Move to explicit hashing everywhere, matching TLS 1.2 with TLS 1.3. The
ssl_get_message calls between all the handshake states are now all
uniform so, when we're ready, we can rewire the TLS 1.2 state machine to
look like the TLS 1.3 one. (ssl_get_message calls become an
ssl_hs_read_message transition, reuse_message becomes an ssl_hs_ok
transition.)
This avoids some nuisance in processing the ServerHello at the 1.2 / 1.3
transition.
The downside of explicit hashing is we may forget to hash something, but
this will fail to interop with our tests and anyone else, so we should
be able to catch it.
BUG=128
Change-Id: I01393943b14dfaa98eec2a78f62c3a41c29b3a0e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13266
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is kind of annoying (even new state is needed to keep the layering
right). As part of aligning the read paths of the TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3
state machine, we'll want to move to states calling
ssl_hash_current_message when the process the message, rather than when
the message is read. Right now the TLS 1.2 optional message story
(reuse_message) depends on all messages preceded by an optional message
using ssl_hash_message. For instance, if TLS 1.2 decided to place
CertificateStatus before ServerKeyExchange, we would not be able to
handle it.
However, V2ClientHello, by being handled in the message layer, relies on
ssl_get_message-driven hashing to replace the usual ClientHello hash
with a hash of something custom. This switches things so rather than
ClientHellos being always pre-hashed by the message layer, simulated
ClientHellos no-op ssl_hash_current_message.
This just replaces one hack with another (V2ClientHello is inherently
nasty), but this hack should be more compatible with future plans.
BUG=128
Change-Id: If807ea749d91e306a37bb2362ecc69b84bf224c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13265
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This aligns the TLS 1.2 state machine closer with the TLS 1.3 state
machine. This is more work for the handshake, but ultimately the
plan is to take the ssl_get_message call out of the handshake (so it is
just the state machine rather than calling into BIO), so the parameters
need to be folded out as in TLS 1.3.
The WrongMessageType-* family of tests should make sure we don't miss
one of these.
BUG=128
Change-Id: I17a1e6177c52a7540b2bc6b0b3f926ab386c4950
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13264
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If an existing chain had a NULL placeholder for a leaf we could end up
trying to increment its reference count. That results in a crash at
configuration time. Found via the SSL_CTX API fuzzer.
BUG=oss-fuzz:480
Change-Id: I0ddc2cbde2e625015768f1bdc8da625e8a4f05fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13383
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was originally changed so that flush_flight could forward BIO_write
errors as-is, but we can and probably should still map BIO_flush errors.
This is unlikely to matter (every relevant BIO likely just has a no-op
flush which returns one), but, e.g., our file BIO returns 0, not -1, on
error.
We possibly should also be mapping BIO_write errors, but I'll leave that
alone for now. It's primarily BIO_read where the BIO return value must
be preserved due to error vs. EOF.
(We probably can just remove the BIO_flush calls altogether, but since
the buffer BIO forwarded the flush signal it would be a user-visible
behavior change to confirm.)
Change-Id: Ib495cc5d043867cf964f99b7ee4535114f7b2230
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13367
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(I split this change off to minimise the noise in future diffs that
actually do something meaningful.)
Change-Id: I7a054dcfc90a44ab5bb89b8f46704e5e3410e524
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13364
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change converts the |CERT| struct to holding certificates as binary
blobs, rather than in parsed form. The members for holding the parsed
form are still there, however, but are only used as a cache for the
event that someone asks us for a non-owning pointer to the parsed leaf
or chain.
Next steps:
* Move more functions in to ssl_x509.c
* Create an X509_OPS struct of function pointers that will hang off
the |SSL_METHOD| to abstract out the current calls to crypto/x509
operations.
BUG=chromium:671420
Change-Id: Ifa05d88c49a987fd561b349705c9c48f106ec868
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13280
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This resolves a TODO, trims per-connection memory, and makes more sense.
These masks have nothing to do with certificate configuration.
Change-Id: I783e6158e51f58cce88e3e68dfa0ed965bdc894c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13368
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Until we've gotten it fully working, we should not mint any of these
SSL_SESSIONs, to avoid constraining future versions of our client code.
Notably, if any of our TLS 1.3 clients today serialized sessions, we
would need to rev the serialization format. Without opting into 0-RTT, a
TLS 1.3 client will create SSL_SESSIONs tagged as 0-RTT-capable but
missing important fields (ALPN, etc.). When that serialized session
makes its way to a future version of our client code, it would disagree
with the server about the ALPN value stored in the ticket and cause
interop failures.
I believe the only client code enabling TLS 1.3 right now is Chrome, and
the window is small, so it should be fine. But fix this now before it
becomes a problem.
Change-Id: Ie2b109f8d158017a6f3b4cb6169050d38a66b31c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13342
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I324743e7d1864fbbb9653209ff93e4da872c8d31
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13340
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idc93fdca2f1c5c23e4ba48c4efed2edbad1e857b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12521
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The TLS 1.2 state machine now looks actually much closer to the TLS 1.3
one on the write side. Although the write states still have a BIO-style
return, they don't actually send anything anymore. Only the BIO flush
state does. Reads are still integrated into the states themselves
though, so I haven't made it match TLS 1.3 yet.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I7708162efca13cd335723efa5080718a5f2808ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13228
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The SSL code suffers from needing too many verbs for variations on
writing things without actually writing them. We used to have queuing
the message up to be written to the buffer BIO, writing to the buffer
BIO, and flushing the buffer BIO. (Reading, conversely, has a similar
mess of verbs.)
Now we just have adding to the pending flight and flushing the pending
flight, match the SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD naming.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I332966928bf13f03dfb8eddd519c2fefdd7f24d4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13227
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Large chunks of contiguous messages can now be sent in a row. Notably,
the ServerHello flight involves a number of optional messages which can
now be collapsed into straight-line code.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I1429d22a12401aa0f811a04e495bd5d754c084a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13226
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
On the TLS side, we introduce a running buffer of ciphertext. Queuing up
pending data consists of encrypting the record into the buffer. This
effectively reimplements what the buffer BIO was doing previously, but
this resizes to fit the whole flight.
As part of this, rename all the functions to add to the pending flight
to be more uniform. This CL proposes "add_foo" to add to the pending
flight and "flush_flight" to drain it.
We add an add_alert hook for alerts but, for now, only the SSL 3.0
warning alert (sent mid-handshake) uses this mechanism. Later work will
push this down to the rest of the write path so closure alerts use it
too, as in DTLS. The intended end state is that all the ssl_buffer.c and
wpend_ret logic will only be used for application data and eventually
optionally replaced by the in-place API, while all "incidental" data
will be handled internally.
For now, the two buffers are mutually exclusive. Moving closure alerts
to "incidentals" will change this, but flushing application data early
is tricky due to wpend_ret. (If we call ssl_write_buffer_flush,
do_ssl3_write doesn't realize it still has a wpend_ret to replay.) That
too is all left alone in this change.
To keep the diff down, write_message is retained for now and will be
removed from the state machines in a follow-up change.
BUG=72
Change-Id: Ibce882f5f7196880648f25d5005322ca4055c71d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13224
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Instead, "writing" a message merely adds it to the outgoing_messages
structure. The code to write the flight then loops over it all and now
shares code with retransmission. The verbs here are all a little odd,
but they'll be fixed in later commits.
In doing so, this fixes a slight miscalculation of the record-layer
overhead when retransmitting a flight that spans two epochs. (We'd use
the encrypted epoch's overhead for the unencrypted epoch.)
BUG=72
Change-Id: I8ac897c955cc74799f8b5ca6923906e97d6dad17
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13223
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was replaced by the more general CLIENT_RANDOM scheme that records
the master secret. Support was added in Wireshark 1.8.0, released in
June 2012. At this point, ECDHE is sufficiently widely deployed that
anyone that cares about this feature must have upgraded their Wireshark
by now.
Change-Id: I9b708f245ec8728c1999daf91aca663be7d25661
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13263
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This will let us avoid a scratch buffer when assembling DTLS handshake
packets in the write_message-less flow.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I15e78efe3a9e3933c307e599f0043427330f4a9e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13262
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We need to suppress a few tests on the system Android build until
RSA-PSS is shipped there.
Change-Id: I5843997aae9fa499ec08d76f44fdf3b523599e1c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13267
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifc28887cbf91c7a80bdaf56e3bf80b2f8cfa7d53
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13260
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Eventually, all uses of crypto/x509 will be from ssl_x509.c, but this is
just a start.
Change-Id: I2f38cdcbf18b1f26add0aac10a70af10a79dee0e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13242
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the first part to removing the buffer BIO. The eventual end
state is the SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD is responsible for maintaining one
flight's worth of messages. In TLS, it will just be a buffer containing
the flight's ciphertext. In DTLS, it's the existing structure for
retransmit purposes. There will be hooks:
- add_message (synchronous)
- add_change_cipher_spec (synchronous)
- add_warning_alert (synchronous; needed until we lose SSLv3 client auth
and TLS 1.3 draft 18; draft 19 will switch end_of_early_data to a
handshake message)
- write_flight (BIO; flush_flight will be renamed to this)
This also preserves the exact return value of BIO_flush. Eventually all
the BIO_write calls will be hidden behind BIO_flush to, to be consistent
with other BIO-based calls, preserve the return value.
BUG=72
Change-Id: I74cd23759a17356aab3bb475a8ea42bd2cd115c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13222
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
EVP_parse_public_key already acts like CBS_get_* in that it peels one
element off and leaves a remainder.
Change-Id: Ic90952785005ed81664a6f46503b13ecd293176c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13045
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
For now, this is the laziest conversion possible. The intent is to just
get the build setup ready so that we can get everything working in our
consumers. The intended end state is:
- The standalone build produces three test targets, one per library:
{crypto,ssl,decrepit}_tests.
- Each FOO_test is made up of:
FOO/**/*_test.cc
crypto/test/gtest_main.cc
test_support
- generate_build_files.py emits variables crypto_test_sources and
ssl_test_sources. These variables are populated with FindCFiles,
looking for *_test.cc.
- The consuming file assembles those variables into the two test targets
(plus decrepit) from there. This avoids having generate_build_files.py
emit actual build rules.
- Our standalone builders, Chromium, and Android just run the top-level
test targets using whatever GTest-based reporting story they have.
In transition, we start by converting one of two tests in each library
to populate the three test targets. Those are added to all_tests.json
and all_tests.go hacked to handle them transparently. This keeps our
standalone builder working.
generate_build_files.py, to start with, populates the new source lists
manually and subtracts them out of the old machinery. We emit both for
the time being. When this change rolls in, we'll write all the build
glue needed to build the GTest-based tests and add it to consumers'
continuous builders.
Next, we'll subsume a file-based test and get the consumers working with
that. (I.e. make sure the GTest targets can depend on a data file.)
Once that's all done, we'll be sure all this will work. At that point,
we start subsuming the remaining tests into the GTest targets and,
asynchronously, rewriting tests to use GTest properly rather than
cursory conversion here.
When all non-GTest tests are gone, the old generate_build_files.py hooks
will be removed, consumers updated to not depend on them, and standalone
builders converted to not rely on all_tests.go, which can then be
removed. (Unless bits end up being needed as a malloc test driver. I'm
thinking we'll want to do something with --gtest_filter.)
As part of this CL, I've bumped the CMake requirements (for
target_include_directories) and added a few suppressions for warnings
that GTest doesn't pass.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I881b26b07a8739cc0b52dbb51a30956908e1b71a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13232
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's not completely clear to me why select_cetificate_cb behaves the way it
does, however not only is it confusing, but it makes assumptions about the
application using BoringSSL (it's not always possible to implement custom
logic outside of the callbacks provided by libssl), that make this callback
somewhat useless.
Case in point, the callback can be used for changing min/max protocol versions
based on per-site policies, and select_certificate_cb is the only place where
SSL_set_min/max_proto_version() can be used (e.g. you can't call them in
cert_cb because it's too late), but the decision on the specific versions to
use might depend on configuration that needs retrieving asynchronously from
over the network, which requires re-running the callback multiple times.
Change-Id: Ia8e151b163628545373e7fd1f327e9af207478a6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13000
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We have a test somewhere which tries to read off of it. Align the getter
roughly with upstream's SSL_SESSION_get0_id_context (which we don't
currently expose).
BUG=6
Change-Id: Iab240868838ba56c1f08d112888d9536574347b4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12636
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
BUG=chromium:682816
Change-Id: I2345d6db83441691fe0c1ab6d7c6da4d24777849
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13203
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commit def9b46801.
(I should have uploaded a new version before sending to the commit queue.)
Change-Id: Iaead89c8d7fc1f56e6294d869db9238b467f520a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13202
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TLS 1.3 forbids warning alerts, and sending these is a bad idea. Per RFC
6066:
If the server understood the ClientHello extension but
does not recognize the server name, the server SHOULD take one of two
actions: either abort the handshake by sending a fatal-level
unrecognized_name(112) alert or continue the handshake. It is NOT
RECOMMENDED to send a warning-level unrecognized_name(112) alert,
because the client's behavior in response to warning-level alerts is
unpredictable.
The motivation is to cut down on the number of places where we send
non-closing alerts. We can't remove them yet (SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.3 draft
18 need to go), but eventually this can be a simplifying assumption.
Already this means DTLS never sends warning alerts, which is good
because DTLS can't retransmit them.
Change-Id: I577a1eb9c23e66d28235c0fbe913f00965e19486
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13221
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This doesn't do anything useful. Every caller either never sets the
callback as a client or goes out of their way to filter out clients in
the callback.
Change-Id: I6f07d000a727f9ccba080f812e6b8e7a38e04350
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13220
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
Change-Id: Icd9c2117c657f3aa6df55990c618d562194ef0e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13201
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is to make sure all of libssl's consumers' have sufficiently
reasonable toolchains. Once this bakes, we can go about moving
libssl to C++.
This is just starting with libssl for now because libcrypto has more
consumers and libssl would benefit more from C++ than libcrypto (though
libcrypto also has code that would benefit).
BUG=132
Change-Id: Ie02f7b0a8a95defd289cc7e62451d4b16408ca2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13161
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia6598ee4b2d4623abfc140d6a5c0eca4bcb30427
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13180
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These are no longer needed.
Change-Id: I909f7d690f57dafcdad6254948b5683757da69f4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13160
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The last one was an RC4 cipher and those are gone.
Change-Id: I3473937ff6f0634296fc75a346627513c5970ddb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13108
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This gives coverage over needing to fragment something over multiple
records.
Change-Id: I2373613608ef669358d48f4e12f68577fa5a40dc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13101
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
TLS 1.3 doesn't support renegotiation in the first place, but so callers
don't report TLS 1.3 servers as missing it, always report it as
(vacuously) protected against this bug.
BUG=chromium:680281
Change-Id: Ibfec03102b2aec7eaa773c331d6844292e7bb685
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13046
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
08b65f4e31 introduced a memory leak and
also got enums confused. Also fix a codepath that was missing an error
code.
Thanks to OSS-Fuzz which appears to have found it in a matter of hours.
Change-Id: Ia9e926c28a01daab3e6154d363d0acda91209a22
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13104
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This adds support for setting 0-RTT mode on tickets minted by
BoringSSL, allowing for testing of the initial handshake knowledge.
BUG=76
Change-Id: Ic199842c03b5401ef122a537fdb7ed9e9a5c635a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12740
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
As long as we still have this code, we should make sure it doesn't
regress.
Change-Id: I0290792aedcf667ec49b251d747ffbc141c0cec4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13053
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_write is remarkably complicated.
Change-Id: I1cb8d00af1b4c5e2d90187d5f87951f25e27f224
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13050
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Instead, add ssl_has_certificate to the ssl3_send_cert_verify check. If
writing the empty Certificate does not complete synchronously (it almost
always does due to the buffer BIO), but if the buffer boundary is at
exactly the wrong place, write_message will need a retry but, having
cleared cert_request, we never re-enter ssl3_send_client_certificate.
This will later be moot when we've gotten rid of the buffer BIO, but
this is cleaner anyway and is closer to the TLS 1.3 code.
With this change, blindly taking away the BIO buffer in TLS (which is
not what we want since we want the entire flight in one write but is a
nice sanity check), only the SSL 3.0 no client certificate tests fail.
They too rely on some writes completing synchronously due to SSL 3.0
sending a warning alert. There is a similar bug when
tlsext_servername_callback returns SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_ALERT_WARNING.
Those will be resolved after reworking the write path since it's a bit
of a mess.
Change-Id: I56b4df6163cae1df263cf36f0d93046d0375a5ac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13052
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We repeat this in a bunch of places.
Change-Id: Iee2c95a13e1645453f101d8be4be9ac78d520387
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13051
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The write path for TLS is going to need some work. There are some fiddly
cases when there is a write in progress. Start adding tests to cover
this logic.
Later I'm hoping we can extend this flag so it drains the unfinished
write and thus test the interaction of read/write paths in 0-RTT. (We
may discover 1-RTT keys while we're in the middle of writing data.)
Change-Id: Iac2c417e4b5e84794fb699dd7cbba26a883b64ef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13049
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Channel ID is already enabled on the SSL. This dates to
49c7af1c42 which converted an instance of
tlsext_channel_id_enabled_new to it, but tlsext_channel_id_enabled_new
meant "if Channel ID is enabled, use the new one", not "enable Channel
ID".
Thanks to Eric Rescorla for catching this.
Change-Id: I2d5a82b930ffcbe5527a62a9aa5605ebb71a6b9f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13042
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than doing it right before outputing, treat this as a part of the
pipeline to finalize the certificate chain, and run it right after
cert_cb to modify the certificate configuration itself. This means
nothing else in the stack needs to worry about this case existing.
It also makes it easy to support in both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: I6a088297a54449f1f5f5bb8b5385caa4e8665eb6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12966
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
