Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html
Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.
BUG=23
Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Call |RSA_check_key| after parsing an RSA private key in order to
verify that the key is consistent. This is consistent with ECC key
parsing, which does a similar key check.
Call |RSA_check_key| after key generation mostly as a way of
double-checking the key generation was done correctly. A similar check
was not added to |EC_KEY_generate| because |EC_KEY_generate| is used
for generating ephemeral ECDH keys, and the check would be too
expensive for that use.
Change-Id: I5759d0d101c00711bbc30f81a3759f8bff01427c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7522
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Unlike the Scoped* types, bssl::UniquePtr is available to C++ users, and
offered for a large variety of types. The 'extern "C++"' trick is used
to make the C++ bits digestible to C callers that wrap header files in
'extern "C"'.
Change-Id: Ifbca4c2997d6628e33028c7d7620c72aff0f862e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10521
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We currently have the situation where the |tool| and |bssl_shim| code
includes scoped_types.h from crypto/test and ssl/test. That's weird and
shouldn't happen. Also, our C++ consumers might quite like to have
access to the scoped types.
Thus this change moves some of the template code to base.h and puts it
all in a |bssl| namespace to prepare for scattering these types into
their respective headers. In order that all the existing test code be
able to access these types, it's all moved into the same namespace.
Change-Id: I3207e29474dc5fcc344ace43119df26dae04eabb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
A lot of consumers of obj.h only want the NID values. Others didn't need
it at all. This also removes some OBJ_nid2sn and OBJ_nid2ln calls in EVP
error paths which isn't worth pulling a large table in for.
BUG=chromium:499653
Change-Id: Id6dff578f993012e35b740a13b8e4f9c2edc0744
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7563
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I0effe99d244c4ccdbb0e34db6e01a59c9463cb15
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7572
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Conscrypt, thanks to Java's RSAPrivateKeySpec API, must be able to use RSA keys
with only modulus and exponent. This is kind of silly and breaks the blinding
code so they, both in OpenSSL and BoringSSL, had to explicitly turn blinding
off.
Add a test for this as we're otherwise sure to break it on accident.
We may wish to avoid the silly rsa->flags modification, I'm not sure. For now,
keep the requirement in so other consumers do not accidentally rely on this.
(Also add a few missing ERR_clear_error calls. Functions which are expected to
fail should be followed by an ERR_clear_error so later unexpected failures
don't get confused.)
BUG=boringssl:12
Change-Id: I674349821f1f59292b8edd085f21dc37e8bcaa75
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7560
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We should reject RSA public keys with exponents of less than 3.
This change also rejects even exponents, although the usefulness
of such a public key is somewhat questionable.
BUG=chromium:541257
Change-Id: I1499e9762ba40a7cf69155d21d55bc210cd6d273
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6710
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I799e289a402612446e08f64f59e0243f164cf695
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6372
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I48885402b88309bb514554d209e1827d31738756
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6211
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
- Pass in the right ciphertext length to ensure we're indeed testing
ciphertext corruption (and not truncation).
- Only test one mutation per byte to not make the test too slow.
- Add a separate test for truncated ciphertexts.
(Imported from upstream's 5f623eb61655688501cb1817a7ad0592299d894a.)
Change-Id: I425a77668beac9d391387e3afad8d15ae387468f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5945
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Estonian IDs issued between September 2014 to September 2015 are broken and use
negative moduli. They last five years and are common enough that we need to
work around this bug.
Add parallel "buggy" versions of BN_cbs2unsigned and RSA_parse_public_key which
tolerate this mistake, to align with OpenSSL's previous behavior. This code is
currently hooked up to rsa_pub_decode in RSA_ASN1_METHOD so that d2i_X509 is
tolerant. (This isn't a huge deal as the rest of that stack still uses the
legacy ASN.1 code which is overly lenient in many other ways.)
In future, when Chromium isn't using crypto/x509 and has more unified
certificate handling code, we can put client certificates under a slightly
different codepath, so this needn't hold for all certificates forever. Then in
September 2019, when the broken Estonian certificates all expire, we can purge
this codepath altogether.
BUG=532048
Change-Id: Iadb245048c71dba2eec45dd066c4a6e077140751
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5894
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes the version field from RSA and instead handles versioning
as part of parsing. (As a bonus, we now correctly limit multi-prime RSA
to version 1 keys.)
Most consumers are also converted. old_rsa_priv_{de,en}code are left
alone for now. Those hooks are passed in parameters which match the old
d2i/i2d pattern (they're only used in d2i_PrivateKey and
i2d_PrivateKey).
Include a test which, among other things, checks that public keys being
serialized as private keys are handled properly.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: Icdd5f0382c4a84f9c8867024f29756e1a306ba08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5273
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
While I'm here, make them consistent with the keys.
Change-Id: Ib2804dd4f18bbb3b3735fb7772fca590e0d6d624
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5266
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They weren't valid DER. Some lengths were encoded with one more byte
than necessary.
Change-Id: I94c8c525ade835fdeca115af98ab7e5910d2aeb2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5265
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In doing so, check for malloc failures and use scopers as appropriate.
This should clear rsa_test for use with malloc tests. Also replace the
SetKey macro and exploded RSA keys with a DER RSAPrivateKey structure.
Much less tedious.
Change-Id: I3ce092ef67e7ac2af74f509abbdf84b7f2b6d45d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5043
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
