The previous attempt around the 'struct ssl_st' compatibility mess
offended OSS-Fuzz and UBSan because one compilation unit passed a
function pointer with ssl_st* and another called it with
bssl::SSLConnection*.
Linkers don't retain such types, of course, but to silence this alert,
instead make C-visible types be separate from the implementation and
subclass the public type. This does mean we risk polluting the symbol
namespace, but hopefully the compiler is smart enough to inline the
visible struct's constructor and destructor.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ia75a89b3a22a202883ad671a630b72d0aeef680e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18224
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This adds several utilities as replacements for new and delete and makes
bssl::UniquePtr work with our private types.
Later work can convert more incrementally. I did this one more
aggressively to see how it'd work. Unfortunately, in doing so, I needed
to remove the NULL SSL_AEAD_CTX "method" receiver trick to appease
clang. The null cipher is now represented by a concrete SSL_AEAD_CTX.
The long-lived references to SSL_AEAD_CTX are not yet in types with
constructors, so they still bare Delete rather than UniquePtr for now.
Though this does mean we may be able to move the sequence number into
SSLAEADContext later which is one less object for DTLS to carry around.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I506b404addafb692055d5709b0ca6d5439a4e6be
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18164
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This is horrible, but everything else I tried was worse. The goal with
this CL is to take the extern "C" out of ssl/internal.h and move most
symbols to namespace bssl, so we can start using C++ helpers and
destructors without worry.
Complications:
- Public API functions must be extern "C" and match their declaration in
ssl.h, which is unnamespaced. C++ really does not want you to
interleave namespaced and unnamespaced things. One can actually write
a namespaced extern "C" function, but this means, from C++'s
perspective, the function is namespaced. Trying to namespace the
public header would worked but ended up too deep a rabbithole.
- Our STACK_OF macros do not work right in namespaces.
- The typedefs for our exposed but opaque types are visible in the
header files and copied into consuming projects as forward
declarations. We ultimately want to give SSL a destructor, but
clobbering an unnamespaced ssl_st::~ssl_st seems bad manners.
- MSVC complains about ambiguous names if one typedefs SSL to bssl::SSL.
This CL opts for:
- ssl/*.cc must begin with #define BORINGSSL_INTERNAL_CXX_TYPES. This
informs the public headers to create forward declarations which are
compatible with our namespaces.
- For now, C++-defined type FOO ends up at bssl::FOO with a typedef
outside. Later I imagine we'll rename many of them.
- Internal functions get namespace bssl, so we stop worrying about
stomping the tls1_prf symbol. Exported C functions are stuck as they
are. Rather than try anything weird, bite the bullet and reorder files
which have a mix of public and private functions. I expect that over
time, the public functions will become fairly small as we move logic
to more idiomatic C++.
Files without any public C functions can just be written normally.
- To avoid MSVC troubles, some bssl types are renamed to CPlusPlusStyle
in advance of them being made idiomatic C++.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ic931895e117c38b14ff8d6e5a273e868796c7581
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18124
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Clang for Windows does not like OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT inside a function
in C++. It complains that the struct is unused. I think we worked around
this in C previously by making it expand to C11 _Static_assert when
available.
But libssl is now C++ and assumes a C++11-capable compiler. Use real
static_assert.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I6aceb95360244bd2c80d194b80676483abb60519
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17924
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This plumbs EVP_AEAD_CTX_seal_scatter all the way through to
tls_record.c, so we can add a new zero-copy record sealing method on top
of the existing code.
Change-Id: I01fdd88abef5442dc16605ea31b29b4b1231c073
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17684
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I0b83bb05082aa6dad8c15f906cebc2d4f2d5216b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17764
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
