3c6a1ea674 switched what layer handled
the DTLS version mapping but forgot to correct the HelloVerifyRequest
logic to account for this.
Thanks to Jed Davis for noticing this.
Change-Id: I94ea18fc43a7ba15dd7250bfbcf44dbb3361b3ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11984
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This is already manually released at the end of the handshake. With this
change, it can happen implicitly, and SSL3_STATE shrinks further by
another pointer.
Change-Id: I94b9f2e4df55e8f2aa0b3a8799baa3b9a34d7ac1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12121
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Fuzzer mode explores the handshake, but at the cost of losing coverage
on the record layer. Add a separate build flag and client/server
corpora for this mode.
Note this requires tweaks in consumers' fuzzer build definitions.
BUG=111
Change-Id: I1026dc7301645e165a761068a1daad6eedc9271e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12108
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The distinction for full handshakes is not meaningful (the timestamp is
currently the start of the handshake), but for renewed sessions, we
currently retain the timestamp of the original issuance.
Instead, when minting or receiving tickets, adjust session->time and
session->timeout so that session->time is the ticket issuance time.
This is still not our final TLS 1.3 behavior (which will need a both
renewable and non-renewable times to honor the server ticket lifetime),
but it gets us closer and unblocks handling ticket_age_add from TLS 1.3
draft 18 and sends the correct NewSessionTicket lifetime.
This fixes the ticket lifetime hint which we emit on the server to
mirror the true ticket lifetime. It also fixes the TLS 1.3 server code
to not set the ticket lifetime hint. There is no need to waste ticket
size with it, it is no longer a "hint" in TLS 1.3, and even in the TLS
1.3 code we didn't fill it in on the server.
Change-Id: I140541f1005a24e53e1b1eaa90996d6dada1c3a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12105
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If there is a malloc failure while assembling the ticket, call
CBB_cleanup. Also return -1 instead of 0; zero means EOF in the old
state machine and -1 means error. (Except enough of the stack gets it
wrong that consumers handle both, but we should fix this.)
Change-Id: I98541a9fa12772ec159f9992d1f9f53e5ca4cc5a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12104
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's no sense in flushing twice in one flight. This means when
writing a message is finally synchronous, we don't need the intermediate
state at all.
Change-Id: Iaca60d64917f82dce0456a8b15de4ee00f2d557b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12103
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
TLS 1.3 clarifies that a ticket lifetime of zero means the session is
unusable. We don't currently pay attention to that field (to be fixed in
later changes) but, in preparation for this, switch the >= to a >.
Change-Id: I0e67a0d97bc8def04914f121e84d3e7a2d640d2c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12102
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These don't make sense and mean some SSL_SESSIONs serialize and
deserialize as different values. If we ever managed to create an
SSL_SESSION without a time, it would never expire because time always
gets set to time(NULL). If we ever created an SSL_SESSION with a zero
timeout, the timeout would be... three? Once we start adjusting
time/timeout to issuance time, driving timeout to zero is actually
plausible, so it should work properly.
Instead, make neither field optional. We always fill both out, so this
shouldn't have any effects. If it does, the only effect would be to
decline to resume some existing tickets which must have been so old that
we'd want them to have expired anyway.
Change-Id: Iee3620658c467dd6d96a2b695fec831721b03b5b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12101
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The values are long, so check for negative numbers.
Change-Id: I8fc7333edbed50dc058547a4b53bc10b234071b4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12100
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This business with |ok| is unnecessary. This function is still rather a
mess, but this is a small improvement.
Change-Id: I28fdf1a3687fe6a9d58d81a22cf2f8e7ce5b9b2c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12080
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
A renewed session does not refresh the timeout. Add tests for this in
preparation for future changes which will revise this logic.
Specifically, TLS 1.3 draft 18's ticket_age_add logic will require some
tweaks in lifetime tracking to record when the ticket was minted. We'll
also likely wish to tweak the parameters for 1.3 to account for (a)
ECDHE-PSK means we're only worried about expiring a short-circuited
authentication rather than forward secrecy and (b) two hours is too
short for a QUIC 0-RTT replacement.
Change-Id: I0f1edd09151e7fcb5aee2742ef8600fbd7080df6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12002
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is only used in one place where we don't take advantage of it being
sorted anyway.
Change-Id: If6f0d04e975db903e8a93c57c869ea4964c0be37
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12062
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the last blocker within BoringSSL itself to opaquifying SSL.
(There are still blockers in consumers, of course.)
BUG=6
Change-Id: Ie3b8dcb78eeaa9aea7311406c5431a8625d60401
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12061
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
TLS 1.3 ciphers are now always enabled and come with a hard-coded
preference order.
BUG=110
Change-Id: Idd9cb0d75fb6bf2676ecdee27d88893ff974c4a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12025
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
HTTP/2 requires TLS 1.2 so the negotiated version should be available
during the ALPN callback.
Change-Id: Iea332808b531a6e5c917de5b8c8917c0aa7428a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12060
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
They will get very confused about which key they're using. Any caller
using exporters must either (a) leave renegotiation off or (b) be very
aware of when renegotiations happen anyway. (You need to somehow
coordinate with the peer about which epoch's exporter to use.)
Change-Id: I921ad01ac9bdc88f3fd0f8283757ce673a47ec75
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12003
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The existing tests for this codepath require us to reconfigure the shim.
This will not work when TLS 1.3 cipher configuration is detached from
the old cipher language. It also doesn't hit codepaths like sessions
containing a TLS 1.3 version but TLS 1.2 cipher.
Instead, add some logic to the runner to rewrite tickets and build tests
out of that.
Change-Id: I57ac5d49c3069497ed9aaf430afc65c631014bf6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12024
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It is not ignored.
Change-Id: I2e607a6d6f7444838fc6fa65cd18e9aa142f139f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12023
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
HTTP/2 places requirements on the cipher suite. So that servers can
decline HTTP/2 when these requirements aren't met, defer ALPN
negotiation.
See also b/32553041.
Change-Id: Idbcf049f9c8bda06a8be52a0154fe76e84607268
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11982
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We were only testing one side.
Change-Id: Ieb755e27b235aaf1317bd2c8e5fb374cb0ecfdb3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12001
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Trim a few more bytes from the future QUIC ClientHello.
Change-Id: If23c5cd078889a9a26cf2231b51b17c2615a38ea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12000
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Get some of the duplicate logic out of the way.
Change-Id: Iee7c64577e14d1ddfead7e1e32c42c5c9f2a310d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11981
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TLS 1.3 also uses this extension and doesn't use any EC-based suites.
Always offering the extension is simpler. Also this gets an
SSL_get_ciphers call out of the way (that function is somewhat messy in
semantics).
Change-Id: I2091cb1046e0aea85caa76e73f50e8416e6ed94c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11980
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change is based on interpreting TLS 1.3 draft 18.
Change-Id: I727961aff2f7318bcbbc8bf6d62b7d6ad3e62da9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11921
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This should never happen, but the SSL_AEAD_CTX_new layer should enforce
key sizes as it's not locally obvious at the call site the caller didn't
get confused. There's still a mess of asserts below, but those should be
fixed by cutting the SSL_CIPHER/SSL_AEAD_CTX boundary differently.
(enc_key_len is validated by virtue of being passed into EVP_AEAD.)
BUG=chromium:659593
Change-Id: I8c91609bcef14ca1509c87aab981bbad6556975f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11940
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These were forward-declared for SSL3_STATE but with that hidden, it's no
longer necessary.
Change-Id: I8c548822f56f6172b4033b2fa89c038adcec2caa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11860
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Later work is going to cause some turbulence here.
Change-Id: Iba98bcf56e81492ec0dca54a381b38d1c115247a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11843
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is still rather a mess with how it's tied to SSL_AEAD_CTX_new
(probably these should get encapsulated in an SSL_AEAD struct), but this
avoids running the TLS 1.3 nonce logic on fake AEADs. This is impossible
based on cipher version checks, but we shouldn't need to rely on it.
It's also a little tidier since out_mac_secret_len is purely a function
of algorithm_mac.
BUG=chromium:659593
Change-Id: Icc24d43c54a582bcd189d55958e2d232ca2db4dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11842
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This shouldn't happen, but it is good to check to avoid the potential
underflow in ssl_session_is_time_valid.
This required tweaking the mock clock in bssl_shim to stop going back in
time.
Change-Id: Id3ab8755139e989190d0b53d4bf90fe1ac203022
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11841
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BUG=chromium:659593
Change-Id: I73a4751609b85df7cd40f0f60dc3f3046a490940
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11861
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We currently preferentially sign the largest hash available and
advertise such a preference for signatures we accept. We're just as
happy with SHA-256 and, all else equal, a smaller hash would be epsilon
more performant. We also currently claim, in TLS 1.3, we prefer P-384
over P-256 which is off.
Instead order SHA-256 first, next the larger SHA-2 hashes, and leave
SHA-1 at the bottom. Within a hash, order ECDSA > RSA-PSS > RSA-PKCS1.
This has the added consequence that we will preferentially pair P-256
with SHA-256 in signatures we generate instead of larger hashes that get
truncated anyway.
Change-Id: If4aee068ba6829e8c0ef7948f56e67a5213e4c50
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11821
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_write has messy semantics around retries. As a sanity-check, it does
pointer and length checks and requires the original and retry SSL_write
pass the same buffer pointer.
In some cases, buffer addresses may change but still include the
original data as a prefix on the retry. Callers then set
SSL_MODE_ACCEPT_MOVING_WRITE_BUFFER to skip the pointer check. But, in
that case, the pointer may have been freed so doing a comparison is
undefined behavior.
Short-circuiting the pointer equality check avoids this problem.
Change-Id: I76cb8f7d45533504cd95287bc53897ca636af51d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11760
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
On the client we'll leave it off by default until the change has made it
through Chrome's release process. For TLS 1.3, there is no existing
breakage risk, so always do it. This saves us the trouble of having to
manually turn it on in servers.
See [0] for a data point of someone getting it wrong.
[0] https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/9dbc21b1c3cc
Change-Id: I74daad9e7efd2040e9d66d72d558b31f145e6c4c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11680
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I18cee423675d6a686f83b4ef4b38696cb618392c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11683
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I0bd7fdd276e7461ef08b8055bf3d0387f756739f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11682
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=103
Change-Id: I9a49fbaf66af73978ce264d27926f483e1e44766
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11620
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Channel ID for TLS 1.3 uses the same digest construction as
CertificateVerify. This message is signed with the Channel ID key and
put in the same handshake message (with the same format) as in TLS 1.2.
BUG=103
Change-Id: Ia5b2dffe5a39c39db0cecb0aa6bdc328e53accc2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11420
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
{sha1, ecdsa} is virtually nonexistent. {sha512, ecdsa} is pointless
when we only accept P-256 and P-384. See Chromium Intent thread here:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/kWwLfeIQIBM/9chGZ40TCQAJ
This tweaks the signature algorithm logic slightly so that sign and
verify preferences are separate.
BUG=chromium:655318
Change-Id: I1097332600dcaa38e62e4dffa0194fb734c6df3f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11621
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If SSL_CTX_set_signing_algorithm_prefs or
SSL_set_signing_algorithm_prefs are
called multiple times for the same cert, the
previous cert->sigalgs will leak.
Free the existing sigalgs before setting a new one.
Change-Id: I73cdb366a8f47d8cc0baae986fd0aa80b60300e2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11640
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=6
Change-Id: I463f5daa0bbf0f65269c52da25fa235ee2aa6ffb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11240
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There were some logic errors that were revealed by testing at TLS 1.3.
Also explicitly test GetClientHelloLen at TLS 1.2 (rather than relying
on the default) since the TLS 1.3 ClientHello is too large.
Change-Id: I907cb6ac04b40f845e99593bad06739132ca56b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11605
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Some new tests needed to be suppressed.
Change-Id: I4474d752c338a18440efb213e0795ae81ad754fb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11583
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This should land in the same group of revisions as the two parent
commits.
Change-Id: Id9d769b890b3308ea70b705e7241c73cb1930ede
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11581
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We'll never send cookies, but we'll echo them on request. Implement it
in runner as well and test.
BUG=98
Change-Id: Idd3799f1eaccd52ac42f5e2e5ae07c209318c270
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11565
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This doesn't currently honor the required KeyUpdate response. That will
be done in a follow-up.
BUG=74
Change-Id: I750fc41278736cb24230303815e839c6f6967b6a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11412
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These too must be rejected. Test both unknown extensions and extensions
in the wrong context.
Change-Id: I54d5a5060f9efc26e5e4d23a0bde3c0d4d302d09
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11501
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This clears the last of Android's build warnings from BoringSSL. These
pragmas aren't actually no-ops, but it just means that MinGW consumers
(i.e. just Android) need to explicitly list the dependency (which they
do).
There may be something to be said for removing those and having everyone
list dependencies, but I don't really want to chase down every
consumer's build files. Probably not worth the trouble.
Change-Id: I8fcff954a6d5de9471f456db15c54a1b17cb937a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11573
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was a remnant of the old cipher suite setup.
Change-Id: Ibc79b81200a52d45fbd69b9c04060c38ad4707f5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11564
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
