It's not part of SSL_OP_ALL and is unused, so remove it. Add a test that
asserts the version check works.
Change-Id: I917516594ec5a4998a8316782f035697c33d99b0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1418
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(This change originally applied to 1.0.1. In the switch to 1.0.2, the
DTLS specific client processing was removed and now the s3_clnt.c
functions are used. This caused most of the patch to be moot. What
remains is still useful however. For the original patch, see the change
against 1.0.1: 88ae012c8092852f03c50f6461175271104b4c8a)
CVE-2014-3510
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 1d7d0ed9c21403d79d602b6c7d76fdecf5e737da)
Change-Id: I666f9c48d603f2366cab821ae446a57360c3026b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1439
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CVE-2014-3509
(Imported from upstream's 92aa73bcbfad44f9dd7997ae51537ac5d7dc201e)
Change-Id: Ibc681897251081ae5ebfea0ff6ca9defd73fe0f5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1441
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
- Upon parsing, reject OIDs with invalid base-128 encoding.
- Always NUL-terminate the destination buffer in OBJ_obj2txt printing
function.
CVE-2014-3508
(Imported from upstream's c01618dd822cc724c05eeb52455874ad068ec6a5)
Change-Id: I12bdeeaa700183195e4c2f474f964f8ae7a04549
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1440
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In a couple of functions, a sequence number would be calculated twice.
Additionally, in |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message|, we know that
|frag_len| <= |msg_hdr->msg_len| so the later tests for |frag_len <
msg_hdr->msg_len| can be more clearly written as |frag_len !=
msg_hdr->msg_len|, since that's the only remaining case.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's d345a24569edf0a966b3d6eaae525f0ca4c5e570)
Change-Id: I038f9f01a1d9379f1ee058b231d80e8b9ce6c2d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1438
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Applying same fix as in dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message. A truncated
DTLS fragment would cause *ok to be clear, but the return value would
still be the number of bytes read.
Problem identified by Emilia Käsper, based on previous issue/patch by Adam
Langley.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 3d5dceac430d7b9b273331931d4d2303f5a2256f)
Change-Id: Ibe30716266e2ee1489c98b922cf53edda096c23c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1437
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, a truncated DTLS fragment in
|dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message| would cause *ok to be cleared, but
the return value would still be the number of bytes read. This would
cause |dtls1_get_message| not to consider it an error and it would
continue processing as normal until the calling function noticed that
*ok was zero.
I can't see an exploit here because |dtls1_get_message| uses
|s->init_num| as the length, which will always be zero from what I can
see.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's aad61c0a57a3b6371496034db61675abcdb81811.)
Change-Id: I2fb0ea93b6e812e19723ada3351f842cc7b2fa91
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1436
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |pqueue_insert| function can fail if one attempts to insert a
duplicate sequence number. When handling a fragment of an out of
sequence message, |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message| would not call
|dtls1_reassemble_fragment| if the fragment's length was zero. It would
then allocate a fresh fragment and attempt to insert it, but ignore the
return value, leaking the fragment.
This allows an attacker to exhaust the memory of a DTLS peer.
Fixes CVE-2014-3507
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 8ca4c4b25e050b881f3aad7017052842b888722d.)
Change-Id: I387e3f6467a0041f6367965ed3c1ad4377b9ac08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1435
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In |dtls1_reassemble_fragment|, the value of
|msg_hdr->frag_off+frag_len| was being checked against the maximum
handshake message size, but then |msg_len| bytes were allocated for the
fragment buffer. This means that so long as the fragment was within the
allowed size, the pending handshake message could consume 16MB + 2MB
(for the reassembly bitmap). Approx 10 outstanding handshake messages
are allowed, meaning that an attacker could consume ~180MB per DTLS
connection.
In the non-fragmented path (in |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message|), no
check was applied.
Fixes CVE-2014-3506
Wholly based on patch by Adam Langley with one minor amendment.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 0598468fc04fb0cf2438c4ee635b587aac1bcce6)
Change-Id: I4849498eabb45ec973fcb988d639b23145891e25
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1434
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |item| variable, in both of these cases, may contain a pointer to a
|pitem| structure within |s->d1->buffered_messages|. It was being freed
in the error case while still being in |buffered_messages|. When the
error later caused the |SSL*| to be destroyed, the item would be double
freed.
Thanks to Wah-Teh Chang for spotting that the fix in 1632ef74 was
inconsistent with the other error paths (but correct).
Fixes CVE-2014-3505
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 49850075555893c9c60d5b981deb697f3b9515ea)
Change-Id: Ie40007184f6194ba032b4213c18d36254e80aaa6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1432
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This function serialises a PKCS#7 structure containing a number of
certificates.
Change-Id: Iaf15887e1060d5d201d5a3dd3dca8d51105ee6d6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1431
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When shifting data because extra ASN.1 length bytes were needed, the
data was moved from the start of the ASN.1 length, not the start of the
ASN.1 data.
Change-Id: Ib13d5e4e878774df2af0505c0297eff6cf781728
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1430
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Remove the assumption that the build directory is a subdirectory of the source
directory.
Change-Id: Iab89e4165b3ee2f9337bcc6e76a48c8fb94a0b92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1417
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When the write size was exactly SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH+1 and record
splitting is needed, an extra byte would be added to the max size of the
message to be written. This would cause the requested size to not exceed
the max. If the SSL_WANT_WRITE error were returned, the next packet
would not get the extra byte added to the max packet size since
record_split_done is set. Since a different set of arguments
(SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH+1 vs SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH) would be passed
to do_ssl3_write, it would return an "SSL3_WRITE_PENDING:bad write
retry" error.
To avoid a failure in the opposite direction, the max variable increment
is removed as well. This can happen when SSL_MODE_ENABLE_PARTIAL_WRITE
is not enabled and the call to ssl3_write_bytes contains, e.g., a buffer
of 2*SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH, where the first call into do_ssl3_write
succeeds writing the first SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH bytes, but writing
the second SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH bytes fails. This means the first
time the the second section of SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH bytes has called
do_ssl3_write with "max" bytes, but next call to ssl3_write_bytes in
turn calls into do_ssl3_write with "max+1" bytes.
Change-Id: Icf8453195c1145a54d31b8e8146801118207df03
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1420
Reviewed-by: Kenny Root <kroot@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Avoid needing to manually increment the reference count and using the right
lock, both here and in Chromium.
Change-Id: If116ebc224cfb1c4711f7e2c06f1fd2c97af21dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1415
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reference counting should be internal to the type, otherwise callers need to
know which lock to use.
Change-Id: If4d805876a321ef6dece115c805e605584ff311e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1414
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
bn_get_bits5 always reads two bytes, even when it doesn't need to. For some
sizes of |p|, this can result in reading just past the edge of the array.
Unroll the first iteration of the loop and avoid reading out of bounds.
Replace bn_get_bits5 altogether in C as it's not doing anything interesting.
Change-Id: Ibcc8cea7d9c644a2639445396455da47fe869a5c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1393
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Replace the tree-like structure by a linear approach, with fewer special
cases to handle value 0.
(Imported from upstream's d5213519c0ed87c71136084e7e843a4125ecc024.)
Change-Id: Icdd4815066bdbab0d2c0020db6a8cacc49b3d82a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1400
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Add a framework for testing the asynchronous codepath. Move some handshake
state machine coverage tests to cover a range of record-layer and
handshake-layer asynchronicity.
This adds tests for the previous two async bugs fixed.
Change-Id: I422ef33ba3eeb0ad04766871ed8bc59b677b169e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1410
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Any ssl3_get_* function that takes ownership of something before the
ssl_get_message call can't early-return without cleanup work.
This fixes valgrind on ClientAuth-Server-Async.
Change-Id: Ie7f0b37cac4d4bb7e06c00bae091fee0386c22da
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1413
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
- DTLS server code didn't account for the new ClientHello state. This looks
like it only matters if a DTLS server uses select_certificate_cb and returns
asynchronously.
- State A transitions immediately to B and is redundant. No code distinguishes
A and B.
- The ssl_get_message call transitions to the second state (originally C). This
makes the explicit transition to C a no-op. More of a problem,
ssl_get_message may return asynchronously and remain in its second state if the
handshake body had not completed yet. Fix this by splitting state C in two.
Combined with the above change, this results in only the top few states getting
reshuffled.
This fixes the server async tests.
Change-Id: I46703bcd205988b118217b6424ba4f88e731be5a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1412
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A single va_list may not be used twice. Nothing calls BIO_vprintf and it just
(v)snprintfs into a buffer anyway, so remove it. If it's actually needed, we
can fiddle with va_copy and the lack of it in C89 later, but anything that
actually cares can just assemble the output externally.
Add a test in bio_test.c.
BUG=399546
Change-Id: Ia40a68b31cb5984d817e9c55351f49d9d6c964c1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1391
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
PEDANTIC was not closed, but rather the compiler being used.
Change-Id: I743118f1481adddcd163406be72926fff6c87338
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1388
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
With the removal of the freelist itself, these macros are
superfluous. Remove them in favore of OPENSSL_malloc and OPENSSL_free.
Change-Id: I4bfeff8ea087b9e16c7c32d7c1bdb7a07e7dd03e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1389
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The memory freelist maintained by OpenSSL claims to be a performance
optimization for platforms that have a slow malloc/free
implementation. This should not be the case on modern
linux/glibc. Remove the freelist as it poses a potential security
hazard of buffer-reuse that is of "initialized" memory that will not
be caught be tools such as valgrind.
Change-Id: I3cfa6a05f9bdfbbba7820060bae5a673dee43014
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1385
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The code guarded by PKCS1_CHECK appears to be unhelpful, and the guard
is explicitly undefined in ssl_locl.h Remove both.
Change-Id: I3cd45a744a8f35b02181b1e48fd1ef11af5e6f4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1383
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Use it to test DHE-RSA in BoringSSL.
Change-Id: I88f7bfa76507a6f60234d61d494c9f94b7df4e0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1377
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Default to the number of CPUs. Avoids the tests launching 64 valgrinds in
parallel on machines without gobs of memory.
Change-Id: I9eeb365b48aa7407e303d161f90ce69a591a884c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1375
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Assert that inappropriate fallbacks are detected, but if the client_version
matches the server's highest version, do not abort the handshake.
Change-Id: I9d72570bce45e1eb23fc2b74a3c5fca10562e573
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1373
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Should have test coverage there as long as we care about supporting it.
Change-Id: Ic67539228b550f2ebd0b543d5a58640913b0474b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1371
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
TODO indicated that it was unused, and commented. Any existing users are already broken.
Change-Id: I75ebaf3f20015845d8c81eecffe2a4dfbdbe18e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1386
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A modern TLS library without full support for TLS does not make sense.
Change-Id: I032537d1412f6e4effc9a2dd47123baf0084b4c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1382
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OPENSSL_FIPS was removed in 64f4c91b89,
but these definitions in crypto/pem remained.
Change-Id: Ia85dd3fd7161f0b33b471b17643767b2b33fdda6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1381
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OPENSSL_NO_CAMELLIA has already been effectively defined, including in
opensslfeatures.h. This commit removes the last ifdef-protected code
guarded by OPENSSL_NO_CAMELLIA.
Change-Id: I58dc79dbe7a77843a641d9216f40f1d7d63fcc40
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1380
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's not built. The problem is worked around by the padding extension now.
Change-Id: If577efdae57d1bca4e0a626486fc0502c3567ebb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1374
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I didn't mark these functions as OPENSSL_EXPORT in the first place
because I was hoping that they wouldn't be needed. However, WebRTC and
libjingle are using them.
Change-Id: I7a9de770a0a2213e99725b9b5ac7d3d13754ebfd
The original functions do an ascii_to_ucs2 transformation on the password.
Deprecate them in favor of making that encoding the caller's problem.
ascii_to_ucs2 doesn't handle, say, UTF-8 anyway. And with the original OpenSSL
function, some ciphers would do the transformation, and some wouldn't making
the text-string/bytes-string confusion even messier.
BUG=399121
Change-Id: I7d1cea20a260f21eec2e8ffb7cd6be239fe92873
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1347
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
PNaCl builds BoringSSL with OPENSSL_NO_ASM, but the new OPENSSL_cleanse
was using inline assembly anyway. It appears that even though the inline
asm was empty, it still breaks the PNaCl build:
disallowed: inline assembly: call void asm sideeffect "", "r,~{memory}"(i8* %.asptr319), !dbg !96986
With this change, we don't have any compiler scarecrows for
OPENSSL_cleanse any longer when using OPENSSL_NO_ASM :( Maybe, one day,
we'll get memset_s in our base platform.
Change-Id: Ia359f6bcc2000be18a6f15de10fc683452151741
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1353
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some phones have a buggy NEON unit and the Poly1305 NEON code fails on
them, even though other NEON code appears to work fine.
This change:
1) Fixes a bug where NEON was assumed even when the code wasn't compiled
in NEON mode.
2) Adds a second NEON control bit that can be disabled in order to run
NEON code, but not the Poly1305 NEON code.
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=341598
Change-Id: Icb121bf8dba47c7a46c7667f676ff7a4bc973625
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1351
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
