Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html
Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.
BUG=23
Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There only needs to be a single place where we do the generic
initialisation. All the processor-specific implementations can just
return early.
Change-Id: Ifd8a9c3bd7bec1ee8307aaa7bbeb9afe575e8a47
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12540
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Previously, gcm.c contained a lot of workarounds for cases where BSWAP8
wasn't defined. Rather than handle this in each place, just make it
always available.
While we're here, make these macros inline functions instead and rename
them to something less likely to collide.
Change-Id: I9f2602f8b9965c63a86b177a8a084afb8b53a253
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12479
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CRYPTO_ghash_init exposes the (often hardware accelerated) internals for
evaluating GHASH. These can be used for evaluating POLYVAL[1] on
platforms where we don't have dedicated code for it.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-02#section-3
Change-Id: Ida49ce4911f8657fa384b0bca968daa2ac6b26c1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12478
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The key is only needed during initialisation because after that point it
is implicit in the table of powers. So no need to keep it around. There
was a non-specific “haunted house” comment about not changing this, but
I've successfully tested with all the assembly versions so I think that
comment is no longer true.
Change-Id: Id110156afb528904f114d9a4ff2440e03a1a69b8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12477
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The GCM code has lots of cases of big-endian support left over from
OpenSSL. Since we don't support big-endian systems, drop that code.
Change-Id: I28eb95a9c235c6f705a145fbea72e7569dad2c70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12476
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Macros need a healthy dose of parentheses to avoid expression-level
misparses. Most of this comes from the clang-tidy CL here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/235696/
Also switch most of the macros to use do { ... } while (0) to avoid all
the excessive comma operators and statement-level misparses.
Change-Id: I4c2ee51e347d2aa8c74a2d82de63838b03bbb0f9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11660
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds AES and GHASH assembly from upstream, with the aim of
speeding up AES-GCM.
The PPC64LE assembly matches the interface of the ARMv8 assembly so I've
changed the prefix of both sets of asm functions to be the same
("aes_hw_").
Otherwise, the new assmebly files and Perlasm match exactly those from
upstream's c536b6be1a (from their master branch).
Before:
Did 1879000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000428us (1878196.1 ops/sec): 30.1 MB/s
Did 61000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006660us (60596.4 ops/sec): 81.8 MB/s
Did 11000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1072649us (10255.0 ops/sec): 84.0 MB/s
Did 1665000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000591us (1664016.6 ops/sec): 26.6 MB/s
Did 52000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006971us (51640.0 ops/sec): 69.7 MB/s
Did 8840 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1013294us (8724.0 ops/sec): 71.5 MB/s
After:
Did 4994000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000017us (4993915.1 ops/sec): 79.9 MB/s
Did 1389000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000073us (1388898.6 ops/sec): 1875.0 MB/s
Did 319000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000101us (318967.8 ops/sec): 2613.0 MB/s
Did 4668000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000149us (4667304.6 ops/sec): 74.7 MB/s
Did 1202000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000646us (1201224.0 ops/sec): 1621.7 MB/s
Did 269000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002804us (268247.8 ops/sec): 2197.5 MB/s
Change-Id: Id848562bd4e1aa79a4683012501dfa5e6c08cfcc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11262
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The stuff around i being reused for |len| rounded to a number of blocks
is a little weird.
Change-Id: I6f07a82fe84d077062e5b34ce75cc68250be8a4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10802
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was done just by grepping for 'size_t i;' and 'size_t j;'. I left
everything in crypto/x509 and friends alone.
There's some instances in gcm.c that are non-trivial and pulled into a
separate CL for ease of review.
Change-Id: I6515804e3097f7e90855f1e7610868ee87117223
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We recently gained -Werror=missing-prototypes. (See also, we really need to get
those Android bots...)
Change-Id: I3962d3050bccf5f5a057d029b5cbff1695ca1a03
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7540
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We never heap-allocate a GCM128_CONTEXT.
Change-Id: I7e89419ce4d81c1598a4b3a214c44dbbcd709651
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7430
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit a3d9528e9e has a bug that could
cause counters to be reused if |$avx=2| were set in the AES-NI AES-GCM
assembly code, if the EVP interface were used with certain coding
patterns, as demonstrated by the test cases added in
a5ee83f67e.
This changes the encryption code in the same way the decryption code
was changed in a3d9528e9e.
This doesn't have any effect currently since the AES-NI AES-GCM code
has |$avx=0| now, so |aesni_gcm_encrypt| doesn't change the counter.
Change-Id: Iba69cb4d2043d1ea57c6538b398246af28cba006
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7193
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change makes the AEAD and EVP code paths use the same code for
AES-GCM. When AVX instructions are enabled in the assembly this will
allow them to use the stitched AES-GCM implementation.
Note that the stitched implementations are no-ops for small inputs
(smaller than 288 bytes for encryption; smaller than 96 bytes for
decryption). This means that only a handful of test cases with longish
inputs actually test the stitched code.
Change-Id: Iece8003d90448dcac9e0bde1f42ff102ebe1a1c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7173
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
C has implicit conversion of |void *| to other pointer types so these
casts are unnecessary. Clean them up to make the code easier to read
and to make it easier to find dangerous casts.
Change-Id: I26988a672e8ed4d69c75cfbb284413999b475464
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7102
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
stdint.h already has macros for this. The spec says that, in C++,
__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS is needed, so define it for bytestring_test.cc.
Chromium seems to use these macros without trouble, so I'm assuming we
can rely on them.
Change-Id: I56d178689b44d22c6379911bbb93d3b01dd832a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6510
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
gcm_test.cc needs to access the internal GCM symbols. This is
unfortunate because it means that they have to be marked OPENSSL_EXPORT
just for this.
To compensate, modes.h is removed and its contents copied into
crypto/modes/internal.h.
Change-Id: I1777b2ef8afd154c43417137673a28598a7ec30e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6360
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This removes the confusion about whether |gcm128_context| copies the
key (it didn't) or whether the caller is responsible for keeping the
key alive for the lifetime of the |gcm128_context| (it was).
Change-Id: Ia0ad0a8223e664381fbbfb56570b2545f51cad9f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6053
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
The key is never modified through the key pointer member, and the
calling code relies on that fact for maintaining its own
const-correctness.
Change-Id: I63946451aa7c400cd127895a61c30d9a647b1b8c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6040
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
MSVC was warning about the assignment in the |if| condition. Also, the
formatting of the negative number made it look like a subtraction.
Finally, what was being calculated was unclear.
Change-Id: If56c672302c638aac6a87f715e8dcbb87ecb56ed
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6212
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Some ARM environments don't support |getauxval| or signals and need to
configure the capabilities of the chip at compile time. This change adds
defines that allow them to do so.
Change-Id: I4e6987f69dd13444029bc7ac7ed4dbf8fb1faa76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6280
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
arm_arch.h is included from ARM asm files, but lives in crypto/, not
openssl/include/. Since the asm files are often built from a different
location than their position in the source tree, relative include paths
are unlikely to work so, rather than having crypto/ be a de-facto,
second global include path, this change moves arm_arch.h to
include/openssl/.
It also removes entries from many include paths because they should be
needed as relative includes are always based on the locations of the
source file.
Change-Id: I638ff43d641ca043a4fc06c0d901b11c6ff73542
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5746
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Replace |()| with |(void)| in some prototypes to avoid compiler
warnings about old-style prototypes when building in some non-default
configurations for ARM.
Change-Id: Id57825084941c997bb7c41ec8ed94962f97ff732
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5570
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Including string.h in base.h causes any file that includes a BoringSSL
header to include string.h. Generally this wouldn't be a problem,
although string.h might slow down the compile if it wasn't otherwise
needed. However, it also causes problems for ipsec-tools in Android
because OpenSSL didn't have this behaviour.
This change removes string.h from base.h and, instead, adds it to each
.c file that requires it.
Change-Id: I5968e50b0e230fd3adf9b72dd2836e6f52d6fb37
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3200
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is an initial cut at aarch64 support. I have only qemu to test it
however—hopefully hardware will be coming soon.
This also affects 32-bit ARM in that aarch64 chips can run 32-bit code
and we would like to be able to take advantage of the crypto operations
even in 32-bit mode. AES and GHASH should Just Work in this case: the
-armx.pl files can be built for either 32- or 64-bit mode based on the
flavour argument given to the Perl script.
SHA-1 and SHA-256 don't work like this however because they've never
support for multiple implementations, thus BoringSSL built for 32-bit
won't use the SHA instructions on an aarch64 chip.
No dedicated ChaCha20 or Poly1305 support yet.
Change-Id: Ib275bc4894a365c8ec7c42f4e91af6dba3bd686c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Câmara, D.; Gouvêa, C. P. L.; López, J. & Dahab, R.: Fast Software
Polynomial Multiplication on ARM Processors using the NEON Engine.
http://conradoplg.cryptoland.net/files/2010/12/mocrysen13.pdf
(Imported from upstream's 0fb3d5b4fdc76b8d4a4700d03480cda135c6c117)
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
