Reject stray post-Finished messages in DTLS.
This is in preparation for switching finish_handshake to a release_current_message hook. finish_handshake in DTLS is also responsible for releasing any memory associated with extra messages in the handshake. Except that's not right and we need to make it an error anyway. Given that the rest of the DTLS dispatch layer already strongly assumes there is only one message in epoch one, putting the check in the fragment processing works fine enough. Add tests for this. This will certainly need revising when DTLS 1.3 happens (perhaps just a version check, perhaps bringing finish_handshake back as a function that can fail... which means we need a state just before SSL_ST_OK), but DTLS 1.3 post-handshake messages haven't really been written down, so let's do the easy thing for now and add a test for when it gets more interesting. This removes the sequence number reset in the DTLS code. That reset never did anything becase we don't and never will renego. We should make sure DTLS 1.3 does not bring the reset back for post-handshake stuff. (It was wrong in 1.2 too. Penultimate-flight retransmits and renego requests are ambiguous in DTLS.) BUG=83 Change-Id: I33d645a8550f73e74606030b9815fdac0c9fb682 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8988 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9fd9580137
commit
02edcd0098
@ -368,6 +368,13 @@ start:
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The encrypted epoch in DTLS has only one handshake message. */
|
||||
if (ssl->d1->r_epoch == 1 && msg_hdr.seq != ssl->d1->handshake_read_seq) {
|
||||
OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(SSL, SSL_R_UNEXPECTED_RECORD);
|
||||
ssl3_send_alert(ssl, SSL3_AL_FATAL, SSL_AD_UNEXPECTED_MESSAGE);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (msg_hdr.seq < ssl->d1->handshake_read_seq ||
|
||||
msg_hdr.seq >
|
||||
(unsigned)ssl->d1->handshake_read_seq + SSL_MAX_HANDSHAKE_FLIGHT) {
|
||||
|
@ -223,7 +223,8 @@ again:
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (msg_hdr.type == SSL3_MT_FINISHED) {
|
||||
if (msg_hdr.type == SSL3_MT_FINISHED &&
|
||||
msg_hdr.seq == ssl->d1->handshake_read_seq) {
|
||||
if (msg_hdr.frag_off == 0) {
|
||||
/* Retransmit our last flight of messages. If the peer sends the second
|
||||
* Finished, they may not have received ours. Only do this for the
|
||||
|
@ -93,8 +93,6 @@ static uint16_t dtls1_version_to_wire(uint16_t version) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void dtls1_finish_handshake(SSL *ssl) {
|
||||
ssl->d1->handshake_read_seq = 0;
|
||||
ssl->d1->handshake_write_seq = 0;
|
||||
dtls_clear_incoming_messages(ssl);
|
||||
ssl->init_msg = NULL;
|
||||
ssl->init_num = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -1009,6 +1009,10 @@ type ProtocolBugs struct {
|
||||
// PackHelloRequestWithFinished, if true, causes the TLS server to send
|
||||
// HelloRequest in the same record as Finished.
|
||||
PackHelloRequestWithFinished bool
|
||||
|
||||
// SendExtraFinished, if true, causes an extra Finished message to be
|
||||
// sent.
|
||||
SendExtraFinished bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (c *Config) serverInit() {
|
||||
|
@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ NextCipherSuite:
|
||||
// leg of the handshake is retransmited upon re-receiving a
|
||||
// Finished.
|
||||
if err := c.simulatePacketLoss(func() {
|
||||
c.sendHandshakeSeq--
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, hs.finishedBytes)
|
||||
c.flushHandshake()
|
||||
}); err != nil {
|
||||
@ -764,6 +765,9 @@ func (hs *clientHandshakeState) doTLS13Handshake() error {
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, finished.marshal())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if c.config.Bugs.SendExtraFinished {
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, finished.marshal())
|
||||
}
|
||||
c.flushHandshake()
|
||||
|
||||
// Switch to application data keys.
|
||||
@ -1345,6 +1349,11 @@ func (hs *clientHandshakeState) sendFinished(out []byte, isResume bool) error {
|
||||
for _, msg := range postCCSMsgs {
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, msg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if c.config.Bugs.SendExtraFinished {
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, finished.marshal())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
c.flushHandshake()
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
|
@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ func (c *Conn) serverHandshake() error {
|
||||
// leg of the handshake is retransmited upon re-receiving a
|
||||
// Finished.
|
||||
if err := c.simulatePacketLoss(func() {
|
||||
c.sendHandshakeSeq--
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, hs.finishedBytes)
|
||||
c.flushHandshake()
|
||||
}); err != nil {
|
||||
@ -582,6 +583,9 @@ Curves:
|
||||
}
|
||||
hs.writeServerHash(finished.marshal())
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, finished.marshal())
|
||||
if c.config.Bugs.SendExtraFinished {
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, finished.marshal())
|
||||
}
|
||||
c.flushHandshake()
|
||||
|
||||
// The various secrets do not incorporate the client's final leg, so
|
||||
@ -1399,6 +1403,10 @@ func (hs *serverHandshakeState) sendFinished(out []byte) error {
|
||||
|
||||
if !c.config.Bugs.SkipFinished && len(postCCSBytes) > 0 {
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, postCCSBytes)
|
||||
if c.config.Bugs.SendExtraFinished {
|
||||
c.writeRecord(recordTypeHandshake, finished.marshal())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !c.config.Bugs.PackHelloRequestWithFinished {
|
||||
// Defer flushing until renegotiation.
|
||||
c.flushHandshake()
|
||||
|
@ -2086,6 +2086,30 @@ func addBasicTests() {
|
||||
},
|
||||
resumeSession: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
protocol: dtls,
|
||||
name: "DTLS-SendExtraFinished",
|
||||
config: Config{
|
||||
Bugs: ProtocolBugs{
|
||||
SendExtraFinished: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
shouldFail: true,
|
||||
expectedError: ":UNEXPECTED_RECORD:",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
protocol: dtls,
|
||||
name: "DTLS-SendExtraFinished-Reordered",
|
||||
config: Config{
|
||||
Bugs: ProtocolBugs{
|
||||
MaxHandshakeRecordLength: 2,
|
||||
ReorderHandshakeFragments: true,
|
||||
SendExtraFinished: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
shouldFail: true,
|
||||
expectedError: ":UNEXPECTED_RECORD:",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
testCases = append(testCases, basicTests...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user