This change includes C versions of some of the functions from the x86-64
P-256 code that are currently implemented in assembly. These functions
were part of the original submission by Intel and are covered by the ISC
license.
No semantic change; code is commented out.
Change-Id: Ifdd2fac6caeb73d375d6b125fac98f3945003b32
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12861
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
* -loop on the server allows it to keep accepting connections.
* -resume on the client waits to receive a session from the server
and starts a new connection using the previous session.
Change-Id: I27a413c7c1d64edbca94aecc6f112d8d15afbce2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12630
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This dates to
62d05888d1
which intended to be removed in a later Android release once X25519 was
added. That has since happened.
This intentionally leaves the P-521 hooked up for now. Detaching it
completely is a more aggressive change (since it's slightly tied up with
SHA-512) that should wait until removing ECDSA+SHA512 has stuck in Chrome.
Change-Id: I04553c3eddf33a13b6e3e9a6e7ac4c4725676cb0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10923
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This gives a 15-16% perf boost for 1024-bit RSA keys, but 1024-bit RSA
keys are no longer important enough for this code to carry its weight.
Change-Id: Ia9f0e7fec512c28e90754ababade394c1f11984d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12841
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These are regression tests for
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/12525/ that target the
RSAZ-512 code rather than the disabled RSAZ-1024 code.
These were created by extracting p and dmp1 from
ssl/test/rsa_1024_key.pem and creating similar test vectors as with the
AVX2 test vectors. They currently fail, but pass if the RSAZ-512 code is
disabled.
Change-Id: I99dd3f385941ddbb1cc64b5351f4411081b42dd7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12840
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Note that this adds new non-constant-time code into the RSAZ-based
code path.
Change-Id: Ibca3bc523ede131b55c70ac5066c0014df1f5a70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12525
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The input base, |a|, isn't reduced mod |m| in the RSAZ case so
incorrect results are given for out-of-range |a| when the RSAZ
implementation is used. On the other hand, the RSAZ implementation is
more correct as far as constant-time operation w.r.t. |a| is concerned.
Change-Id: Iec4d0195cc303ce442ce687a4b7ea42fb19cfd06
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12524
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This function always returns the full chain and will hopefully eliminate
the need for some code in Conscrypt.
Change-Id: Ib662005322c40824edf09d100a784ff00492896a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12780
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes another dependency on the crypto/x509 code.
Change-Id: Ia72da4d47192954c2b9a32cf4bcfd7498213c0c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12709
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The original bug only affected their big-endian code which we don't
have, but import the test vector anyway. Imported from upstream's
b47f116b1e02d20b1f8a7488be5a04f7cf5bc712.
Change-Id: I349e41d87006533da0e18c948f9cc7dd15f42a44
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12820
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
$1<<32>>32 worked fine with either 32- or 64-bit perl for a good while,
relying on quirk that [pure] 32-bit perl performed it as $1<<0>>0. But
this apparently changed in some version past minimally required 5.10,
and operation result became 0. Yet, it went unnoticed for another while,
because most perl package providers configure their packages with
-Duse64bitint option.
(Imported from upstream's 82e089308bd9a7794a45f0fa3973d7659420fbd8.)
Change-Id: Ie9708bb521c8d7d01afd2e064576f46be2a811a5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12821
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Querying a bit in a BIT STRING is a little finicky. Add some functions
to help with this.
Change-Id: I813b9b6f2d952d61d8717b47bca1344f0ad4b7d1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12800
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The loop is getting a little deeply nested and hard to read.
Change-Id: I3a99fba54c2f352850b83aef91ab72d5d9aabfb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12685
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Also fix the error code. It's a missing extension, not an unexpected
one.
Change-Id: I48e48c37e27173f6d7ac5e993779948ead3706f2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12683
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
So we can report it cleanly out of DevTools, it should behave like
SSL_get_curve_id and be reported on resumption too.
BUG=chromium:658905
Change-Id: I0402e540a1e722e09eaebadf7fb4785d8880c389
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12694
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Also test that TLS 1.3 can be resumed at a different curve.
Change-Id: Ic58e03ad858c861958b7c934813c3e448fb2829c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12692
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The only accessor for this field is the group/curve ID. Switch to only
storing that so no cipher checks are needed to interpret it. Instead,
ignore older values at parse time.
Change-Id: Id0946d4ac9e7482c69e64cc368a9d0cddf328bd3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12693
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Nothing calls this anymore. DHE is nearly gone. This unblocks us from
making key_exchange_info only apply to the curve.
Change-Id: I3099e7222a62441df6e01411767d48166a0729b1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12691
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change removes the use of |X509_get_pubkey| from the TLS <= 1.2
code. That function is replaced with a shallow parse of the certificate
to extract the public key instead.
Change-Id: I8938c6c5a01b32038c6b6fa58eb065e5b44ca6d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12707
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This currently only works for certificates parsed from the network, but
if making several connections that share certificates, some KB of memory
might be saved.
BUG=chromium:671420
Change-Id: I1c7a71d84e1976138641f71830aafff87f795f9d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12706
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change adds a STACK_OF(CRYPTO_BUFFER) to an SSL_SESSION which
contains the raw form of the received certificates. The X509-based
members still exist, but their |enc| buffer will alias the
CRYPTO_BUFFERs.
(This is a second attempt at
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/#/c/12163/.)
BUG=chromium:671420
Change-Id: I508a8a46cab89a5a3fcc0c1224185d63e3d59cb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12705
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OpenSSL includes a leaf certificate in a certificate chain when it's a
client, but doesn't when it's a server. This is also reflected in the
serialisation of sessions.
This change makes the internal semantics consistent: the leaf is always
included in the chain in memory, and never duplicated when serialised.
To maintain the same API, SSL_get_peer_cert_chain will construct a copy
of the chain without the leaf if needed.
Since the serialised format of a client session has changed, an
|is_server| boolean is added to the ASN.1 that defaults to true. Thus
any old client sessions will be parsed as server sessions and (silently)
discarded by a client.
Change-Id: Ibcf72bc8a130cedb423bc0fd3417868e0af3ca3e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12704
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
state is now initialized to SSL_ST_INIT in SSL_HANDSHAKE. If there is no
handshake present, we report SSL_ST_OK. This saves 8 bytes of
per-connection post-handshake memory.
Change-Id: Idb3f7031045caed005bd7712bc8c4b42c81a1d04
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12697
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is to free up moving ssl->state into SSL_HANDSHAKE. ssl->state
serves two purposes right now. First, it is the state tracking for
SSL_HANDSHAKE. Second, it lets the system know there is a handshake
waiting to complete.
Instead, arrange things so that, if there is a handshake waiting to
complete, hs is not NULL. That means we need to initialize it when
creating a new connection and when discovering a renego.
Note this means we cannot make initializing an SSL_HANDSHAKE depend on
client vs. server.
Change-Id: I585a8d7e700c4ffe4d372248d34c44106ad7e7a0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12696
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This avoids needing a extra state around client certificates to avoid
calling the callbacks twice. This does, however, come with a behavior
change: configuring both callbacks won't work. No consumer does this.
(Except bssl_shim which needed slight tweaks.)
Change-Id: Ia5426ed2620e40eecdcf352216c4a46764e31a9a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12690
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is never used. Removing it allows us to implement the old callback
using the new one.
Change-Id: I4be70cc16e609ce79b51836c19fec565c67ff3d6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12689
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Callers doing more interesting things than read and write tend to use
SSL_get_error. SSL_want_{read,write} are still used, however.
Change-Id: I21e83cc8046742857051f755868d86deffd23d81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12688
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reduce the amount of boilerplate needed to add more of these. Also tidy
things up a little.
Change-Id: I90ea7f70dba5a2b38a1fb716faff97eb4f6afafc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12687
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
One of them is used in the new minimal SSL BIO, but cURL doesn't consume
it, so let's just leave it out. A consumer using asynchronous
certificate lookup is unlikely to be doing anything with SSL BIOs.
Change-Id: I10e7bfd643d3a531d42a96a8d675611d13722bd2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12686
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was done by running:
./fuzz/cert -merge=1 ../fuzz/cert_corpus ~/openssl/fuzz/corpora/x509
I bumped the max_len while doing so because some of those are rather
large.
Change-Id: Ic2caa09d5ff9ab05b46363940a91a03f270cbad8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12682
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The error value is -2, but at this point ret has already been set to
some running answer and must be reset to -2.
(This is unreachable. BN_rshift only fails on caller or malloc error,
and it doesn't need to malloc when running in-place.)
Change-Id: I33930da84b00d1906bdee9d09b9504ea8121fac4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12681
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
For folks who prefer the named length constants, the current ones aren't
sufficient because the shared key isn't the private key or a public
value.
Well, it does have the same type as a public value, but it looks silly
to write:
uint8_t secret_key[X25519_PUBLIC_VALUE_LEN];
Change-Id: I391db8ee73e2b4305d0ddd22f6d99f6abbc6b45b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12680
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is to free up the hs->state name for the upper-level handshake
state.
Change-Id: I1183a329f698c56911f3879a91809edad5b5e94e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12695
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib9df4e8f797c9af3362354cc6716171fd65600de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12720
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Iaac633616a54ba1ed04c14e4778865c169a68621
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12703
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commits 5a6e616961 and
e8509090cf. I'm going to unify how the
chains are kept in memory between client and server first otherwise the
mess just keeps growing.
Change-Id: I76df0d94c9053b2454821d22a3c97951b6419831
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12701
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ie947ab176d10feb709c6e135d5241c6cf605b8e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12700
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This currently only works for certificates parsed from the network, but
if making several connections that share certificates, some KB of memory
might be saved.
Change-Id: I0ea4589d7a8b5c41df225ad7f282b6d1376a8db4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12164
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This change adds a STACK_OF(CRYPTO_BUFFER) to an SSL_SESSION which
contains the raw form of the received certificates. The X509-based
members still exist, but their |enc| buffer will alias the
CRYPTO_BUFFERs.
The serialisation format of SSL_SESSIONs is also changed, in a backwards
compatible way. Previously, some sessions would duplicate the leaf
certificate in the certificate chain. These sessions can still be read,
but will be written in a way incompatible with older versions of the
code. This should be fine because the situation where multiple versions
exchange serialised sessions is at the server, and the server doesn't
duplicate the leaf certifiate in the chain anyway.
Change-Id: Id3b75d24f1745795315cb7f8089a4ee4263fa938
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12163
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
A recent change to curl[1] added support for HTTPS proxies, which
involves running a TLS connection inside another TLS connection. This
was done by using SSL BIOs, which we removed from BoringSSL for being
crazy.
This change adds a stripped-down version of the SSL BIO to decrepit in
order to suport curl.
[1] cb4e2be7c6
Change-Id: I9cb8f2db5b28a5a70724f6f93544297c380ac124
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12631
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Right now the only way to set an OCSP response is SSL_CTX_set_ocsp_response
however this assumes that all the SSLs generated from a SSL_CTX share the
same OCSP response, which is wrong.
This is similar to the OpenSSL "function" SSL_get_tlsext_status_ocsp_resp,
the main difference being that this doesn't take ownership of the OCSP buffer.
In order to avoid memory duplication in case SSL_CTX has its own response,
a CRYPTO_BUFFER is used for both SSL_CTX and SSL.
Change-Id: I3a0697f82b805ac42a22be9b6bb596aa0b530025
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12660
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
All callers were long since updated.
Change-Id: Ibdc9b186076dfbcbc3bd7dcc72610c8d5a522cfc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12624
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Prior to 87eab4902d, due to some
confusions between configuration and connection state, SSL_clear had the
side effect of offering the previously established session on the new
connection.
wpa_supplicant relies on this behavior, so restore it for TLS 1.2 and
below and add a test. (This behavior is largely incompatible with TLS
1.3's post-handshake tickets, so it won't work in 1.3. It'll act as if
we configured an unresumable session instead.)
Change-Id: Iaee8c0afc1cb65c0ab7397435602732b901b1c2d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12632
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
size_t at the public API, uint8_t on the SSL structs since everything
fits in there comfortably.
Change-Id: I837c3b21e04e03dfb957c1a3e6770300d0b49c0b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12638
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It is impossible to have an SSL* without a corresponding method.
Change-Id: Icaf826a06aaaa2c7caf98b1e4a950f9c1d48e6bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12621
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There is no need to retain it beyond this point.
Change-Id: Ib5722ab30fc013380198b1582d1240f0fe0aa770
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12620
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
