write errors during rexmit are not recoverable. The next
timeout must fire before we try again.
This code is quite badly sprinkled in here, so add tests to guard it against
future turbulence. Because of the rexmit issues, the tests need some hacks
around calls which may trigger them. It also changes the Go DTLS implementation
from being completely strict about sequence numbers to only requiring they be
monotonic.
The tests also revealed another bug. This one seems to be upstream's fault, not
mine. The logic to reset the handshake hash on the second ClientHello (in the
HelloVerifyRequest case) was a little overenthusiastic and breaks if the
ClientHello took multiple tries to send.
Change-Id: I9b38b93fff7ae62faf8e36c4beaf848850b3f4b9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6417
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's somewhat annoying to have to parse out the packetAdaptor mini-language.
Actually seeing those is only useful when debugging the adaptor itself, rather
than DTLS. Switch the order of the two middleware bits and add an escape hatch
to log the funny opcodes.
Change-Id: I249c45928a76b747d69f3ab972ea4d31e0680a62
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6416
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
89d4a68c introduced -Wmissing-field-initializers because it seemed
generally useful. However, Clang and GCC have differing opinions about
what counts as missing. This change should make Clang happy too.
Change-Id: I070c719f5c47f537207200d5399e093cc083e58f
Android is now using Ninja so it doesn't spew so much to the terminal
and thus any warnings in BoringSSL (which builds really early in the
process) and much more obvious.
Thus this change fixes a few warnings that appear in the Android build.
Change-Id: Id255ace90fece772a1c3a718c877559ce920b960
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6400
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a fairly timid, first step at trying to pack common structures a
little better.
This change reorders a couple of structures a little and turns some
variables into bit-fields. Much more can still be done.
Change-Id: Idbe0f54d66559c0ad654bf7e8dea277a771a568f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6394
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: If78cba6abc36999488981db2a12b039024c757df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6391
Reviewed-by: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts most of commit 271777f5ac. The old
ChaCha20-Poly1305, though being transitioned to the old name, should not change
in behavior. This also avoids adding a special-case to SSL_AEAD_CTX.
Also revert the name change to SSL_CIPHER_is_CHACHA20POLY1305. The one consumer
for that function doesn't need to distinguish the old and new variants, so
avoid unnecessary turbulence.
Change-Id: I5a6f97fccc5839d4d25e74e304dc002329d21b4b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6385
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I799e289a402612446e08f64f59e0243f164cf695
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6372
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
QUIC code references the TXT macro. Also get rid of
TLS1_TXT_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305 which wasn't renamed for some reason.
Change-Id: I0308e07104b3cec394d748f3f1146bd786d2ace2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6384
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since we pre-generate our perlasm, having the output of these files be
sensitive to the environment the run in is unhelpful. It would be bad to
suddenly change what features we do or don't compile in whenever workstations'
toolchains change or if developers do or don't have CC variables set.
Previously, all compiler-version-gated features were turned on in
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6260, but this broke the build. I
also wasn't thorough enough in gathering performance numbers. So, flip them all
to off instead. I'll enable them one-by-one as they're tested.
This should result in no change to generated assembly.
Change-Id: Ib4259b3f97adc4939cb0557c5580e8def120d5bc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6383
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change causes the generated Bazel files to include the assembly
file lists for other platforms.
Change-Id: Ic474b6900f8c109393baac1ec9cc2d112f155a56
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6390
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
WebRTC can't roll into Chromium without picking up the iOS build fix, but we
can't roll BoringSSL forwards because WebRTC also depends on the previously
exposed ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite constants.
Define the old constants again.
Change-Id: If8434a0317e42b3aebe1bc1c5a58ed97a89a0230
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6382
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
EVP_aead_chacha20_poly1305_old is listed twice instead of
EVP_aead_chacha20_poly1305.
Change-Id: I281eee7a8359cd2a2b04047c829ef351ea4a7b82
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6381
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The other codepath is Linux-specific. This should get tidied up a bit but, in
the meantime, fix the Chromium iOS (NO_ASM) build. Even when the assembly gets
working, it seems iOS prefers you make fat binaries rather than detect features
at runtime, so this is what we want anyway.
BUG=548539
Change-Id: If19b2e380a96918b07bacc300a3a27b885697b99
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6380
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was submitted to check that it worked on all the builders but, in
normal usage, we should build without OPENSSL_SMALL so that everything
is compiled.
Change-Id: I31ac899862e3b31c55bf265a7ec5ff0cc9770b48
The previous commit fixed a signed/unsigned warning but, on 32-bit
systems, long is only 32 bits, so the fix was incorrect there.
Change-Id: I6afe340164de0e176c7f710fcdd095b2a4cddee4
1. Check for the presence of the private key before allocating or
computing anything.
2. Check the return value of |BN_CTX_get|.
3. Don't bother computing the Y coordinate since it is not used.
4. Remove conditional logic in cleanup section.
Change-Id: I4d8611603363c7e5d16a8e9f1d6c3a56809f27ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6171
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
These functions ultimately return the result of |BN_num_bits|, and that
function's return type is |unsigned|. Thus, these functions' return
type should also be |unsigned|.
Change-Id: I2cef63e6f75425857bac71f7c5517ef22ab2296b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6170
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This came up and I wasn't sure which it was without source-diving.
Change-Id: Ie659096e0f42a7448f81dfb1006c125d292fd7fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6354
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Intel's P-256 code has very large tables and things like Chromium just
don't need that extra size. However, servers generally do so this change
adds an OPENSSL_SMALL define that currently just drops the 64-bit P-224
but will gate Intel's P-256 in the future too.
Change-Id: I2e55c6e06327fafabef9b96d875069d95c0eea81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6362
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
QUIC has a complex relationship with BoringSSL owing to it living both
in Chromium and the Google-internal repository. In order for it to
handle the ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD switch more easily this change gives
the unsuffixed name to the old AEAD, for now.
Once QUIC has moved to the “_old” version the unsuffixed name can be
given to the new version.
Change-Id: Id8a77be6e3fe2358d78e022413fe088e5a274dca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6361
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
If the application is only using the P-256 implementation in p256-64.c,
then the WNAF code would all be dead code. The change reorganizes the
code so that all modern toolchains should be able to recognize that
fact and eliminate the WNAF-based code when it is unused.
Change-Id: I9f94bd934ca7d2292de4c29bb89e17c940c7cd2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6173
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
None of these methods vary per group. Factoring these out of
|EC_METHOD| should help some toolchains to do a better job optimizing
the code for size.
Change-Id: Ibd22a52992b4d549f12a8d22bddfdb3051aaa891
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6172
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
The tests in crypto/cipher/test/chacha20_poly1305_deprecated_tests.txt
were adapted to the RFC 7539 AEAD construction by recalculating the tags.
Also a few additional vectors were added. These vectors were verified
against nettle. See
feb7292bf1.
Change-Id: Ib3f2797d5825bc1e32c55f845b5070b6993e4aff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6144
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This change reduces unnecessary copying and makes the pre-RFC-7539
nonces 96 bits just like the AES-GCM, AES-CCM, and RFC 7539
ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suites. Also, all the symbols related to
the pre-RFC-7539 cipher suites now have "_OLD" appended, in
preparation for adding the RFC 7539 variants.
Change-Id: I1f85bd825b383c3134df0b6214266069ded029ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6103
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
The new function |CRYPTO_chacha_96_bit_nonce_from_64_bit_nonce| can be
used to adapt code from that uses 64 bit nonces, in a way that is
compatible with the old semantics.
Change-Id: I83d5b2d482e006e82982f58c9f981e8078c3e1b0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6100
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
