This avoids a conflict with the Chromium build system, which
defines WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN with a different value.
BUG=crbug.com/453196
Change-Id: Ia15ec7c20325c1961af4f32e5208266e5f846f35
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3150
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN before including Windows Platform SDK
headers to preempt naming conflicts and to make the build faster. Avoid
including those headers in BoringSSL headers. Document that Platform
SDK 8.1 or later is required on Windows.
Change-Id: I907ada21dc722527ea37e839c71c5157455a7003
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3100
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds the AES-128-CBC-SHA and AES-256-CBC-SHA AEADs to the
speed test. These AEADs need an 11 byte additional data so the test is
extended to be able to provide that.
Change-Id: I9a57c2321a979a68ab0df9faf1bb26b44a3009c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2922
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This eliminates a source of variability from the benchmarks.
Change-Id: I8ce07bd68e7591f8c5545040b02b96d21609a0e5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2920
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds the stitched RC4-MD5 code from upstream OpenSSL but
exposes it as an AEAD. It's not a normal AEAD (it's stateful thus
doesn't take an nonce) but forcing pre-AEAD cipher suites in the AEAD
interface is less painful than forcing AEADs into the EVP_CIPHER
interface. Over time, more and more cipher suites will be exposed as
TLS-specific AEADs and then ssl/ can drop support for EVP_CIPHER.
See original code from upstream:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/evp/e_rc4_hmac_md5.c
Change-Id: Ia9267b224747f02be6b934ea0b2b50e1f529fab9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1043
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Apart from the obvious little issues, this also works around a
(seeming) libtool/linker:
a.c defines a symbol:
int kFoo;
b.c uses it:
extern int kFoo;
int f() {
return kFoo;
}
compile them:
$ gcc -c a.c
$ gcc -c b.c
and create a dummy main in order to run it, main.c:
int f();
int main() {
return f();
}
this works as expected:
$ gcc main.c a.o b.o
but, if we make an archive:
$ ar q lib.a a.o b.o
and use that:
$ gcc main.c lib.a
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64
"_kFoo", referenced from:
_f in lib.a(b.o)
(It doesn't matter what order the .o files are put into the .a)
Linux and Windows don't seem to have this problem.
nm on a.o shows that the symbol is of type "C", which is a "common symbol"[1].
Basically the linker will merge multiple common symbol definitions together.
If ones makes a.c read:
int kFoo = 0;
Then one gets a type "D" symbol - a "data section symbol" and everything works
just fine.
This might actually be a libtool bug instead of an ld bug: Looking at `xxd
lib.a | less`, the __.SYMDEF SORTED index at the beginning of the archive
doesn't contain an entry for kFoo unless initialised.
Change-Id: I4cdad9ba46e9919221c3cbd79637508959359427
