The comment in |BN_mod_inverse_ex| makes it clear that |BN_BITS2| was
intended. Besides fixing the code to match the comment, remove
the now-unused |BN_BITS| and the already-unused |BN_MASK| to prevent
future confusion of this sort.
On MSVC builds there seems to be very little difference in performance
between the two code paths according to |bssl speed|.
Change-Id: I765b7b3d464e2057b1d7952af25b6deb2724976a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6525
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, both crypto/dh and crypto/ec defined |TOBN| macros that did
the same thing, but which took their arguments in the opposite order.
This change makes the code consistently use the same macro. It also
makes |STATIC_BIGNUM| available for internal use outside of crypto/bn.
Change-Id: Ide57f6a5b74ea95b3585724c7e1a630c82a864d9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6528
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
clang-format packing them tightly made newlines inconsistent which
wasn't very helpful.
Change-Id: I46a787862ed1f5b0eee101394e24c779b6bc652b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6517
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Trim the cipher table further. Those values are entirely determined by
algorithm_enc.
Change-Id: I355c245b0663e41e54e62d15903a4a9a667b4ffe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6516
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
FIPS is the same as HIGH (but for CHACHA20), so those are redundant.
Likewise, MEDIUM vs HIGH was just RC4. Remove those in favor of
redefining those legacy rules to mean this.
One less field to keep track of in each cipher.
Change-Id: I2b2489cffb9e16efb0ac7d7290c173cac061432a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6515
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's redundant with other cipher properties. We can express these in code.
Cipher rule matching gets a little bit complicated due to the confusing legacy
protocol version cipher rules, so add some tests for it. (It's really hard to
grep for uses of them, so I've kept them working to be safe.)
Change-Id: Ic6b3fcd55d76d4a51b31bf7ae629a2da50a7450e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6453
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The keylog BIO is internally synchronized by the SSL_CTX lock, but an
application may wish to log keys from multiple SSL_CTXs. This is in
preparation for switching Chromium to use a separate SSL_CTX per profile
to more naturally split up the session caches.
It will also be useful for routing up SSLKEYLOGFILE in WebRTC. There,
each log line must be converted to an IPC up from the renderer
processes.
This will require changes in Chromium when we roll BoringSSL.
BUG=458365,webrtc:4417
Change-Id: I2945bdb4def0a9c36e751eab3d5b06c330d66b54
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6514
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This ensures the run_tests target updates those binaries.
Change-Id: I32b68026da4852424b5621e014e71037c8a5754c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6513
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Without |EC_POINTs_mul|, there's never more than one variable point
passed to a |EC_METHOD|'s |mul| method. This allows them to be
simplified considerably. In this commit, the p256-x86_64 implementation
has been simplified to eliminate the heap allocation and looping
related that was previously necessary to deal with the possibility of
there being multiple input points. The other implementations were left
mostly as-is; they should be similarly simplified in the future.
Change-Id: I70751d1d5296be2562af0730e7ccefdba7a1acae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6493
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This makes similar fixes as were done in the following OpenSSL commits:
c028254b12a8ea0d0f8a677172eda2e2d78073f3: Correctly set Z_is_one on
the return value in the NISTZ256 implementation.
e22d2199e2a5cc9b243f45c2b633d1e31fadecd7: Error checking and memory
leak leak fixes in NISTZ256.
4446044a793a9103a4bc70c0214005e6a4463767: NISTZ256: set Z_is_one to
boolean 0/1 as is customary.
a4d5269e6d0dba0c276c968448a3576f7604666a: NISTZ256: don't swallow
malloc errors.
The fixes aren't exactly the same. In particular, the comments "This is
an unusual input, we don't guarantee constant-timeness" and the changes
to |ecp_nistz256_mult_precompute| (which isn't in BoringSSL) were
omitted.
Change-Id: Ia7bb982daa62fb328e8bd2d4dd49a8857e104096
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6492
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This moves us closer to having |EC_GROUP| and |EC_KEY| being immutable.
The functions are left as no-ops for backward compatibility.
Change-Id: Ie23921ab0364f0771c03aede37b064804c9f69e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6485
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This extends 9f1f04f313 to the other
implementations.
|EC_GFp_nistp224_method| and |EC_GFp_nistp256_method| are not marked
|OPENSSL_EXPORT|. |EC_GROUP_set_generator| doesn't allow the generator
to be changed for any |EC_GROUP| for built-in curves. Consequently,
there's no way (except some kind of terrible abuse) that this code
could be executed with a non-default generator.
Change-Id: I5d9b6be4e6f9d384159cb3d708390a8e3c69f23f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6489
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Nexus 7 goes from 1002.8 ops/sec to 4704.8 at a cost of 10KB of code.
(It'll actually save code if built with -mfpu=neon because then the
generic version can be discarded by the compiler.)
Change-Id: Ia6d02efb2c2d1bb02a07eb56ec4ca3b0dba99382
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6524
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If -mfpu=neon is passed then we don't need to worry about checking for
NEON support at run time. This change allows |CRYPTO_is_NEON_capable| to
statically return 1 in this case. This then allows the compiler to
discard generic code in several cases.
Change-Id: I3b229740ea3d5cb0a304f365c400a0996d0c66ef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6523
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
MSVC doesn't like unary minus on unsigned types. Also, the speed test
always failed because the inputs were all zeros and thus had small
order.
Change-Id: Ic2d3c2c9bd57dc66295d93891396871cebac1e0b
It can fail on FreeBSD when library is not linked against either
threading library and results in init routine not being executed
at all, leading to errors in other parts of the code.
Change-Id: I1063f6940e381e6470593c063fbfecf3f47991cd
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6522
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Relevant code was removed in 5d5e39f5d2.
Change-Id: I198844064030c04f88e5541f2bbaa29ae13d14bb
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6521
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I3072f884be77b8646e90d316154b96448f0cf2a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6520
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
So long as we're not getting rid of them (the certificate variants may
be useful when we decouple from crypto/x509 anyway), get the types and
bounds checks right.
Also reject trailing data and require the input be a single element.
Note: this is a slight compatibility risk, but we did it for
SSL*_use_RSAPrivateKey_ASN1 previously and I think it's probably worth
seeing if anything breaks here.
Change-Id: I64fa3fc6249021ccf59584d68e56ff424a190082
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6490
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This codepath should not actually be reachable, unless maybe the caller is
doing something really dumb. (Unconfiguring the key partway through the
connection.)
Change-Id: Ic8e0cfc3c426439016370f9a85be9c05509358f1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6483
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
TLS resets it in t1_enc.c while DTLS has it sprinkled everywhere.
Change-Id: I78f0f0e646b4dc82a1058199c4b00f2e917aa5bc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6511
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
stdint.h already has macros for this. The spec says that, in C++,
__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS is needed, so define it for bytestring_test.cc.
Chromium seems to use these macros without trouble, so I'm assuming we
can rely on them.
Change-Id: I56d178689b44d22c6379911bbb93d3b01dd832a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6510
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Until we've done away with the d2i_* stack completely, boundaries need
to be mindful of the type mismatch. d2i_* takes a long, not a size_t.
Change-Id: If02f9ca2cfde02d0929ac18275d09bf5df400f3a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6491
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Triggered by RT#3989.
(Imported from upstream's fbab8baddef8d3346ae40ff068871e2ddaf10270. This
doesn't seem to affect us, but avoid getting out of sync.)
Change-Id: I164e2a72e4b75e286ceaa03745ed9bcbf6c3e32e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6512
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
To no great surprise, ASAN didn't like this test and I suspect that
Chromium, with its crashing allocator, won't like it either. Oh well.
Change-Id: I235dbb965dbba186f8f37d7df45f8eac9addc7eb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6496
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
People expect to do:
CBB foo;
if (!CBB_init(&foo, 100) ||
…
…) {
CBB_cleanup(&foo);
return 0;
}
However, currently, if the allocation of |initial_capacity| fails in
|CBB_init| then |CBB_cleanup| will operate on uninitialised values. This
change makes the above pattern safe.
Change-Id: I3e002fda8f0a3ac18650b504e7e84a842d4165ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6495
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OpenSSH calls |RAND_seed| before jailing in the expectation that that
will be sufficient to ensure that later RAND calls are successful.
See internal bug 25695426.
Change-Id: I9d3f5665249af6610328ac767cb83059bb2953dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6494
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
|EC_POINT_point2oct| would encode ∞, which is surprising, and
|EC_POINT_oct2point| would decode ∞, which is insane. This change
removes both behaviours.
Thanks to Brian Smith for pointing it out.
Change-Id: Ia89f257dc429a69b9ea7b7b15f75454ccc9c3bdd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6488
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In the case of a compressed point, the decompression ensures that the
point is on the curve. In the uncompressed case,
|EC_POINT_set_affine_coordinates_GFp| checks that the point is on the
curve as of 38feb990a1.
Change-Id: Icd69809ae396838b4aef4fa89b3b354560afed55
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6487
Reviewed-by: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's a few things that will be kind of a nuisance and possibly not worth it
(crypto/asn1 dumps a lot of undeclared things, etc.). But it caught some
mistakes. Even without the warning, making sure to include the externs before
defining a function helps catch type mismatches.
Change-Id: I3dab282aaba6023e7cebc94ed7a767a5d7446b08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6484
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
|EC_GFp_nistz256_method| is not marked |OPENSSL_EXPORT| so only the
built-in P-256 curve uses it. |EC_GROUP_set_generator| doesn't allow
the generator to be changed for any |EC_GROUP| for a built-in curve.
Consequently, there's no way (except some kind of terrible abuse) that
the nistz code could be executed with a non-default generator.
Change-Id: Ib22f00bc74c103b7869ed1e35032b1f3d26cdad2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6446
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Found with -Wtype-limits.
Change-Id: I5580f179425bc6b09ff2a8559fce121b0cc8ae14
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6463
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Found with -Wtype-limits.
Change-Id: I41cdbb7e6564b715dfe445877a89594371fdeef0
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6462
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium's toolchains may now assume C++11 library support, so we may freely
use C++11 features. (Chromium's still in the process of deciding what to allow,
but we use Google's style guide directly, toolchain limitations aside.)
Change-Id: I1c7feb92b7f5f51d9091a4c686649fb574ac138d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6465
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
dh.c had a 10k-bit limit but it wasn't quite correctly enforced. However,
that's still 1.12s of jank on the IO thread, which is too long. Since the SSL
code consumes DHE groups from the network, it should be responsible for
enforcing what sanity it needs on them.
Costs of various bit lengths on 2013 Macbook Air:
1024 - 1.4ms
2048 - 14ms
3072 - 24ms
4096 - 55ms
5000 - 160ms
10000 - 1.12s
UMA says that DHE groups are 0.2% 4096-bit and otherwise are 5.5% 2048-bit and
94% 1024-bit and some noise. Set the limit to 4096-bit to be conservative,
although that's already quite a lot of jank.
BUG=554295
Change-Id: I8e167748a67e4e1adfb62d73dfff094abfa7d215
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6464
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The current check has two problems:
- It only runs on the server, where there isn't a curve list at all. This was a
mistake in https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1843 which flipped it
from client-only to server-only.
- It only runs in TLS 1.2, so one could bypass it by just negotiating TLS 1.1.
Upstream added it as part of their Suite B mode, which requires 1.2.
Move it elsewhere. Though we do not check the entire chain, leaving that to the
certificate verifier, signatures made by the leaf certificate are made by the
SSL/TLS stack, so it's reasonable to check the curve as part of checking
suitability of a leaf.
Change-Id: I7c12f2a32ba946a20e9ba6c70eff23bebcb60bb2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6414
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's easier to put libFuzzer.a into the source directory than to install
it globally.
Change-Id: I4dc7b56f81c7aa0371475c68d23368b025186505
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6461
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The file armv8-mont.pl is taken from upstream. The speed ups are fairly
modest (~30%) but seem worthwhile.
Before:
Did 231 RSA 2048 signing operations in 1008671us (229.0 ops/sec)
Did 11208 RSA 2048 verify operations in 1036997us (10808.1 ops/sec)
Did 342 RSA 2048 (3 prime, e=3) signing operations in 1021545us (334.8 ops/sec)
Did 32000 RSA 2048 (3 prime, e=3) verify operations in 1016162us (31491.0 ops/sec)
Did 45 RSA 4096 signing operations in 1039805us (43.3 ops/sec)
Did 3608 RSA 4096 verify operations in 1060283us (3402.9 ops/sec)
After:
Did 300 RSA 2048 signing operations in 1009772us (297.1 ops/sec)
Did 12740 RSA 2048 verify operations in 1075413us (11846.6 ops/sec)
Did 408 RSA 2048 (3 prime, e=3) signing operations in 1016139us (401.5 ops/sec)
Did 33000 RSA 2048 (3 prime, e=3) verify operations in 1017510us (32432.1 ops/sec)
Did 52 RSA 4096 signing operations in 1067678us (48.7 ops/sec)
Did 3408 RSA 4096 verify operations in 1062863us (3206.4 ops/sec)
Change-Id: Ife74fac784067fce3668b5c87f51d481732ff855
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6444
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 52e028b9de371da62c1e51b46592517b1068d770.)
Change-Id: If980d774671b9b5ba997db3fd7d4043525a85609
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6445
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
PKCS#12 files may not necessarily include keys.
Change-Id: Ibb43b609783b02aa9cbb192fea377081169666ff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6456
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There seems to have been a merge error.
Change-Id: I72e5c2a45c148e31c90b28bedfff48f8ca6e3c8c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6455
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This exposes the ServerKeyExchange signature hash type used in the most recent
handshake, for histogramming on the client.
BUG=549662
Change-Id: I8a4e00ac735b1ecd2c2df824112c3a0bc62332a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6413
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
