The client downgrade detection tests were not asserting on the error (would
have caught the missing error string). Additionally, Downgrade-FalseStart-Draft
isn't testing what it's supposed to; it doesn't actually configure a draft
version or anything. Fix that and have it use ALPN rather than NPN, to match
the test above.
Change-Id: I0b759385641aa00994a912303a6f5bd65522b4bb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31204
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
make_errors.go didn't seem to get run.
Change-Id: I12739fbab75b9f4898f73f206e404d101642b9c0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31184
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifd7239106471bb59057b0a65c6e91837379c78bf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31164
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I5ce176538a53136aff3eea4af04b762ac9a5a994
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31044
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We broke this a while back and nothing noticed. (Note dereference just
above.) Therefore I guess we don't need to support it.
Change-Id: I501d43825e89acb5f7f13998541dc8ff59452a99
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31144
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Bug: None
Change-Id: I01ea2bb0508b018e219ecc94108e6a4fbe247984
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31124
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I2d1671a4f21a602191fd0c9b932244a376ac5713
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31104
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Imported from upstream's 0971432f6f6d8b40d797133621809bd31eb7bf4e and
7d4c97add12cfa5d4589880b09d6139c3203e2f4, but with missing tests added. Along
the way, make Bytes work with any Span<const uint8_t>-convertable type.
Change-Id: If365f981fe8a8274e12000309ffd99b1bb719842
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31086
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Historically, OpenSSL's modular exponentiation functions tolerated negative
moduli by ignoring the sign bit. The special case for a modulus of 1 should do
the same. That said, this is ridiculous and the only reason I'm importing this
is BN_abs_is_word(1) is marginally more efficient than BN_is_one() and we
haven't gotten around to enforcing positive moduli yet.
Thanks to Guido Vranken and OSSFuzz for finding this issue and reporting to
OpenSSL.
(Imported from upstream's 235119f015e46a74040b78b10fd6e954f7f07774.)
Change-Id: I526889dfbe2356753aa1e6ecfd3aa3dc3a8cd2b8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31085
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This fixes uninitialized memory read reported by Nick Mathewson in
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/6347.
It imports the memset from upstream's 2c739f72e5236a8e0c351c00047c77083dcdb77f,
but I believe that fix is incorrect and instead RC4 shouldn't be allowed in
this context. See
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6603#issuecomment-413066462 for
details.
Update-Note: Decoding a password-protected PEM block with RC4 will, rather than
derive garbage from uninitialized memory, simply fail. Trying to encode a
password-protect PEM block with an unsupported cipher will also fail, rather
than output garbage (e.g. tag-less AES-GCM).
Change-Id: Ib7e23dbf5514f0a523730926daad3c0bdb989417
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31084
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This imports upstream's be4e1f79f631e49c76d02fe4644b52f907c374b2.
Change-Id: If0c4f066ba0ce540beaddd6a3e2540165d949dd2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31024
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
- Document failure conditions of EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex,
EVP_DigestInit_ex, HMAC_Init_ex, and CBB_init
Change-Id: I643d1b92e88e7f690fa555f7d908317a23e5cd95
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30964
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This isn't actually shorter, but there is a bunch of slicing up of the ticket,
which Span makes a little easier to follow.
Change-Id: I7ea4dfe025641a3b88e2c9b8e34246fefc23412f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/29865
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Fixed up the comment about ssl_version. There's one line which I
manually edited:
int (*check_client_CA_list)(STACK_OF(CRYPTO_BUFFER) *names);
where clang-format puts spaces on both sides of the second *.
Change-Id: Id1c0bd02f664df14b1e5bbd8abaf2687fb9179db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31004
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The fuzzer found another place where it could cause a timeout by
providing a huge PBKDF2 iteration count. This change bounds another two
places where we parse out iteration counts and that's hopefully all of
them.
BUG=oss-fuzz:9853
Change-Id: I037fa09d2bee79e7435a9d40cbd89c07b4a9d443
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30944
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The anti-downgrade signal is being implemented in a follow-up change.
Change-Id: I5ea3ff429ed1389a3577026588fef3660d2d0615
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30904
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Works in the 1.3 and 1.2 client handshakes, not implemented on the
server for now.
Creates an SSL_CTX option to reverify the server certificate on session
resumption. Reverification only runs the client's certificate verify callback.
Adds new states to the client handshakes: state_reverify_server_certificate in
TLS 1.2, and state_server_certificate_reverify in TLS 1.3.
Adds a negative test to make sure that by default we don't verify the
certificate on resumption, and positive tests that make sure we do when the
new option is set.
Change-Id: I3a47ff3eacb3099df4db4c5bc57f7c801ceea8f1
Bug: chromium:347402
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/29984
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Along the way, split up the EVPTest Wycheproof tests into separate tests (they
shard better when running in parallel).
Change-Id: I5ee919f7ec7c35a7f2e0cc2af4142991a808a9db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30846
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also remove some transition step for a recent format change. Together, this
removes the curve hacks in the converter, which can now be purely syntactic.
The RSA ones are still a bit all over the place in terms of sharded vs
combined, so leaving that alone for now.
Change-Id: I721d6b0de388a53a39543725e366dc5b52e83561
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30845
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The size of an int is 4, not 2. To avoid worrying about this, add a GetVector
counterpart to GetString that handles all this. Apply this uniformly to avoid
all the pointer casts. This is less important for vector<uint8_t>, but even
then we'll now notice a 1-byte OOB read since std::string is NUL-terminated.
Also it's shorter.
Change-Id: Ie96591cb8d8d52742f5fd30d70b6af0511109585
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30864
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This only updates the repository. We'll catch up with the new tests in a
subsequent commit.
Change-Id: I074a041479159ce1141af3241e7158599b648365
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30844
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium ended up reverting their most recent roll, so match that.
Change-Id: I54b6351591d9169651f450ec3e800c7c9c28735c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30806
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We currently write a mix of "if (FOO)" and "if(FOO)". While the former looks
more like a usual language, CMake believes everything, even "if" and "else", is
just a really really funny function call (a "command").
We should pick something for consistency. Upstream CMake writes "if(FOO)", so
go with that one.
Change-Id: I67e0eb650a52670110b417312a362c9f161c8721
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30807
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_CTX_set1_sigalgs_list wants a NUL-terminated string, so we need to use
GetString to give it one.
Bug: oss-fuzz:9808
Change-Id: Id7f676aa514c36de9dea900763db3cbbf5c79a4c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30804
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise ninja run_tests doesn't work right build directories named something
other than "build" on Linux.
Change-Id: I4d7ff319aed338870f5ac071e875fda549bbbd06
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30824
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
The CFI bot is currently failing on a mysterious error message, coming from the
recent clang roll.
Called function is not the same type as the call!
call void @EVP_MD_CTX_init(%struct.env_md_ctx_st* %8), !dbg !72123
LLVM ERROR: Broken function found, compilation aborted!
Chromium actually passes -flto=thin, which seems to avoid the error, testing
locally. Why it does, I haven't the slightest clue. The offending calls to
EVP_MD_CTX_init (and EVP_MD_CTX_cleanup) are those buried in
bssl::ScopedEVP_MD_CTX. However, not all calls are problematic, only the one in
test_config.cc. What's more, if I add a call in async_bio.cc, linked into all
the same targets, the copy in test_config.cc is suddenly fine!?
Maybe there's just a bug in the LTO logic that ThinLTO avoids...
Change-Id: I5266eec75edea2a38dee8ad5591db8d65d3bdede
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30805
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Let's see if the TSan bot is working now.
Change-Id: Id86532f4cd2c4e216a0389c5030448afd707fdb7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30764
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
MSan and TSan both require instrumenting everything. Add some machinery so we
can do this on the bots.
Change-Id: I7d2106bc852ee976455d18787d3a20a35373a9e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30644
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ExpectTicketKeyChanged treats its input as an in/out parameter, but the first
time around there isn't a previous key. We could just call
SSL_CTX_get_tlsext_ticket_keys directly, but running it with the "previous"
keys as all zeros seems prudent; the ticket key rotation logic lazily
initializes keys and, were we to accidentally forget to initialize a key, the
zero key seems the most likely culprit.
Change-Id: I7167bef78e0bfcdb178195230ad84597f26d825c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30684
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a version of ChaCha20-Poly1305 that takes a 24-byte nonce,
making the nonce suitable for random generation. It's compatible with
the AEAD of the same name in libsodium.
Change-Id: Ie8b20ba551e5a290b390d362e487f06377166f4c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30384
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Upstream generalized most of the EVP_CTRL_GCM_* constants to be their general
AEAD API in 1.1.0. Define them for better compatibility with code that targets
OpenSSL 1.1.0.
Change-Id: Ieaed8379eebde3718e3048f6290c21cdeac01efd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30604
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These functions can be used to configure the signature algorithms. One
of them is a string mini-languaging parsing function, which we generally
dislike because it defeats static analysis. However, some dependent
projects (in this case TensorFlow) need it and we also dislike making
people patch.
Change-Id: I13f990c896a7f7332d78b1c351357d418ade8d11
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30304
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
I got an automated email from the previous config update to remove this.
Change-Id: I45586d3bda3241a513bf2f6a8ec3b2a87fc4f2f9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30584
Reviewed-by: Ryan Tseng <hinoka@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We keep tripping it due to weird quirks in fuzzer mode.
Change-Id: Ie09113d42b24070b1749d38f56253bb7d9147f3f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
embed_test_data.go assumes that it's working with 8KB chunks. However,
if the input file contains a '\' then the Go code thinks that it counts
as a byte, but the C compiler will probably merge it with the following
char and thus that string will be slightly too short. ASAN will detect
the out-of-bounds read when 8192 bytes are copied from the string.
Change-Id: If40ccfd39ea013bd6935fcc313cfe188fe985f67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30444
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Our test data uses values to up 2048 so the 1024 limit was causing tests
to fail in fuzzing mode.
Change-Id: I71b97be26376a04c13d1f438e5e36a5ffff1c1a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30484
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The previous limit was |UINT_MAX|. Windows limits to 600K, but that's
already causing issues. This seems like a balance between being
completely crazy and still large enough not to have to worry for a long
time. It's still probably too large for backend systems wanting to
process arbitrary PKCS#12, but I don't think any fixed value will
satisfy all desires.
Change-Id: I01a3f78d5f2df086f8dbc0e8bacfb95153738f55
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30424
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
(Otherwise the fuzzer will discover that it can trigger extremely large
amounts of computation and start timing out.)
BUG=oss-fuzz:9767
Change-Id: Ibc1da5a90da169c7caf522f792530d1020f8cb54
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30404
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change syncs several assembly files from upstream. The only meanful
additions are more CFI directives.
Change-Id: I6aec50b6fddbea297b79bae22cfd68d5c115220f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30364
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I believe that case was the only way that X509_check_purpose could
return anything other than zero or one. Thus eliminate the last use of
X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT.
Change-Id: If2f071dfa934b924491db2b615ec17390564e7de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30344
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
In fuzzing builds, session resumptions fail if the PRNG behaves the
same as in the initial session. Not sure of the reason, but a kick to
the PRNG fixes the problem and doesn't compromise determinism, so
... *shrug*?
Change-Id: I8181d98fdff16ae82255e9cda33ce5c4c40b5399
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30284
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This should hopefully fix a build failure on the fuzzers.
Change-Id: If8db8dee768a83538cf37a65ec23c3f68f2be6a2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30264
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
