This ends up under half the size of the original file.
BUG=129
Change-Id: Idec69d9517bd57cee6b3b83bc0cce05396565b70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14305
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This also adds a few missing assertions (X25519 returns true in normal
cases and, even when it returns zero, it still writes to out.)
BUG=129
Change-Id: I63f7e9025f88b2ec309382b66fc915acca6513a9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14030
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ie64a445a42fb3a6d16818b1fabba8481e6e9ad94
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14029
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: Id7a92285601ff4276f4015eaee290bf77aa22b47
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13628
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: I603054193a20c2bcc3ac1724f9b29d6384d9f62a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13626
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ibbd6d0804a75cb17ff33f64d4cdf9ae80b26e9df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13867
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: I227ffa2da4e220075de296fb5b94d043f4e032e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13627
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
For now, this is the laziest conversion possible. The intent is to just
get the build setup ready so that we can get everything working in our
consumers. The intended end state is:
- The standalone build produces three test targets, one per library:
{crypto,ssl,decrepit}_tests.
- Each FOO_test is made up of:
FOO/**/*_test.cc
crypto/test/gtest_main.cc
test_support
- generate_build_files.py emits variables crypto_test_sources and
ssl_test_sources. These variables are populated with FindCFiles,
looking for *_test.cc.
- The consuming file assembles those variables into the two test targets
(plus decrepit) from there. This avoids having generate_build_files.py
emit actual build rules.
- Our standalone builders, Chromium, and Android just run the top-level
test targets using whatever GTest-based reporting story they have.
In transition, we start by converting one of two tests in each library
to populate the three test targets. Those are added to all_tests.json
and all_tests.go hacked to handle them transparently. This keeps our
standalone builder working.
generate_build_files.py, to start with, populates the new source lists
manually and subtracts them out of the old machinery. We emit both for
the time being. When this change rolls in, we'll write all the build
glue needed to build the GTest-based tests and add it to consumers'
continuous builders.
Next, we'll subsume a file-based test and get the consumers working with
that. (I.e. make sure the GTest targets can depend on a data file.)
Once that's all done, we'll be sure all this will work. At that point,
we start subsuming the remaining tests into the GTest targets and,
asynchronously, rewriting tests to use GTest properly rather than
cursory conversion here.
When all non-GTest tests are gone, the old generate_build_files.py hooks
will be removed, consumers updated to not depend on them, and standalone
builders converted to not rely on all_tests.go, which can then be
removed. (Unless bits end up being needed as a malloc test driver. I'm
thinking we'll want to do something with --gtest_filter.)
As part of this CL, I've bumped the CMake requirements (for
target_include_directories) and added a few suppressions for warnings
that GTest doesn't pass.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I881b26b07a8739cc0b52dbb51a30956908e1b71a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13232
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
BUG=chromium:682816
Change-Id: I2345d6db83441691fe0c1ab6d7c6da4d24777849
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13203
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commit def9b46801.
(I should have uploaded a new version before sending to the commit queue.)
Change-Id: Iaead89c8d7fc1f56e6294d869db9238b467f520a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13202
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Before RFC 7539 we had a ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suite that had a 64/64
nonce/counter split (as DJB's original ChaCha20 did). RFC 7539 changed
that to 96/32 and we've supported both for some time.
This change removes the old version and the TLS cipher suites that used
it.
Change-Id: Icd9c2117c657f3aa6df55990c618d562194ef0e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13201
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Iaac633616a54ba1ed04c14e4778865c169a68621
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12703
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
AES-GCM-SIV is an AEAD with nonce-misuse resistance. It can reuse
hardware support for AES-GCM and thus encrypt at ~66% the speed, and
decrypt at 100% the speed, of AES-GCM.
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-02
This implementation is generic, not optimised, and reuses existing AES
and GHASH support as much as possible. It is guarded by !OPENSSL_SMALL,
at least for now.
Change-Id: Ia9f77b256ef5dfb8588bb9ecfe6ee0e827626f57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12541
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
For the most part, this is with random test data which isn't
particularly good. But we'll be able to add more interesting test
vectors as they come up.
Change-Id: I9c50db7ac2c4bf978d4901000ab32e3642aea82b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12222
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These structures allow for blobs of data (e.g. certificates) to be
deduplicated in memory.
Change-Id: Iebfec90b85d55565848a178b6951562b4ccc083e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11820
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This finally removes the last Android hack. Both Chromium and Android
end up needing this thing (Chromium needs it for WebCrypto but currently
uses the EVP_AEAD version and Android needs it by way of
wpa_supplicant).
On the Android side, the alternative is we finish upstream's
NEED_INTERNAL_AES_WRAP patch, but then it just uses its own key-wrap
implementation. This seems a little silly, considering we have a version
of key-wrap under a different API anyway.
It also doesn't make much sense to leave the EVP_AEAD API around if we
don't want people to use it and Chromium's the only consumer. Remove it
and I'll switch Chromium to the new---er, old--- APIs next roll.
Change-Id: I23a89cda25bddb6ac1033e4cd408165f393d1e6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11410
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This withdraws support for -DBORINGSSL_ENABLE_RC4_TLS, and removes the
RC4 AEADs.
Change-Id: I1321b76bfe047d180743fa46d1b81c5d70c64e81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10940
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These test vectors include the k value, so we can get a deterministic
test.
Change-Id: Ie3cb61a99203cd55b01f4835be7c32043309748d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10701
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This and the following commits will import NIST's ECC test vectors.
Right now all our tests pass if I make P-224 act like P-521, which is
kind of embarrassing. (Other curves are actually tested, but only
because runner.go tests them against BoGo.)
Change-Id: Id0b20451ebd5f10f1d09765a810ad140bea28fa0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10700
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Test vectors taken from one run of bc_test with the -bc flag, along with
a handful of manual test vectors around numbers close to zero. (The
output was compared against bc to make sure it was correct.)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I9e9263ece64a877c8497716cd4713b4c3e44248c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8521
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some files were named 𝑥_test.txt and some 𝑥_tests.txt. This change
unifies around the latter.
Change-Id: Id6f29bad8b998f3c3466655097ef593f7f18f82f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8150
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
One of these tests the distribution of noise polynomials; the other
tests that that agreed-upon keys (prior to whitening) have roughly equal
numbers of 0s and 1s.
Along the way, expose a few more API bits.
Change-Id: I6b04708d41590de45d82ea95bae1033cfccd5d67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8130
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The test vectors are taken from the reference implementation, modified
to output the results of its random-number generator, and the results of
key generation prior to SHA3. This allows the interoperability of the
two implementations to be tested somewhat.
To accomplish the testing, this commit creates a new, lower-level API
that leaves the generation of random numbers and all wire encoding and
decoding up to the caller.
Change-Id: Ifae3517696dde4be4a0b7c1998bdefb789bac599
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's not possible to encode an OID with only one component, so some of
the NIDs do not have encodings. The logic to actually encode OIDs checks
for this (before calling der_it), but not the logic to compute the
sorted OID list.
Without this, OBJ_obj2nid, when given an empty OID, returns something
arbitrary based on the binary search implementation instead of
NID_undef.
Change-Id: Ib68bae349f66eff3d193616eb26491b6668d4b0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7752
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I9c5e66c34d0f1b735c69d033daee5d312e3c2fe7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7410
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The coverage tool revealed that we weren't testing all codepaths of the ChaCha
assembly. Add a standalone test as it's much easier to iterate over all lengths
when there isn't the entire AEAD in the way.
I wasn't able to find a really long test vector, so I generated a random one
with the Go implementation we have in runner.
This test gives us full coverage on the ChaCha20_ssse3 variant. (We'll see how
it fares on the other codepaths when the multi-variant test harnesses get in. I
certainly hope there isn't a more novel way to call ChaCha20 than this...)
Change-Id: I087e421c7351f46ea65dacdc7127e4fbf5f4c0aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7299
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The high bits of the type get used for the V_ASN1_NEG bit, so when used with
ASN1_ANY/ASN1_TYPE, universal tags become ambiguous. This allows one to create
a negative zero, which should be impossible. Impose an upper bound on universal
tags accepted by crypto/asn1 and add a test.
BUG=590615
Change-Id: I363e01ebfde621c8865101f5bcbd5f323fb59e79
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7238
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change imports the following changes from upstream:
6281abc79623419eae6a64768c478272d5d3a426
dfd3322d72a2d49f597b86dab6f37a8cf0f26dbf
f34b095fab1569d093b639bfcc9a77d6020148ff
21376d8ae310cf0455ca2b73c8e9f77cafeb28dd
25efcb44ac88ab34f60047e16a96c9462fad39c1
56353962e7da7e385c3d577581ccc3015ed6d1dc
39c76ceb2d3e51eaff95e04d6e4448f685718f8d
a3d74afcae435c549de8dbaa219fcb30491c1bfb
These contain the “altchains” functionality which allows OpenSSL to
backtrack when chain building.
Change-Id: I8d4bc2ac67b90091f9d46e7355cae878b4ccf37d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6905
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It didn't do too much and I didn't notice that CRYPTO_sysrand wasn't
OPENSSL_EXPORTed, which makes the test impossible on shared-library
builds.
Change-Id: I38986572aa34fa9c0f30075d562b8ee4e1a0c8b8
Callers that lack hardware random may obtain a speed improvement by
calling |RAND_enable_fork_unsafe_buffering|, which enables a
thread-local buffer around reads from /dev/urandom.
Change-Id: I46e675d1679b20434dd520c58ece0f888f38a241
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5792
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This consists mostly of re-adding OpenSSL's implementation of PBKDF2
(very loosely based upon e0d26bb3). The meat of it, namely
|PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC|, was already present, but unused.
In addition, |PKCS8_encrypt| and |PKCS8_decrypt| must be changed to
not perform UCS-2 conversion in the PBES2 case.
Change-Id: Id170ecabc43c79491600051147d1d6d3c7273dbc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5745
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RFC 7359 includes tests for various edge cases. Also, as
CRYPTO_poly1305_update can be used single-shot and streaming, we should
explicitly stress both.
Change-Id: Ie44c203a77624be10397ad05f06ca98d937db76f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5410
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
May as well. Depending on the implementation chosen in cipher/e_aes.c,
AES_encrypt may or may not be hit, so test this entry point explicitly.
Change-Id: Icb02bf3f4b6e5ecbb9e5111f44fbb1b267ead6c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5312
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes EVP_PKEY_HMAC and all the support code around it. EVP_MD requires
a lot of extra glue to support HMAC. This lets us prune it all away.
As a bonus, it removes a (minor) dependency from EVP to the legacy ASN.1 stack.
Change-Id: I5a9e3e39f518429828dbf13d14647fb37d9dc35a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5120
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
