Until we've gotten it fully working, we should not mint any of these
SSL_SESSIONs, to avoid constraining future versions of our client code.
Notably, if any of our TLS 1.3 clients today serialized sessions, we
would need to rev the serialization format. Without opting into 0-RTT, a
TLS 1.3 client will create SSL_SESSIONs tagged as 0-RTT-capable but
missing important fields (ALPN, etc.). When that serialized session
makes its way to a future version of our client code, it would disagree
with the server about the ALPN value stored in the ticket and cause
interop failures.
I believe the only client code enabling TLS 1.3 right now is Chrome, and
the window is small, so it should be fine. But fix this now before it
becomes a problem.
Change-Id: Ie2b109f8d158017a6f3b4cb6169050d38a66b31c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13342
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I324743e7d1864fbbb9653209ff93e4da872c8d31
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13340
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idc93fdca2f1c5c23e4ba48c4efed2edbad1e857b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12521
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The TLS 1.2 state machine now looks actually much closer to the TLS 1.3
one on the write side. Although the write states still have a BIO-style
return, they don't actually send anything anymore. Only the BIO flush
state does. Reads are still integrated into the states themselves
though, so I haven't made it match TLS 1.3 yet.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I7708162efca13cd335723efa5080718a5f2808ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13228
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The SSL code suffers from needing too many verbs for variations on
writing things without actually writing them. We used to have queuing
the message up to be written to the buffer BIO, writing to the buffer
BIO, and flushing the buffer BIO. (Reading, conversely, has a similar
mess of verbs.)
Now we just have adding to the pending flight and flushing the pending
flight, match the SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD naming.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I332966928bf13f03dfb8eddd519c2fefdd7f24d4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13227
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Large chunks of contiguous messages can now be sent in a row. Notably,
the ServerHello flight involves a number of optional messages which can
now be collapsed into straight-line code.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I1429d22a12401aa0f811a04e495bd5d754c084a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13226
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
On the TLS side, we introduce a running buffer of ciphertext. Queuing up
pending data consists of encrypting the record into the buffer. This
effectively reimplements what the buffer BIO was doing previously, but
this resizes to fit the whole flight.
As part of this, rename all the functions to add to the pending flight
to be more uniform. This CL proposes "add_foo" to add to the pending
flight and "flush_flight" to drain it.
We add an add_alert hook for alerts but, for now, only the SSL 3.0
warning alert (sent mid-handshake) uses this mechanism. Later work will
push this down to the rest of the write path so closure alerts use it
too, as in DTLS. The intended end state is that all the ssl_buffer.c and
wpend_ret logic will only be used for application data and eventually
optionally replaced by the in-place API, while all "incidental" data
will be handled internally.
For now, the two buffers are mutually exclusive. Moving closure alerts
to "incidentals" will change this, but flushing application data early
is tricky due to wpend_ret. (If we call ssl_write_buffer_flush,
do_ssl3_write doesn't realize it still has a wpend_ret to replay.) That
too is all left alone in this change.
To keep the diff down, write_message is retained for now and will be
removed from the state machines in a follow-up change.
BUG=72
Change-Id: Ibce882f5f7196880648f25d5005322ca4055c71d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13224
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Instead, "writing" a message merely adds it to the outgoing_messages
structure. The code to write the flight then loops over it all and now
shares code with retransmission. The verbs here are all a little odd,
but they'll be fixed in later commits.
In doing so, this fixes a slight miscalculation of the record-layer
overhead when retransmitting a flight that spans two epochs. (We'd use
the encrypted epoch's overhead for the unencrypted epoch.)
BUG=72
Change-Id: I8ac897c955cc74799f8b5ca6923906e97d6dad17
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13223
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These are no longer used anywhere.
Change-Id: Id79299f92c705f6bb7aed7acb48994d4498bd2d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13341
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was replaced by the more general CLIENT_RANDOM scheme that records
the master secret. Support was added in Wireshark 1.8.0, released in
June 2012. At this point, ECDHE is sufficiently widely deployed that
anyone that cares about this feature must have upgraded their Wireshark
by now.
Change-Id: I9b708f245ec8728c1999daf91aca663be7d25661
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13263
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This will let us avoid a scratch buffer when assembling DTLS handshake
packets in the write_message-less flow.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I15e78efe3a9e3933c307e599f0043427330f4a9e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13262
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We need to suppress a few tests on the system Android build until
RSA-PSS is shipped there.
Change-Id: I5843997aae9fa499ec08d76f44fdf3b523599e1c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13267
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CMake's language is a little dumb about string interpolation. Set it to
"generic", which is the value OPENSSL_NO_ASM uses.
Change-Id: Id98a0309e24465f10bcd7dab4a2000d1038edac0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13261
Reviewed-by: Kenny Root <kroot@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifc28887cbf91c7a80bdaf56e3bf80b2f8cfa7d53
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13260
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Eventually, all uses of crypto/x509 will be from ssl_x509.c, but this is
just a start.
Change-Id: I2f38cdcbf18b1f26add0aac10a70af10a79dee0e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13242
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the first part to removing the buffer BIO. The eventual end
state is the SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD is responsible for maintaining one
flight's worth of messages. In TLS, it will just be a buffer containing
the flight's ciphertext. In DTLS, it's the existing structure for
retransmit purposes. There will be hooks:
- add_message (synchronous)
- add_change_cipher_spec (synchronous)
- add_warning_alert (synchronous; needed until we lose SSLv3 client auth
and TLS 1.3 draft 18; draft 19 will switch end_of_early_data to a
handshake message)
- write_flight (BIO; flush_flight will be renamed to this)
This also preserves the exact return value of BIO_flush. Eventually all
the BIO_write calls will be hidden behind BIO_flush to, to be consistent
with other BIO-based calls, preserve the return value.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I74cd23759a17356aab3bb475a8ea42bd2cd115c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13222
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The Windows assembler doesn't appear to do preprocessor macros but nor
can it cope with this style of label.
Change-Id: I0b8ca7372bb9ea0f20101ed138681d379944658e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13207
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Bazel doesn't allow one to give different flags for C and C++ files, so
trying to set -std=c11 for all ssl/ sources (which now include C++)
blows up.
This change splits the lists for Bazel so that they can be put in
different cc_library targets and thus have different flags.
Change-Id: I1e3dee01b6558de59246bc470527d44c9c86b188
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13206
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is basically the same implementation I wrote for Go
The Go implementation:
https://github.com/golang/crypto/blob/master/chacha20poly1305/chacha20poly1305_amd64.s
The Cloudflare patch for OpenSSL:
https://github.com/cloudflare/sslconfig/blob/master/patches/openssl__chacha20_poly1305_draft_and_rfc_ossl102j.patch
The Seal/Open is only available for the new version, the old one uses
the bundled Poly1305, and the existing ChaCha20 implementations
The benefits of this code, compared to the optimized code currently
disabled in BoringSSL:
* Passes test vectors
* Faster performance: The AVX2 code (on Haswell), is 55% faster for 16B,
15% for 1350 and 6% for 8192 byte buffers
* Even faster on pre-AVX2 CPUs
Feel free to put whatever license, etc. is appropriate, under the
existing CLA.
Benchmarks are for 16/1350/8192 chunk sizes and given in MB/s:
Before (Ivy Bridge): 34.2 589.5 739.4
After: 68.4 692.1 799.4
Before (Skylake): 50 1233 1649
After: 119.4 1736 2196
After (Andy's): 63.6 1608 2261
Change-Id: I9186f721812655011fc17698b67ddbe8a1c7203b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13142
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I2ceb88f745db6fd16b30fe6f3f8fd9c29f0d3b8d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13234
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
EVP_parse_public_key already acts like CBS_get_* in that it peels one
element off and leaves a remainder.
Change-Id: Ic90952785005ed81664a6f46503b13ecd293176c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13045
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(These files weren't being built anyway.)
Change-Id: Id6c8d211b9ef867bdb7d83153458f9ad4e29e525
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13205
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
For now, this is the laziest conversion possible. The intent is to just
get the build setup ready so that we can get everything working in our
consumers. The intended end state is:
- The standalone build produces three test targets, one per library:
{crypto,ssl,decrepit}_tests.
- Each FOO_test is made up of:
FOO/**/*_test.cc
crypto/test/gtest_main.cc
test_support
- generate_build_files.py emits variables crypto_test_sources and
ssl_test_sources. These variables are populated with FindCFiles,
looking for *_test.cc.
- The consuming file assembles those variables into the two test targets
(plus decrepit) from there. This avoids having generate_build_files.py
emit actual build rules.
- Our standalone builders, Chromium, and Android just run the top-level
test targets using whatever GTest-based reporting story they have.
In transition, we start by converting one of two tests in each library
to populate the three test targets. Those are added to all_tests.json
and all_tests.go hacked to handle them transparently. This keeps our
standalone builder working.
generate_build_files.py, to start with, populates the new source lists
manually and subtracts them out of the old machinery. We emit both for
the time being. When this change rolls in, we'll write all the build
glue needed to build the GTest-based tests and add it to consumers'
continuous builders.
Next, we'll subsume a file-based test and get the consumers working with
that. (I.e. make sure the GTest targets can depend on a data file.)
Once that's all done, we'll be sure all this will work. At that point,
we start subsuming the remaining tests into the GTest targets and,
asynchronously, rewriting tests to use GTest properly rather than
cursory conversion here.
When all non-GTest tests are gone, the old generate_build_files.py hooks
will be removed, consumers updated to not depend on them, and standalone
builders converted to not rely on all_tests.go, which can then be
removed. (Unless bits end up being needed as a malloc test driver. I'm
thinking we'll want to do something with --gtest_filter.)
As part of this CL, I've bumped the CMake requirements (for
target_include_directories) and added a few suppressions for warnings
that GTest doesn't pass.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I881b26b07a8739cc0b52dbb51a30956908e1b71a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13232
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium hasn't used gyp for a while. Get this out of the way for the
googletest transition.
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ic8808391d9f7de3e95cfc68654acf825389f6829
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13231
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Snapshotted from 5e7fd50e17b6edf1cadff973d0ec68966cf3265e in the
upstream repository:
https://github.com/google/googletest
Since standalone builds and bots will need this, checking in a copy
rather than require everyone use gclient, repo, git submodules or scary
CMake scripts is probably simplest.
Consumers with their own copies of googletest will likely wish to ignore
or even exclude this directory.
BUG=129
Change-Id: If9f4cec5ae0d7a3976dcfffd1ead6950ef7b7c4e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13229
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
It's not completely clear to me why select_cetificate_cb behaves the way it
does, however not only is it confusing, but it makes assumptions about the
application using BoringSSL (it's not always possible to implement custom
logic outside of the callbacks provided by libssl), that make this callback
somewhat useless.
Case in point, the callback can be used for changing min/max protocol versions
based on per-site policies, and select_certificate_cb is the only place where
SSL_set_min/max_proto_version() can be used (e.g. you can't call them in
cert_cb because it's too late), but the decision on the specific versions to
use might depend on configuration that needs retrieving asynchronously from
over the network, which requires re-running the callback multiple times.
Change-Id: Ia8e151b163628545373e7fd1f327e9af207478a6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13000
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Several of our AEADs support truncated tags, but I don't believe that we
had a test for them previously.
Change-Id: I63fdd194c47c17b3d816b912a568534c393df9d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13204
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We have a test somewhere which tries to read off of it. Align the getter
roughly with upstream's SSL_SESSION_get0_id_context (which we don't
currently expose).
BUG=6
Change-Id: Iab240868838ba56c1f08d112888d9536574347b4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12636
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
BUG=chromium:682816
Change-Id: I2345d6db83441691fe0c1ab6d7c6da4d24777849
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13203
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commit def9b46801.
(I should have uploaded a new version before sending to the commit queue.)
Change-Id: Iaead89c8d7fc1f56e6294d869db9238b467f520a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13202
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TLS 1.3 forbids warning alerts, and sending these is a bad idea. Per RFC
6066:
If the server understood the ClientHello extension but
does not recognize the server name, the server SHOULD take one of two
actions: either abort the handshake by sending a fatal-level
unrecognized_name(112) alert or continue the handshake. It is NOT
RECOMMENDED to send a warning-level unrecognized_name(112) alert,
because the client's behavior in response to warning-level alerts is
unpredictable.
The motivation is to cut down on the number of places where we send
non-closing alerts. We can't remove them yet (SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.3 draft
18 need to go), but eventually this can be a simplifying assumption.
Already this means DTLS never sends warning alerts, which is good
because DTLS can't retransmit them.
Change-Id: I577a1eb9c23e66d28235c0fbe913f00965e19486
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13221
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This doesn't do anything useful. Every caller either never sets the
callback as a client or goes out of their way to filter out clients in
the callback.
Change-Id: I6f07d000a727f9ccba080f812e6b8e7a38e04350
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13220
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
Change-Id: Icd9c2117c657f3aa6df55990c618d562194ef0e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13201
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is to make sure all of libssl's consumers' have sufficiently
reasonable toolchains. Once this bakes, we can go about moving
libssl to C++.
This is just starting with libssl for now because libcrypto has more
consumers and libssl would benefit more from C++ than libcrypto (though
libcrypto also has code that would benefit).
BUG=132
Change-Id: Ie02f7b0a8a95defd289cc7e62451d4b16408ca2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13161
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia6598ee4b2d4623abfc140d6a5c0eca4bcb30427
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13180
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Measured on a SkyLake processor:
Before:
Did 11373750 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1016000us (11194635.8 ops/sec): 179.1 MB/s
Did 2253000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1016000us (2217519.7 ops/sec): 2993.7 MB/s
Did 453750 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1015000us (447044.3 ops/sec): 3662.2 MB/s
Did 10753500 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1016000us (10584153.5 ops/sec): 169.3 MB/s
Did 1898750 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1015000us (1870689.7 ops/sec): 2525.4 MB/s
Did 374000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1016000us (368110.2 ops/sec): 3015.6 MB/s
After:
Did 11074000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1015000us (10910344.8 ops/sec): 174.6 MB/s
Did 3178250 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1016000us (3128198.8 ops/sec): 4223.1 MB/s
Did 734500 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1016000us (722933.1 ops/sec): 5922.3 MB/s
Did 10394750 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1015000us (10241133.0 ops/sec): 163.9 MB/s
Did 2502250 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1016000us (2462844.5 ops/sec): 3324.8 MB/s
Did 544500 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1015000us (536453.2 ops/sec): 4394.6 MB/s
Change-Id: If058935796441ed4e577b9a72d3aa43422edba58
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7273
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This was removed in a00cafc50c because
none of the assembly actually appeared to need it. However, we found the
assembly the uses it: the MOVBE-based, x86-64 code.
Needing H seems silly since Htable is there, but rather than mess with
the assembly, it's easier to put H back in the structure—now with a
better comment.
Change-Id: Ie038cc4482387264d5e0821664fb41f575826d6f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13122
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Fuchsia uses crypto/rand/fuchsia.c for CRYPTO_sysrand, and so must be
excluded from the Linux/Apple/POSIX variant.
Change-Id: Ide9f0aa2547d52ce0579cd0a1882b2cdcc7b95c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13141
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These are no longer needed.
Change-Id: I909f7d690f57dafcdad6254948b5683757da69f4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13160
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds the OS-specific routines to get random bytes when using
BoringSSL on Fuchsia. Fuchsia uses the Magenta kernel, which provides
random bytes via a syscall rather than via a file or library function.
Change-Id: I32f858246425309d643d142214c7b8de0c62250a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13140
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This function is only called twice per ECDH or ECDSA operation, and
it only saves a few scalar multiplications and additions compared to
the alternative, so it doesn't need to be specialized.
As the TODO comment above the callers notes, the two calls can be
reduced to one. Implementing |ecp_nistz256_from_mont| in terms of
|ecp_nistz256_mul_mont| helps show that that change is safe.
This also saves a small amount of code size and improves testing and
verification efficiency.
Note that this is already how the function is implemented for targets
other than x86-64 in OpenSSL.
Change-Id: If1404951f1a787d2618c853afd1f0e99a019e012
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13021
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
There is no AVX implementation for x86. Previously on x86 the code
checked to see if AVX and MOVBE are available, and if so, then it
uses the CLMUL implementation. Otherwise it fell back to the same
CLMUL implementation. Thus, there is no reason to check if AVX + MOVBE
are enabled on x86.
Change-Id: Id4983d5d38d6b3269a40e288bca6cc51d2d13966
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13024
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
BoringSSL will always use the SSE version so this is all dead code.
Change-Id: I0f3b51ee29144b5c83d2553c92bebae901b6366f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13023
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
