602f4669ab
See the IETF thread here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg27292.html In particular, although the original publication of RFC 5246 had a syntax error in the field (the minimum length was unspecified), there is an errata from 2012 to fix it to be non-empty. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2864 Currently, when empty, we implicitly interpret it as SHA1/*, matching the server behavior in missing extension in ClientHellos. However that text does not support doing it for CertificateRequests, and there is not much reason to. That default (which is in itself confusing and caused problems such as older OpenSSL only signing SHA-1 given SNI) was because, at the time, there were concerns over making any ClientHello extensions mandatory. This isn't applicable for CertificateRequest, which can freely advertise their true preferences. Change-Id: I113494d8f66769fde1362795fb08ff2f471ef31d Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33524 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .github | ||
| crypto | ||
| decrepit | ||
| fipstools | ||
| fuzz | ||
| include/openssl | ||
| infra/config | ||
| ssl | ||
| third_party | ||
| tool | ||
| util | ||
| .clang-format | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| API-CONVENTIONS.md | ||
| BREAKING-CHANGES.md | ||
| BUILDING.md | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| codereview.settings | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| FUZZING.md | ||
| go.mod | ||
| INCORPORATING.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| PORTING.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| sources.cmake | ||
| STYLE.md | ||
BoringSSL
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful:
- PORTING.md: how to port OpenSSL-using code to BoringSSL.
- BUILDING.md: how to build BoringSSL
- INCORPORATING.md: how to incorporate BoringSSL into a project.
- API-CONVENTIONS.md: general API conventions for BoringSSL consumers and developers.
- STYLE.md: rules and guidelines for coding style.
- include/openssl: public headers with API documentation in comments. Also available online.
- FUZZING.md: information about fuzzing BoringSSL.
- CONTRIBUTING.md: how to contribute to BoringSSL.
- BREAKING-CHANGES.md: notes on potentially-breaking changes.