The names in the P-224 code collided with the P-256 code and thus many
of the functions and constants in the P-224 code have been prefixed.
Change-Id: I6bcd304640c539d0483d129d5eaf1702894929a8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15847
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These modes do internal random IV generation and are unsuitable for
non-testing purposes.
Change-Id: I14b98af8f6cf43b4fc835a2b04a9b0425b7651b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15244
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Support for platforms that we don't support FIPS on doesn't need to be
in the module. Also, functions for dealing with whether fork-unsafe
buffering is enabled are left out because they aren't implementing any
cryptography and they use global r/w state, making their inclusion
painful.
Change-Id: I71a0123db6f5449e9dfc7ec7dea0944428e661aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15084
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The changes to delocate.go are needed because modes/ does things like
return the address of a module function. Both of these need to be
changed from referencing the GOT to using local symbols.
Rather than testing whether |ghash| is |gcm_ghash_avx|, we can just keep
that information in a flag.
The test for |aesni_ctr32_encrypt_blocks| is more problematic, but I
believe that it's superfluous and can be dropped: if you passed in a
stream function that was semantically different from
|aesni_ctr32_encrypt_blocks| you would already have a bug because
|CRYPTO_gcm128_[en|de]crypt_ctr32| will handle a block at the end
themselves, and assume a big-endian, 32-bit counter anyway.
Change-Id: I68a84ebdab6c6006e11e9467e3362d7585461385
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15064
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A follow-up change will add a CRYPTO_BUFFER variant. This makes the
naming match the header and doesn't require including x509.h. (Though
like ssl.h and pkcs8.h, some of the functions are implemented with code
that depends on crypto/x509.)
Change-Id: I5a7de209f4f775fe0027893f711326d89699ca1f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15128
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This also fixes TestGetUint to actually test CBS_get_last_u8's behavior.
Right now it can't distinguish CBS_get_last_u8 and CBS_get_u8.
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ie431bb1a828f1c6877938ba7e75c82305b54cf13
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15007
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: If91d97ea653177d55d5c703f091366ddce24da60
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15006
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This isn't actually used yet, but implements CTR-DRBG from SP 800-90Ar1.
Specifically, it always uses AES-256 and no derivation function.
Change-Id: Ie82b829590226addd7c165eac410a5d584858bfd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14891
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This ends up under half the size of the original file.
BUG=129
Change-Id: Idec69d9517bd57cee6b3b83bc0cce05396565b70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14305
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This also adds a few missing assertions (X25519 returns true in normal
cases and, even when it returns zero, it still writes to out.)
BUG=129
Change-Id: I63f7e9025f88b2ec309382b66fc915acca6513a9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14030
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ie64a445a42fb3a6d16818b1fabba8481e6e9ad94
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14029
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: Id7a92285601ff4276f4015eaee290bf77aa22b47
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13628
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: I603054193a20c2bcc3ac1724f9b29d6384d9f62a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13626
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ibbd6d0804a75cb17ff33f64d4cdf9ae80b26e9df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13867
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: I227ffa2da4e220075de296fb5b94d043f4e032e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13627
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
For now, this is the laziest conversion possible. The intent is to just
get the build setup ready so that we can get everything working in our
consumers. The intended end state is:
- The standalone build produces three test targets, one per library:
{crypto,ssl,decrepit}_tests.
- Each FOO_test is made up of:
FOO/**/*_test.cc
crypto/test/gtest_main.cc
test_support
- generate_build_files.py emits variables crypto_test_sources and
ssl_test_sources. These variables are populated with FindCFiles,
looking for *_test.cc.
- The consuming file assembles those variables into the two test targets
(plus decrepit) from there. This avoids having generate_build_files.py
emit actual build rules.
- Our standalone builders, Chromium, and Android just run the top-level
test targets using whatever GTest-based reporting story they have.
In transition, we start by converting one of two tests in each library
to populate the three test targets. Those are added to all_tests.json
and all_tests.go hacked to handle them transparently. This keeps our
standalone builder working.
generate_build_files.py, to start with, populates the new source lists
manually and subtracts them out of the old machinery. We emit both for
the time being. When this change rolls in, we'll write all the build
glue needed to build the GTest-based tests and add it to consumers'
continuous builders.
Next, we'll subsume a file-based test and get the consumers working with
that. (I.e. make sure the GTest targets can depend on a data file.)
Once that's all done, we'll be sure all this will work. At that point,
we start subsuming the remaining tests into the GTest targets and,
asynchronously, rewriting tests to use GTest properly rather than
cursory conversion here.
When all non-GTest tests are gone, the old generate_build_files.py hooks
will be removed, consumers updated to not depend on them, and standalone
builders converted to not rely on all_tests.go, which can then be
removed. (Unless bits end up being needed as a malloc test driver. I'm
thinking we'll want to do something with --gtest_filter.)
As part of this CL, I've bumped the CMake requirements (for
target_include_directories) and added a few suppressions for warnings
that GTest doesn't pass.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I881b26b07a8739cc0b52dbb51a30956908e1b71a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13232
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
BUG=chromium:682816
Change-Id: I2345d6db83441691fe0c1ab6d7c6da4d24777849
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13203
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commit def9b46801.
(I should have uploaded a new version before sending to the commit queue.)
Change-Id: Iaead89c8d7fc1f56e6294d869db9238b467f520a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13202
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
Change-Id: Icd9c2117c657f3aa6df55990c618d562194ef0e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13201
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Iaac633616a54ba1ed04c14e4778865c169a68621
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12703
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
AES-GCM-SIV is an AEAD with nonce-misuse resistance. It can reuse
hardware support for AES-GCM and thus encrypt at ~66% the speed, and
decrypt at 100% the speed, of AES-GCM.
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-02
This implementation is generic, not optimised, and reuses existing AES
and GHASH support as much as possible. It is guarded by !OPENSSL_SMALL,
at least for now.
Change-Id: Ia9f77b256ef5dfb8588bb9ecfe6ee0e827626f57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12541
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
For the most part, this is with random test data which isn't
particularly good. But we'll be able to add more interesting test
vectors as they come up.
Change-Id: I9c50db7ac2c4bf978d4901000ab32e3642aea82b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12222
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These structures allow for blobs of data (e.g. certificates) to be
deduplicated in memory.
Change-Id: Iebfec90b85d55565848a178b6951562b4ccc083e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11820
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This finally removes the last Android hack. Both Chromium and Android
end up needing this thing (Chromium needs it for WebCrypto but currently
uses the EVP_AEAD version and Android needs it by way of
wpa_supplicant).
On the Android side, the alternative is we finish upstream's
NEED_INTERNAL_AES_WRAP patch, but then it just uses its own key-wrap
implementation. This seems a little silly, considering we have a version
of key-wrap under a different API anyway.
It also doesn't make much sense to leave the EVP_AEAD API around if we
don't want people to use it and Chromium's the only consumer. Remove it
and I'll switch Chromium to the new---er, old--- APIs next roll.
Change-Id: I23a89cda25bddb6ac1033e4cd408165f393d1e6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11410
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This withdraws support for -DBORINGSSL_ENABLE_RC4_TLS, and removes the
RC4 AEADs.
Change-Id: I1321b76bfe047d180743fa46d1b81c5d70c64e81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10940
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These test vectors include the k value, so we can get a deterministic
test.
Change-Id: Ie3cb61a99203cd55b01f4835be7c32043309748d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10701
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This and the following commits will import NIST's ECC test vectors.
Right now all our tests pass if I make P-224 act like P-521, which is
kind of embarrassing. (Other curves are actually tested, but only
because runner.go tests them against BoGo.)
Change-Id: Id0b20451ebd5f10f1d09765a810ad140bea28fa0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10700
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Test vectors taken from one run of bc_test with the -bc flag, along with
a handful of manual test vectors around numbers close to zero. (The
output was compared against bc to make sure it was correct.)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I9e9263ece64a877c8497716cd4713b4c3e44248c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8521
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some files were named 𝑥_test.txt and some 𝑥_tests.txt. This change
unifies around the latter.
Change-Id: Id6f29bad8b998f3c3466655097ef593f7f18f82f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8150
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
One of these tests the distribution of noise polynomials; the other
tests that that agreed-upon keys (prior to whitening) have roughly equal
numbers of 0s and 1s.
Along the way, expose a few more API bits.
Change-Id: I6b04708d41590de45d82ea95bae1033cfccd5d67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8130
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The test vectors are taken from the reference implementation, modified
to output the results of its random-number generator, and the results of
key generation prior to SHA3. This allows the interoperability of the
two implementations to be tested somewhat.
To accomplish the testing, this commit creates a new, lower-level API
that leaves the generation of random numbers and all wire encoding and
decoding up to the caller.
Change-Id: Ifae3517696dde4be4a0b7c1998bdefb789bac599
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's not possible to encode an OID with only one component, so some of
the NIDs do not have encodings. The logic to actually encode OIDs checks
for this (before calling der_it), but not the logic to compute the
sorted OID list.
Without this, OBJ_obj2nid, when given an empty OID, returns something
arbitrary based on the binary search implementation instead of
NID_undef.
Change-Id: Ib68bae349f66eff3d193616eb26491b6668d4b0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7752
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I9c5e66c34d0f1b735c69d033daee5d312e3c2fe7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7410
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The coverage tool revealed that we weren't testing all codepaths of the ChaCha
assembly. Add a standalone test as it's much easier to iterate over all lengths
when there isn't the entire AEAD in the way.
I wasn't able to find a really long test vector, so I generated a random one
with the Go implementation we have in runner.
This test gives us full coverage on the ChaCha20_ssse3 variant. (We'll see how
it fares on the other codepaths when the multi-variant test harnesses get in. I
certainly hope there isn't a more novel way to call ChaCha20 than this...)
Change-Id: I087e421c7351f46ea65dacdc7127e4fbf5f4c0aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7299
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
