SSL_peek works fine for us, but OpenSSL 1.1.0 regressed this
(https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/1563), and we don't have
tests either. Fix this.
SSL_peek can handle all weird events that SSL_read can, so use runner
and tell bssl_shim to do a SSL_peek + SSL_peek + SSL_read instead of
SSL_read. Then add tests for all the events we may discover.
Change-Id: I9e8635e3ca19653a02a883f220ab1332d4412f98
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11090
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Upstream makes 0 mean "min/max supported version". Match that behavior,
although call it "default" instead. It shouldn't get you TLS 1.3 until
we're ready to turn it on everywhere.
BUG=90
Change-Id: I9f122fceb701b7d4de2ff70afbc1ffdf370cb97e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11181
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We'd previously been assuming we'd want to predict P-256 and X25519 but,
on reflection, that's nonsense. Although, today, P-256 is widespread and
X25519 is less so, that's not the right question to ask. Those servers
are all 1.2.
The right question is whether we believe enough servers will get to TLS
1.3 before X25519 to justify wasting 64 bytes on all other connections.
Given that OpenSSL has already shipped X25519 and Microsoft was doing
interop testing on X25519 around when we were shipping it, I think the
answer is no.
Moreover, if we are wrong, it will be easier to go from predicting one
group to two rather than the inverse (provided we send a fake one with
GREASE). I anticipate prediction-miss HelloRetryRequest logic across the
TLS/TCP ecosystem will be largely untested (no one wants to pay an RTT),
so taking a group out of the predicted set will likely be a risky
operation.
Only predicting one group also makes things a bit simpler. I haven't
done this here, but we'll be able to fold the 1.2 and 1.3 ecdh_ctx's
together, even.
Change-Id: Ie7e42d3105aca48eb9d97e2e05a16c5379aa66a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10960
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The old numbers violate a MUST-level requirement in TLS 1.2 to not
advertise anonymous (0x0700 ends in 0x00). The spec has been updated
with new allocations which avoid these.
BUG=webrtc:6342
Change-Id: Ia5663ada98fa1ebf0f8a7f50fe74a0e9206c4194
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11131
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Found by libFuzzer and then one more mistake caught by valgrind. Add a
test for this case.
Change-Id: I92773bc1231bafe5fc069e8568d93ac0df4c8acb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11129
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Upstream added these functions after we did but decided to change the
names slightly. I'm not sure why they wanted to add the "proto" in
there, but align with them nonetheless so the ecosystem only has one set
of these functions.
BUG=90
Change-Id: Ia9863c58c9734374092051f02952b112806040cc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11123
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is in preparation for using the supported_versions extension to
experiment with draft TLS 1.3 versions, since we don't wish to restore
the fallback. With versions begin opaque values, we will want
version_from_wire to reject unknown values, not attempt to preserve
order in some way.
This means ClientHello.version processing needs to be separate code.
That's just written out fully in negotiate_version now. It also means
SSL_set_{min,max}_version will notice invalid inputs which aligns us
better with upstream's versions of those APIs.
This CL doesn't replace ssl->version with an internal-representation
version, though follow work should do it once a couple of changes land
in consumers.
BUG=90
Change-Id: Id2f5e1fa72847c823ee7f082e9e69f55e51ce9da
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11122
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This will make it a little easier to store the normalized version rather
than the wire version. Also document the V2ClientHello behavior.
Change-Id: I5ce9ccce44ca48be2e60ddf293c0fab6bba1356e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11121
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Passing --quiet makes valgrind only print out errors, so we don't need
to suppress things. Combine that with checking valgrind's dedicated exit
code so we notice errors that happen before the "---DONE---" marker.
This makes that marker unnecessary for valgrind. all_tests.go was not
sensitive to this, but still would do well to have valgrind be silent.
Change-Id: I841edf7de87081137e38990e647e989fd7567295
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11128
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If the test failed due to non-ASan reasons but ASan also had errors,
output those too.
Change-Id: Id908fe2a823c59255c6a9585dfaa894a4fcd9f59
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11127
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Runner needs to implement fuzzer mode as well so we can record
transcripts from it. A bunch of tests were failing:
- C and Go disagreed on what fuzzer mode did to TLS 1.3 padding. So we
fuzz more code, align Go with C. Fuzzer mode TLS 1.3 still pads but
just skips the final AEAD.
- The deterministic RNG should be applied per test, not per exchange. It
turns out, if your RNG is deterministic, one tends to pick the same
session ID over and over which confuses clients. (Resumption is
signaled by echoing the session ID.)
Now the only failing tests are the ones one would expect to fail.
BUG=79
Change-Id: Ica23881a6e726adae71e6767730519214ebcd62a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11126
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If we see garbage in ClientHello.version and then select static RSA,
that garbage is what goes in the premaster.
Change-Id: I65190a44439745e6b5ffaf7669f063da725c8097
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11092
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Plain PSK omits the ServerKeyExchange when there is no hint and includes
it otherwise (it should have always sent it), while other PSK ciphers
like ECDHE_PSK cannot omit the hint. Having different capabilities here
is odd and RFC 4279 5.2 suggests that all PSK ciphers are capable of
"[not] provid[ing] an identity hint".
Interpret this to mean no identity hint and empty identity hint are the
same state. Annoyingly, this gives a plain PSK implementation two
options for spelling an empty hint. The spec isn't clear and this is not
really a battle worth fighting, so I've left both acceptable and added a
test for this case.
See also https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/275217/. This is also
consistent with Android's PskKeyManager API, our only consumer anyway.
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/net/PskKeyManager.html
Change-Id: I8a8e6cc1f7dd1b8b202cdaf3d4f151bebfb4a25b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11087
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
One less field to reset on renego and save a pointer of post-handshake
memory.
Change-Id: Ifc0c3c73072af244ee3848d9a798988d2c8a7c38
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11086
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This isn't hugely important since the hs object will actually be
released at the end of the handshake, but no sense in holding on to them
longer than needed.
Also release |public_key| when we no longer need it and document what
the fields mean.
Change-Id: If677cb4a915c75405dabe7135205630527afd8bc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10360
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
access_denied is only used to indicate client cert errors and Chrome
maps it to ERR_SSL_BAD_CLIENT_AUTH_CERT accordingly:
access_denied
A valid certificate was received, but when access control was
applied, the sender decided not to proceed with negotiation. This
message is always fatal.
We don't appear to be the cause of Chrome's recent
ERR_SSL_BAD_CLIENT_AUTH_CERT spike, but we should send these correctly
nonetheless.
If the early callback fails, handshake_failure seems the most
appropriate ("I was unable to find suitable parameters"). There isn't
really an alert that matches DoS, but internal_error seems okay?
internal_error
An internal error unrelated to the peer or the correctness of the
protocol (such as a memory allocation failure) makes it impossible
to continue. This message is always fatal.
There's nothing wrong, per se, with your ClientHello, but I just can't
deal with it right now. Please go away.
Change-Id: Icd1c998c09dc42daa4b309c1a4a0f136b85eb69d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11084
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This withdraws support for -DBORINGSSL_ENABLE_RC4_TLS, and removes the
RC4 AEADs.
Change-Id: I1321b76bfe047d180743fa46d1b81c5d70c64e81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10940
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Conscrypt would like to write a CTS test that the callback isn't set
unexpectedly.
Change-Id: I11f987422daf0544e90f5cff4d7aaf557ac1f5a2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11060
Reviewed-by: Kenny Root <kroot@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I'm not sure what happened here. These are both the same as
MissingKeyShare-Client.
Change-Id: I6601ed378d8639c1b59034f1e96c09a683bb62ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11007
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reason for revert: Right now in TLS 1.3, certificate_auth is exactly
the same as whether we're doing resumption. With the weird reauth
stuff punted to later in the spec, having extra state is just more
room for bugs to creep in.
Original issue's description:
> Determining certificate_auth and key_exchange based on SSL.
>
> This allows us to switch TLS 1.3 to use non-cipher based negotiation
> without needing to use separate functions between 1.3 and below.
>
> BUG=77
>
> Change-Id: I9207e7a6793cb69e8300e2c15afe3548cbf82af2
> Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10803
> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
>
Change-Id: I240e3ee959ffd1f2481a06eabece3af554d20ffa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11008
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It's easy to forget to check those. Unfortunately, it's also easy to
forget to check inner structures, which is going to be harder to stress,
but do these to start with. In doing, so fix up and unify some
error-handling, and add a missing check when parsing TLS 1.2
CertificateRequest.
This was also inspired by the recent IETF posting.
Change-Id: I27fe3cd3506258389a75d486036388400f0a33ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10963
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This will let us use the same test scenarios for testing messages with
trailing garbage or skipped messages.
Change-Id: I9f177983e8dabb6c94d3d8443d224b79a58f40b1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10962
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was done just by grepping for 'size_t i;' and 'size_t j;'. I left
everything in crypto/x509 and friends alone.
There's some instances in gcm.c that are non-trivial and pulled into a
separate CL for ease of review.
Change-Id: I6515804e3097f7e90855f1e7610868ee87117223
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I676d7fb00d63d74946b96c22ae2705072033c5f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10620
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This allows us to switch TLS 1.3 to use non-cipher based negotiation
without needing to use separate functions between 1.3 and below.
BUG=77
Change-Id: I9207e7a6793cb69e8300e2c15afe3548cbf82af2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10803
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This simplifies the logic around SSL_clear to reset the state for a new
handshake. The state around here is still a little iffy, but this is a
slight improvement.
The SSL_ST_CONNECT and SSL_ST_ACCEPT states are still kept separate to
avoid problems with the info callback reporting SSL_ST_INIT. Glancing
through info callback consumers, although they're all debugging, they
tend to assume that all intermediate states either have only
SSL_ST_CONNECT set or only SSL_ST_ACCEPT set.
(They also all look identical which makes me think it's copy-and-pasted
from OpenSSL command-line tool or something.)
Change-Id: I55503781e52b51b4ca829256c14de6f5942dae51
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10760
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This mechanism is incompatible with deploying draft versions of TLS 1.3.
Suppose a draft M client talks to a draft N server, M != N. (Either M or
N could also be the final standard revision should there be lingering
draft clients or servers.) The server will notice the mismatch and
pretend ClientHello.version is TLS 1.2, not TLS 1.3. But this will
trigger anti-downgrade signal and cause an interop failure! And if it
doesn't trigger, all the clever tricks around ServerHello.random being
signed in TLS 1.2 are moot.
We'll put this back when the dust has settled.
Change-Id: Ic3cf72b7c31ba91e5cca0cfd7a3fca830c493a43
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11005
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Not that this matters in the slightest, but the recent IETF mailing
reminded me we don't test this.
Change-Id: I300c96d6a63733d538a7019a7cb74d4e65d0498f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10961
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Although RFC 6066 recommends against it, some servers send a warning
alert prior to ServerHello on SNI mismatch, and, per spec, TLS 1.2
allows it.
We're fine here, but add a test for it. It interacts interestingly with
TLS 1.3 forbidding warning alerts because it happens before version
negotiation.
Change-Id: I0032313c986c835b6ae1aa43da6ee0dad17a97c2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10800
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Now that we have the extern "C++" trick, we can just embed them in the
normal headers. Move the EVP_CIPHER_CTX deleter to cipher.h and, in
doing so, take away a little bit of boilerplate in defining deleters.
Change-Id: I4a4b8d0db5274a3607914d94e76a38996bd611ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10804
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I00507014c55b2c7fd442a5aa2c3afcbf8c48049b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10741
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Unlike the Scoped* types, bssl::UniquePtr is available to C++ users, and
offered for a large variety of types. The 'extern "C++"' trick is used
to make the C++ bits digestible to C callers that wrap header files in
'extern "C"'.
Change-Id: Ifbca4c2997d6628e33028c7d7620c72aff0f862e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10521
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Add a test that RSA-PSS is available in TLS 1.2 by default, both for
signing and verifying. Note that if a custom SSL_PRIVATE_KEY_METHOD is
used and it sets signing preferences, it won't use RSA-PSS if it doesn't
know about it. (See *-Sign-Negotiate-* tests.)
Change-Id: I3776a0c95480188a135795f7ebf31f2b0e0626cc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10723
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The early callback needs to run before even version negotiation has been
resolved.
Change-Id: Ibb449ccec07dedef19b7827400ef318fa2f422c0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10722
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Changing parameters on renegotiation makes all our APIs confusing. This
one has no reason to change, so lock it down. In particular, our
preference to forbid Token Binding + renego may be overridden at the
IETF, even though it's insane. Loosening it will be a bit less of a
headache if EMS can't change.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/unbearable/current/msg00690.html
claims that this is already in the specification and enforced by NSS. I
can't find anything to this effect in the specification. It just says
the client MUST disable renegotiation when EMS is missing, which is
wishful thinking. At a glance, NSS doesn't seem to check, though I could
be misunderstanding the code.
Nonetheless, locking this down is a good idea anyway. Accurate or not,
take the email as an implicit endorsement of this from Mozilla.
Change-Id: I236b05991d28bed199763dcf2f47bbfb9d0322d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10721
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
For now, they can be restored by compiling with -DBORINGSSL_RC4_TLS.
Of note, this means that `MEDIUM' is now empty.
Change-Id: Ic77308e7bd4849bdb2b4882c6b34af85089fe3cc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10580
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If code tries to inspect the verify result in the case of a failure then
it seems reasonable that the error code should be in there.
Change-Id: Ic32ac9d340c2c10a405a7b6580f22a06427f041d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10641
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
4aa154e08f changed the code to assume that
a session callback will zero the |copy| out-arg before returning NULL.
In practice this doesn't always happen and we should be robust against
it.
Change-Id: I0fd14969df836e0fa4f68ded8648fea8094ff9d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10640
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
To ease the removal of RC4, use 3DES in cases where RC4 is not required,
but is just a placeholder for "ciphersuite that works in SSLv3."
Change-Id: Ib459173e68a662986235b556f330a7e0e02759d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10523
Commit-Queue: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
nginx consumes these error codes without #ifdefs. Continue to define
them for compatibility, even though we never emit them.
BUG=95
Change-Id: I1e991987ce25fc4952cc85b98ffa050a8beab92e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10446
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
peer_sigalgs should live on SSL_HANDSHAKE. This both releases a little
bit of memory after the handshake is over and also avoids the bug where
the sigalgs get dropped if SSL_set_SSL_CTX is called at a bad time. See
also upstream's 14e14bf6964965d02ce89805d9de867f000095aa.
This only affects consumers using the old SNI callback and not
select_certificate_cb.
Add a test that the SNI callback works as expected. In doing so, add an
SSL_CTX version of the signing preferences API. This is a property of
the cert/key pair (really just the key) and should be tied to that. This
makes it a bit easier to have the regression test work with TLS 1.2 too.
I thought we'd fixed this already, but apparently not... :-/
BUG=95
Change-Id: I75b02fad4059e6aa46c3b05183a07d72880711b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10445
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
None of these extensions may be negotiated in TLS 1.3 and are otherwise
on by default. Make the future QUIC/TLS1.3 ClientHello a hair smaller.
Change-Id: I613c339d95470676c78f21fd29e888b7701692c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10504
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Apparently we forgot to do this.
Change-Id: I348cf6d716ae888fddce69ba4801bf09446f5a72
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10503
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Chromium has switched to better APIs.
Change-Id: I26209b3a03c6a0db1ddce2f1fc99c8750cf6e56a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10501
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ie60744761f5aa434a71a998f5ca98a8f8b1c25d5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10447
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I'll hold on regenerating the transcripts until either the protocol has
stablized more or we're ready to start actually deploying some of this,
but we can get this in now.
Confirmed these #ifdef points are covered by tests:
- BadFinished-*-TLS13
- *-InvalidSignature-*-TLS13
BUG=79
Change-Id: I5f6b9d0f50ac33d5cc79688928fb3fdf6df845ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10500
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
However, for now, we will only enable it if TLS 1.3 is offered.
BUG=85
Change-Id: I958ae0adeafee553dbffb966a6fa41f8a81cef96
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10342
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
