th5/handshake_client.go

763 lines
21 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package tls
import (
"bytes"
"crypto"
"crypto/ecdsa"
"crypto/rsa"
"crypto/subtle"
"crypto/x509"
"errors"
"fmt"
"io"
"net"
"strconv"
"strings"
)
type clientHandshakeState struct {
c *Conn
serverHello *serverHelloMsg
hello *clientHelloMsg
suite *cipherSuite
finishedHash finishedHash
masterSecret []byte
session *ClientSessionState
}
// c.out.Mutex <= L; c.handshakeMutex <= L.
func (c *Conn) clientHandshake() error {
if c.config == nil {
c.config = defaultConfig()
}
// This may be a renegotiation handshake, in which case some fields
// need to be reset.
c.didResume = false
if len(c.config.ServerName) == 0 && !c.config.InsecureSkipVerify {
return errors.New("tls: either ServerName or InsecureSkipVerify must be specified in the tls.Config")
}
nextProtosLength := 0
for _, proto := range c.config.NextProtos {
if l := len(proto); l == 0 || l > 255 {
return errors.New("tls: invalid NextProtos value")
} else {
nextProtosLength += 1 + l
}
}
if nextProtosLength > 0xffff {
return errors.New("tls: NextProtos values too large")
}
hello := &clientHelloMsg{
vers: c.config.maxVersion(),
compressionMethods: []uint8{compressionNone},
random: make([]byte, 32),
ocspStapling: true,
scts: true,
serverName: hostnameInSNI(c.config.ServerName),
supportedCurves: c.config.curvePreferences(),
supportedPoints: []uint8{pointFormatUncompressed},
nextProtoNeg: len(c.config.NextProtos) > 0,
secureRenegotiationSupported: true,
alpnProtocols: c.config.NextProtos,
}
if c.handshakes > 0 {
hello.secureRenegotiation = c.clientFinished[:]
}
possibleCipherSuites := c.config.cipherSuites()
hello.cipherSuites = make([]uint16, 0, len(possibleCipherSuites))
NextCipherSuite:
for _, suiteId := range possibleCipherSuites {
for _, suite := range cipherSuites {
if suite.id != suiteId {
continue
}
// Don't advertise TLS 1.2-only cipher suites unless
// we're attempting TLS 1.2.
if hello.vers < VersionTLS12 && suite.flags&suiteTLS12 != 0 {
continue
}
hello.cipherSuites = append(hello.cipherSuites, suiteId)
continue NextCipherSuite
}
}
_, err := io.ReadFull(c.config.rand(), hello.random)
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return errors.New("tls: short read from Rand: " + err.Error())
}
if hello.vers >= VersionTLS12 {
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
hello.signatureAndHashes = supportedSignatureAlgorithms
}
var session *ClientSessionState
var cacheKey string
sessionCache := c.config.ClientSessionCache
if c.config.SessionTicketsDisabled {
sessionCache = nil
}
if sessionCache != nil {
hello.ticketSupported = true
}
// Session resumption is not allowed if renegotiating because
// renegotiation is primarily used to allow a client to send a client
// certificate, which would be skipped if session resumption occured.
if sessionCache != nil && c.handshakes == 0 {
// Try to resume a previously negotiated TLS session, if
// available.
cacheKey = clientSessionCacheKey(c.conn.RemoteAddr(), c.config)
candidateSession, ok := sessionCache.Get(cacheKey)
if ok {
// Check that the ciphersuite/version used for the
// previous session are still valid.
cipherSuiteOk := false
for _, id := range hello.cipherSuites {
if id == candidateSession.cipherSuite {
cipherSuiteOk = true
break
}
}
versOk := candidateSession.vers >= c.config.minVersion() &&
candidateSession.vers <= c.config.maxVersion()
if versOk && cipherSuiteOk {
session = candidateSession
}
}
}
if session != nil {
hello.sessionTicket = session.sessionTicket
// A random session ID is used to detect when the
// server accepted the ticket and is resuming a session
// (see RFC 5077).
hello.sessionId = make([]byte, 16)
if _, err := io.ReadFull(c.config.rand(), hello.sessionId); err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return errors.New("tls: short read from Rand: " + err.Error())
}
}
if _, err := c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, hello.marshal()); err != nil {
return err
}
msg, err := c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
serverHello, ok := msg.(*serverHelloMsg)
if !ok {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return unexpectedMessageError(serverHello, msg)
}
vers, ok := c.config.mutualVersion(serverHello.vers)
if !ok || vers < VersionTLS10 {
// TLS 1.0 is the minimum version supported as a client.
c.sendAlert(alertProtocolVersion)
return fmt.Errorf("tls: server selected unsupported protocol version %x", serverHello.vers)
}
c.vers = vers
c.haveVers = true
suite := mutualCipherSuite(hello.cipherSuites, serverHello.cipherSuite)
if suite == nil {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return errors.New("tls: server chose an unconfigured cipher suite")
}
hs := &clientHandshakeState{
c: c,
serverHello: serverHello,
hello: hello,
suite: suite,
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
finishedHash: newFinishedHash(c.vers, suite),
session: session,
}
isResume, err := hs.processServerHello()
if err != nil {
return err
}
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
// No signatures of the handshake are needed in a resumption.
// Otherwise, in a full handshake, if we don't have any certificates
// configured then we will never send a CertificateVerify message and
// thus no signatures are needed in that case either.
if isResume || len(c.config.Certificates) == 0 {
hs.finishedHash.discardHandshakeBuffer()
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(hs.hello.marshal())
hs.finishedHash.Write(hs.serverHello.marshal())
c.buffering = true
if isResume {
if err := hs.establishKeys(); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := hs.readSessionTicket(); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := hs.readFinished(c.serverFinished[:]); err != nil {
return err
}
c.clientFinishedIsFirst = false
if err := hs.sendFinished(c.clientFinished[:]); err != nil {
return err
}
if _, err := c.flush(); err != nil {
return err
}
} else {
if err := hs.doFullHandshake(); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := hs.establishKeys(); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := hs.sendFinished(c.clientFinished[:]); err != nil {
return err
}
if _, err := c.flush(); err != nil {
return err
}
c.clientFinishedIsFirst = true
if err := hs.readSessionTicket(); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := hs.readFinished(c.serverFinished[:]); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if sessionCache != nil && hs.session != nil && session != hs.session {
sessionCache.Put(cacheKey, hs.session)
}
c.didResume = isResume
c.handshakeComplete = true
c.cipherSuite = suite.id
return nil
}
func (hs *clientHandshakeState) doFullHandshake() error {
c := hs.c
msg, err := c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
certMsg, ok := msg.(*certificateMsg)
if !ok || len(certMsg.certificates) == 0 {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return unexpectedMessageError(certMsg, msg)
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(certMsg.marshal())
if c.handshakes == 0 {
// If this is the first handshake on a connection, process and
// (optionally) verify the server's certificates.
certs := make([]*x509.Certificate, len(certMsg.certificates))
for i, asn1Data := range certMsg.certificates {
cert, err := x509.ParseCertificate(asn1Data)
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertBadCertificate)
return errors.New("tls: failed to parse certificate from server: " + err.Error())
}
certs[i] = cert
}
if !c.config.InsecureSkipVerify {
opts := x509.VerifyOptions{
Roots: c.config.RootCAs,
CurrentTime: c.config.time(),
DNSName: c.config.ServerName,
Intermediates: x509.NewCertPool(),
}
for i, cert := range certs {
if i == 0 {
continue
}
opts.Intermediates.AddCert(cert)
}
c.verifiedChains, err = certs[0].Verify(opts)
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertBadCertificate)
return err
}
}
switch certs[0].PublicKey.(type) {
case *rsa.PublicKey, *ecdsa.PublicKey:
break
default:
c.sendAlert(alertUnsupportedCertificate)
return fmt.Errorf("tls: server's certificate contains an unsupported type of public key: %T", certs[0].PublicKey)
}
c.peerCertificates = certs
} else {
// This is a renegotiation handshake. We require that the
// server's identity (i.e. leaf certificate) is unchanged and
// thus any previous trust decision is still valid.
//
// See https://mitls.org/pages/attacks/3SHAKE for the
// motivation behind this requirement.
if !bytes.Equal(c.peerCertificates[0].Raw, certMsg.certificates[0]) {
c.sendAlert(alertBadCertificate)
return errors.New("tls: server's identity changed during renegotiation")
}
}
if hs.serverHello.ocspStapling {
msg, err = c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
cs, ok := msg.(*certificateStatusMsg)
if !ok {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return unexpectedMessageError(cs, msg)
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(cs.marshal())
if cs.statusType == statusTypeOCSP {
c.ocspResponse = cs.response
}
}
msg, err = c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
keyAgreement := hs.suite.ka(c.vers)
skx, ok := msg.(*serverKeyExchangeMsg)
if ok {
hs.finishedHash.Write(skx.marshal())
err = keyAgreement.processServerKeyExchange(c.config, hs.hello, hs.serverHello, c.peerCertificates[0], skx)
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return err
}
msg, err = c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
}
var chainToSend *Certificate
var certRequested bool
certReq, ok := msg.(*certificateRequestMsg)
if ok {
certRequested = true
// RFC 4346 on the certificateAuthorities field:
// A list of the distinguished names of acceptable certificate
// authorities. These distinguished names may specify a desired
// distinguished name for a root CA or for a subordinate CA;
// thus, this message can be used to describe both known roots
// and a desired authorization space. If the
// certificate_authorities list is empty then the client MAY
// send any certificate of the appropriate
// ClientCertificateType, unless there is some external
// arrangement to the contrary.
hs.finishedHash.Write(certReq.marshal())
var rsaAvail, ecdsaAvail bool
for _, certType := range certReq.certificateTypes {
switch certType {
case certTypeRSASign:
rsaAvail = true
case certTypeECDSASign:
ecdsaAvail = true
}
}
// We need to search our list of client certs for one
// where SignatureAlgorithm is acceptable to the server and the
// Issuer is in certReq.certificateAuthorities
findCert:
for i, chain := range c.config.Certificates {
if !rsaAvail && !ecdsaAvail {
continue
}
for j, cert := range chain.Certificate {
x509Cert := chain.Leaf
// parse the certificate if this isn't the leaf
// node, or if chain.Leaf was nil
if j != 0 || x509Cert == nil {
if x509Cert, err = x509.ParseCertificate(cert); err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return errors.New("tls: failed to parse client certificate #" + strconv.Itoa(i) + ": " + err.Error())
}
}
switch {
case rsaAvail && x509Cert.PublicKeyAlgorithm == x509.RSA:
case ecdsaAvail && x509Cert.PublicKeyAlgorithm == x509.ECDSA:
default:
continue findCert
}
if len(certReq.certificateAuthorities) == 0 {
// they gave us an empty list, so just take the
// first cert from c.config.Certificates
chainToSend = &chain
break findCert
}
for _, ca := range certReq.certificateAuthorities {
if bytes.Equal(x509Cert.RawIssuer, ca) {
chainToSend = &chain
break findCert
}
}
}
}
msg, err = c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
}
shd, ok := msg.(*serverHelloDoneMsg)
if !ok {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return unexpectedMessageError(shd, msg)
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(shd.marshal())
// If the server requested a certificate then we have to send a
// Certificate message, even if it's empty because we don't have a
// certificate to send.
if certRequested {
certMsg = new(certificateMsg)
if chainToSend != nil {
certMsg.certificates = chainToSend.Certificate
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(certMsg.marshal())
if _, err := c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, certMsg.marshal()); err != nil {
return err
}
}
preMasterSecret, ckx, err := keyAgreement.generateClientKeyExchange(c.config, hs.hello, c.peerCertificates[0])
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return err
}
if ckx != nil {
hs.finishedHash.Write(ckx.marshal())
if _, err := c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, ckx.marshal()); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if chainToSend != nil {
certVerify := &certificateVerifyMsg{
hasSignatureAndHash: c.vers >= VersionTLS12,
}
key, ok := chainToSend.PrivateKey.(crypto.Signer)
if !ok {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return fmt.Errorf("tls: client certificate private key of type %T does not implement crypto.Signer", chainToSend.PrivateKey)
}
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
var signatureType uint8
switch key.Public().(type) {
case *ecdsa.PublicKey:
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
signatureType = signatureECDSA
case *rsa.PublicKey:
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
signatureType = signatureRSA
default:
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return fmt.Errorf("tls: failed to sign handshake with client certificate: unknown client certificate key type: %T", key)
}
certVerify.signatureAndHash, err = hs.finishedHash.selectClientCertSignatureAlgorithm(certReq.signatureAndHashes, signatureType)
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return err
}
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
digest, hashFunc, err := hs.finishedHash.hashForClientCertificate(certVerify.signatureAndHash, hs.masterSecret)
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
return err
}
certVerify.signature, err = key.Sign(c.config.rand(), digest, hashFunc)
if err != nil {
c.sendAlert(alertInternalError)
return err
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(certVerify.marshal())
if _, err := c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, certVerify.marshal()); err != nil {
return err
}
}
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
hs.masterSecret = masterFromPreMasterSecret(c.vers, hs.suite, preMasterSecret, hs.hello.random, hs.serverHello.random)
hs.finishedHash.discardHandshakeBuffer()
return nil
}
func (hs *clientHandshakeState) establishKeys() error {
c := hs.c
clientMAC, serverMAC, clientKey, serverKey, clientIV, serverIV :=
crypto/tls: decouple handshake signatures from the handshake hash. Prior to TLS 1.2, the handshake had a pleasing property that one could incrementally hash it and, from that, get the needed hashes for both the CertificateVerify and Finished messages. TLS 1.2 introduced negotiation for the signature and hash and it became possible for the handshake hash to be, say, SHA-384, but for the CertificateVerify to sign the handshake with SHA-1. The problem is that one doesn't know in advance which hashes will be needed and thus the handshake needs to be buffered. Go ignored this, always kept a single handshake hash, and any signatures over the handshake had to use that hash. However, there are a set of servers that inspect the client's offered signature hash functions and will abort the handshake if one of the server's certificates is signed with a hash function outside of that set. https://robertsspaceindustries.com/ is an example of such a server. Clearly not a lot of thought happened when that server code was written, but its out there and we have to deal with it. This change decouples the handshake hash from the CertificateVerify hash. This lays the groundwork for advertising support for SHA-384 but doesn't actually make that change in the interests of reviewability. Updating the advertised hash functions will cause changes in many of the testdata/ files and some errors might get lost in the noise. This change only needs to update four testdata/ files: one because a SHA-384-based handshake is now being signed with SHA-256 and the others because the TLS 1.2 CertificateRequest message now includes SHA-1. This change also has the effect of adding support for client-certificates in SSLv3 servers. However, SSLv3 is now disabled by default so this should be moot. It would be possible to avoid much of this change and just support SHA-384 for the ServerKeyExchange as the SKX only signs over the nonces and SKX params (a design mistake in TLS). However, that would leave Go in the odd situation where it advertised support for SHA-384, but would only use the handshake hash when signing client certificates. I fear that'll just cause problems in the future. Much of this code was written by davidben@ for the purposes of testing BoringSSL. Partly addresses #9757 Change-Id: I5137a472b6076812af387a5a69fc62c7373cd485 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/9415 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
2015-04-28 17:13:38 +01:00
keysFromMasterSecret(c.vers, hs.suite, hs.masterSecret, hs.hello.random, hs.serverHello.random, hs.suite.macLen, hs.suite.keyLen, hs.suite.ivLen)
var clientCipher, serverCipher interface{}
var clientHash, serverHash macFunction
if hs.suite.cipher != nil {
clientCipher = hs.suite.cipher(clientKey, clientIV, false /* not for reading */)
clientHash = hs.suite.mac(c.vers, clientMAC)
serverCipher = hs.suite.cipher(serverKey, serverIV, true /* for reading */)
serverHash = hs.suite.mac(c.vers, serverMAC)
} else {
clientCipher = hs.suite.aead(clientKey, clientIV)
serverCipher = hs.suite.aead(serverKey, serverIV)
}
c.in.prepareCipherSpec(c.vers, serverCipher, serverHash)
c.out.prepareCipherSpec(c.vers, clientCipher, clientHash)
return nil
}
func (hs *clientHandshakeState) serverResumedSession() bool {
// If the server responded with the same sessionId then it means the
// sessionTicket is being used to resume a TLS session.
return hs.session != nil && hs.hello.sessionId != nil &&
bytes.Equal(hs.serverHello.sessionId, hs.hello.sessionId)
}
func (hs *clientHandshakeState) processServerHello() (bool, error) {
c := hs.c
if hs.serverHello.compressionMethod != compressionNone {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return false, errors.New("tls: server selected unsupported compression format")
}
if c.handshakes == 0 && hs.serverHello.secureRenegotiationSupported {
c.secureRenegotiation = true
if len(hs.serverHello.secureRenegotiation) != 0 {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return false, errors.New("tls: initial handshake had non-empty renegotiation extension")
}
}
if c.handshakes > 0 && c.secureRenegotiation {
var expectedSecureRenegotiation [24]byte
copy(expectedSecureRenegotiation[:], c.clientFinished[:])
copy(expectedSecureRenegotiation[12:], c.serverFinished[:])
if !bytes.Equal(hs.serverHello.secureRenegotiation, expectedSecureRenegotiation[:]) {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return false, errors.New("tls: incorrect renegotiation extension contents")
}
}
clientDidNPN := hs.hello.nextProtoNeg
clientDidALPN := len(hs.hello.alpnProtocols) > 0
serverHasNPN := hs.serverHello.nextProtoNeg
serverHasALPN := len(hs.serverHello.alpnProtocol) > 0
if !clientDidNPN && serverHasNPN {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return false, errors.New("tls: server advertised unrequested NPN extension")
}
if !clientDidALPN && serverHasALPN {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return false, errors.New("tls: server advertised unrequested ALPN extension")
}
if serverHasNPN && serverHasALPN {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return false, errors.New("tls: server advertised both NPN and ALPN extensions")
}
if serverHasALPN {
c.clientProtocol = hs.serverHello.alpnProtocol
c.clientProtocolFallback = false
}
c.scts = hs.serverHello.scts
if !hs.serverResumedSession() {
return false, nil
}
if hs.session.vers != c.vers {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return false, errors.New("tls: server resumed a session with a different version")
}
if hs.session.cipherSuite != hs.suite.id {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return false, errors.New("tls: server resumed a session with a different cipher suite")
}
// Restore masterSecret and peerCerts from previous state
hs.masterSecret = hs.session.masterSecret
c.peerCertificates = hs.session.serverCertificates
c.verifiedChains = hs.session.verifiedChains
return true, nil
}
func (hs *clientHandshakeState) readFinished(out []byte) error {
c := hs.c
c.readRecord(recordTypeChangeCipherSpec)
if c.in.err != nil {
return c.in.err
}
msg, err := c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
serverFinished, ok := msg.(*finishedMsg)
if !ok {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return unexpectedMessageError(serverFinished, msg)
}
verify := hs.finishedHash.serverSum(hs.masterSecret)
if len(verify) != len(serverFinished.verifyData) ||
subtle.ConstantTimeCompare(verify, serverFinished.verifyData) != 1 {
c.sendAlert(alertHandshakeFailure)
return errors.New("tls: server's Finished message was incorrect")
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(serverFinished.marshal())
copy(out, verify)
return nil
}
func (hs *clientHandshakeState) readSessionTicket() error {
if !hs.serverHello.ticketSupported {
return nil
}
c := hs.c
msg, err := c.readHandshake()
if err != nil {
return err
}
sessionTicketMsg, ok := msg.(*newSessionTicketMsg)
if !ok {
c.sendAlert(alertUnexpectedMessage)
return unexpectedMessageError(sessionTicketMsg, msg)
}
hs.finishedHash.Write(sessionTicketMsg.marshal())
hs.session = &ClientSessionState{
sessionTicket: sessionTicketMsg.ticket,
vers: c.vers,
cipherSuite: hs.suite.id,
masterSecret: hs.masterSecret,
serverCertificates: c.peerCertificates,
verifiedChains: c.verifiedChains,
}
return nil
}
func (hs *clientHandshakeState) sendFinished(out []byte) error {
c := hs.c
if _, err := c.writeRecord(recordTypeChangeCipherSpec, []byte{1}); err != nil {
return err
}
if hs.serverHello.nextProtoNeg {
nextProto := new(nextProtoMsg)
proto, fallback := mutualProtocol(c.config.NextProtos, hs.serverHello.nextProtos)
nextProto.proto = proto
c.clientProtocol = proto
c.clientProtocolFallback = fallback
hs.finishedHash.Write(nextProto.marshal())
if _, err := c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, nextProto.marshal()); err != nil {
return err
}
}
finished := new(finishedMsg)
finished.verifyData = hs.finishedHash.clientSum(hs.masterSecret)
hs.finishedHash.Write(finished.marshal())
if _, err := c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, finished.marshal()); err != nil {
return err
}
copy(out, finished.verifyData)
return nil
}
// clientSessionCacheKey returns a key used to cache sessionTickets that could
// be used to resume previously negotiated TLS sessions with a server.
func clientSessionCacheKey(serverAddr net.Addr, config *Config) string {
if len(config.ServerName) > 0 {
return config.ServerName
}
return serverAddr.String()
}
// mutualProtocol finds the mutual Next Protocol Negotiation or ALPN protocol
// given list of possible protocols and a list of the preference order. The
// first list must not be empty. It returns the resulting protocol and flag
// indicating if the fallback case was reached.
func mutualProtocol(protos, preferenceProtos []string) (string, bool) {
for _, s := range preferenceProtos {
for _, c := range protos {
if s == c {
return s, false
}
}
}
return protos[0], true
}
// hostnameInSNI converts name into an approriate hostname for SNI.
// Literal IP addresses and absolute FQDNs are not permitted as SNI values.
// See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066#section-3.
func hostnameInSNI(name string) string {
host := name
if len(host) > 0 && host[0] == '[' && host[len(host)-1] == ']' {
host = host[1 : len(host)-1]
}
if i := strings.LastIndex(host, "%"); i > 0 {
host = host[:i]
}
if net.ParseIP(host) != nil {
return ""
}
if len(name) > 0 && name[len(name)-1] == '.' {
name = name[:len(name)-1]
}
return name
}