EKR is unlikely to resolve this TODO anytime soon.
Change-Id: I2cf6b4ad4f643048d1a683d60b4b90e2b1230aae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9155
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This makes it easier to understand the |sLen|-related logic.
Change-Id: I98da4f4f7c82d5481544940407e6cc6a963f7e5b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9171
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We handle this correctly but never wrote a test for it. Noticed this in
chatting about the second ClientHello.version bug workaround with Eric
Rescorla.
Change-Id: I09bc6c995d07c0f2c9936031b52c3c639ed3695e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9154
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The old implementation had a lot of size_t/int confusion. It also
accepted non-minimally-encoded OIDs. Unlike the old implementation, the
new one does not fall back to BIGNUMs and does not attempt to
pretty-print OIDs with components which do not fit in a uint64_t. Add
tests for these cases.
With this new implementation, hopefully we'll have a much easier time
enabling MSVC's size_t truncation warning later.
Change-Id: I602102b97cf9b02d874644f8ef67fe9bac70e45e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9131
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This eliminates duplicate logic.
Change-Id: I283273ae152f3644df4384558ee4a021f8c2d454
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9104
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BN_mod_inverse_odd was always being used on 64-bit platforms and was being used
for all curves with an order of 450 bits or smaller (basically, everything but
P-521). We generally don't care much about minor differences in the speed of
verifying signatures using curves other than P-256 and P-384. It is better to
always use the same algorithm.
This also allows |bn_mod_inverse_general|, |bn_mod_inverse_no_branch|, and
|BN_mod_inverse| to be dropped from programs that can somehow avoid linking in
the RSA key generation and RSA CRT recovery code.
Change-Id: I79b94bff23d2b07d5e0c704f7d44538797f8c7a0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9103
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The main RSA public modulus size of concern is 2048 bits.
bn_mod_inverse_odd is already used for public moduli of 2048 bits and
smaller on 64-bit platforms, so for 64-bit it is a no-op. For 32-bit
x86, this seems to slightly decrease the speed of RSA signing, but not
by a lot, and plus we don't care about RSA signing performance much on
32-bit platforms. It's better to have all platforms using the same
algorithms.
Change-Id: I869dbfc98994e36a04a535c1fe63b14a902a4f13
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9102
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is a step towards exposing |bn_mod_inverse_odd| for use outside
of crypto/bn/gcd.c.
Change-Id: I2968f1e43306c03775b3573a022edd92f4e91df2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9101
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is in preparation for factoring out the binary Euclidean
implementation (the one used for odd numbers that aren't too big) for
direct use from outside of crypto/bn/gcd.c. The goal is to make the
resultant |BN_mod_inverse_odd|'s signature similar to
|BN_mod_inverse_blinded|. Thus, the logic for reducing the final result
isn't factored out because that yet-to-be-created |BN_mod_inverse_odd|
will need to do it itself.
Change-Id: Iaecb79fb17d13c774c4fb6ade8742937780b0006
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9100
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is very far from all of it, but I did some easy ones before I got
bored. Snapshot the progress until someone else wants to continue this.
BUG=22
Change-Id: I2609e9766d883a273e53e01a75a4b1d4700e2436
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9132
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Only X509_up_ref left (it's still waiting on a few external callers).
BUG=89
Change-Id: Ia2aec2bb0a944356cb1ce29f3b58a26bdb8a9977
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9141
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Inch towards OpenSSL 1.1.0 compatibility.
BUG=91
Change-Id: Ia45b6bdb5114d0891fdffdef0b5868920324ecec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9140
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Fix non-standard variable names, return value convention, unsigned vs
size_t, etc. This also fixes one size_t truncation warning.
BUG=22
Change-Id: Ibe083db90e8dac45d64da9ead8f519dd2fea96ea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9133
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OBJ_obj2txt's implementation is kind of scary. Also it casts between int
and size_t a lot. In preparation for rewriting it, add a test.
Change-Id: Iefb1d0cddff58d67e5b04ec332477aab8aa687b6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9130
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We're starting to get quite a lot of these ALL-CAPS.md documents.
There's been enough questions around how to properly use types like
EVP_MD_CTX that we probably should write down some of these common
rules.
Change-Id: I125f4e82efb168a071b54ff76c5af34c42ff4800
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9115
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
tls13_process_certificate can take a boolean for whether anonymous is
allowed. This does change the error on the client slightly, but I think
this is correct anyway. It is not a syntax error for the server to send
no certificates in so far as the Certificate message allows it. It's
just illegal.
Change-Id: I1af80dacf23f50aad0b1fbd884bc068a40714399
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9072
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We have tests for this as a server, but none as a client. Extend the
certificate verification tests here. This is in preparation for ensuring
that TLS 1.3 session resumption works correctly.
Change-Id: I9ab9f42838ffd69f73fbd877b0cdfaf31caea707
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9111
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
No sense in having it in both the 1.2 and 1.3 code.
Change-Id: Ib3854714afed24253af7f4bcee26d25e95a10211
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9071
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
While the sanity check isn't insane (one should arrange for sessions to
be invalidated once client auth settings change, and a sid_ctx is one
way to do it), this check lives in a poor place to enforce configuration
mistakes. To be effective, it needs to happen at the start of the
handshake, independent of the ClientHello from the peer.
But the benefit this check gives is low compared to the trouble it will
be to continually maintain this difference from OpenSSL (our own
ssl_test and bssl_shim forget to set a dummy sid_ctx). Instead, remove
it so we don't have to duplicate it across TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. Also so
we don't have weird failures which only manifest once a resuming client
connects.
Change-Id: Ia7f88711701afde5e26b7782c2264ce78dccc89b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9112
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We'd gotten rid of the macros, but not the underlying asn1_GetSequence
which is unused. Sadly this doesn't quite get rid of ASN1_(const_)?CTX.
There's still some code in the rest of crypto/asn1 that uses it.
Change-Id: I2ba8708ac5b20982295fbe9c898fef8f9b635704
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9113
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Extend the DTLS mock clock to apply to sessions too and test that
resumption behaves as expected.
Change-Id: Ib8fdec91b36e11cfa032872b63cf589f93b3da13
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9110
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We almost forgot to handle this in TLS 1.3, so add a test for it.
Change-Id: I28600325d8fb6c09365e909db607cbace12ecac7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9093
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We broke this to varying degrees ages ago.
This is the logic to implement the variations of rules in TLS to discard
sessions after a failed connection, where a failed connection could be
one of:
- A connection that was not cleanly shut down.
- A connection that received a fatal alert.
The first one is nonsense since close_notify does not actually work in
the real world. The second is a vaguely more plausible but...
- A stateless ticket-based server can't drop sessions anyway.
- In TLS 1.3, a client may receive many tickets over the lifetime of a
single connection. With an external session cache like ours which may,
in theory, but multithreaded, this will be a huge hassle to track.
- A client may well attempt to establish a connection and reuse the
session before we receive the fatal alert, so any application state we
hope to manage won't really work.
- An attacker can always close the connection before the fatal alert, so
whatever security policy clearing the session gave is easily
bypassable.
Implementation-wise, this has basically never worked. The
ssl_clear_bad_session logic called into SSL_CTX_remove_session which
relied on the internal session cache. (Sessions not in the internal
session cache don't get removed.) The internal session cache was only
useful for a server, where tickets prevent this mechanism from doing
anything. For a client, we since removed the internal session cache, so
nothing got removed. The API for a client also did not work as it gave
the SSL_SESSION, not the SSL, so a consumer would not know the key to
invalidate anyway.
The recent session state splitting change further broke this.
Moreover, calling into SSL_CTX_remove_session logic like that is
extremely dubious because it mutates the not_resumable flag on the
SSL_SESSION which isn't thread-safe.
Spec-wise, TLS 1.3 has downgraded the MUST to a SHOULD.
Given all that mess, just remove this code. It is no longer necessary to
call SSL_shutdown just to make session caching work.
Change-Id: Ib601937bfc5f6b40436941e1c86566906bb3165d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9091
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Save a little bit of typing at the call site.
Change-Id: I818535409b57a694e5e0ea0e9741d89f2be89375
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9090
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We will now send tickets as a server and accept them as a
client. Correctly offering and resuming them in the handshake will be
implemented in a follow-up.
Now that we're actually processing draft 14 tickets, bump the draft
version.
Change-Id: I304320a29c4ffe564fa9c00642a4ace96ff8d871
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8982
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
As of https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/530, they're gone.
They're still allowed just before the ClientHello or ServerHello, which
is kind of odd, but so it goes.
BUG=86
Change-Id: I3d556ab45e42d0755d23566e006c0db9af35b7b6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9114
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Id6a7443246479c62cbe0024e2131a2013959e21e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9078
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TLS 1.3 requires callers use the callback rather than SSL_get_session.
Change-Id: I2caae70e641b102ce93256c847c178871bf78bac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9076
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I057e19a9547a14b3950395db4318eaf0da01ec13
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9079
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OpenSSL 1.1.0 added a function to tell if an SSL* is DTLS or not. This
is probably a good idea, especially since SSL_version returns
non-normalized versions.
BUG=91
Change-Id: I25c6cf08b2ebabf0c610c74691de103399f729bc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9077
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
|BN_mod_exp_mont| uses |BN_nnmod| so it seems like
|BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime| should too. Further, I created
these test vectors by doing the math by hand, and the tests
passed for |BN_mod_exp_mont| but failed for
|BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime| without this change.
Change-Id: I7cffa1375e94dd8eaee87ada78285cd67fff1bac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9032
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
None of the SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT codepaths will ever be
reached if SSL_VERIFY_PEER is unset. If we've gotten as far as getting a
Certificate message, consider SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT alone
significant grounds for rejecting no peer certificate.
Change-Id: I2c6be4269d65b2467b86b1fc7d76ac47ca735553
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I998f69269cdf813da19ccccc208b476f3501c8c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8991
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We'll need to update it on occasion, but we should not update our
default ClientHello without noticing.
Change-Id: I19ca52fdbe10e3ac14413fecd16be2e58af5a1f6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9075
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Where we can move uncommon logic to the caller, we probably ought to.
Change-Id: I54a09fffffc20290be05295137ccb605d562cad0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9069
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The functions appear to try to handle negative inputs, but it isn't
clear how negative inputs are supposed to work and/or if these
functions work the way they are supposed to given negative inputs.
There seems to be no legitimate reason to pass these functions negative
inputs, so just document that negative inputs shouldn't be used. More
specifically, document that the inputs should be in the range [0, n)
where |n| is the Montgomery modulus.
Change-Id: Id8732fb89616f10e673704e6fa09d78926c402d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9033
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Have |bn_correct_top| fix |bn->neg| if the input is zero so that we
don't have negative zeros lying around.
Thanks to Brian Smith for noticing.
Change-Id: I91bcadebc8e353bb29c81c4367e85853886c8e4e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9074
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=59
Change-Id: If3a788ec1328226d69293996845fa1d14690bf40
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9068
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
SSL_set_bio is a nightmare.
In f715c42322, we noticed that, among
other problems, SSL_set_bio's actual behavior did not match how
SSL_set_rfd was calling it due to an asymmetry in the rbio/wbio
handling. This resulted in SSL_set_fd/SSL_set_rfd calls to crash. We
decided that SSL_set_rfd's believed semantics were definitive and
changed SSL_set_bio.
Upstream, in 65e2d672548e7c4bcb28f1c5c835362830b1745b, decided that
SSL_set_bio's behavior, asymmetry and all, was definitive and that the
SSL_set_rfd crash was a bug in SSL_set_rfd. Accordingly, they switched
the fd callers to use the side-specific setters, new in 1.1.0.
Align with upstream's behavior and add tests for all of SSL_set_bio's
insanity. Also export the new side-specific setters in anticipation of
wanting to be mostly compatible with OpenSSL 1.1.0.
Change-Id: Iceac9508711f79750a3cc2ded081b2bb2cbf54d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9064
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If two CRLs are equivalent then use the one with a later lastUpdate field:
this will result in the newest CRL available being used.
(Imported from upstream's 325da8231c8d441e6bb7f15d1a5a23ff63c842e5 and
3dc160e9be6dcaeec9345fbb61b1c427d7026103.)
Change-Id: I8c722663b979dfe08728d091697d8b8204dc265c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8947
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Negative zeros are nuts, but it will probably be a while before we've
fixed everything that can create them. Fix both to consistently print
'-0' rather than '0' so failures are easier to diagnose (BN_cmp believes
the values are different.)
Change-Id: Ic38d90601b43f66219d8f44ca085432106cf98e3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9073
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Simplify the calculation of the Montgomery constants in
|BN_MONT_CTX_set|, making the inversion constant-time. It should also
be faster by avoiding any use of the |BIGNUM| API in favor of using
only 64-bit arithmetic.
Now it's obvious how it works. /s
Change-Id: I59a1e1c3631f426fbeabd0c752e0de44bcb5fd75
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9031
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
A caller using EVP_Digest* which a priori knows tighter bounds on the
hash function used (perhaps because it is always a particular hash) can
assume the function will not write more bytes than the size of the hash.
The letter of the rules before vaguely[*] allowed for more than
EVP_MD_MAX_SIZE bytes written which made for some unreasonable code in
Chromium. Officially clarify this and add tests which, when paired with
valgrind and ASan prove it.
BUG=59
[*] Not really. I think it already promised the output length will be
both the number of bytes written and the size of the hash and the size
of the hash is given by what the function promises to compute. Meh.
Change-Id: I736d526e81cca30475c90897bca896293ff30278
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9066
Reviewed-by: Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idf9db184348140972e57b2a8fa30dc9cb8b2e0f2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9065
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
In TLS 1.2, this was allowed to be empty for the weird SHA-1 fallback
logic. In TLS 1.3, not only is the fallback logic gone, but omitting
them is a syntactic error.
struct {
opaque certificate_request_context<0..2^8-1>;
SignatureScheme
supported_signature_algorithms<2..2^16-2>;
DistinguishedName certificate_authorities<0..2^16-1>;
CertificateExtension certificate_extensions<0..2^16-1>;
} CertificateRequest;
Thanks to Eric Rescorla for pointing this out.
Change-Id: I4991e59bc4647bb665aaf920ed4836191cea3a5a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9062
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We were sending decode_error, but the spec explicitly says (RFC 5246):
unsupported_extension
sent by clients that receive an extended server hello containing
an extension that they did not put in the corresponding client
hello. This message is always fatal.
Also add a test for this when it's a known but unoffered extension. We
actually end up putting these in different codepaths now due to the
custom extensions stuff.
Thanks to Eric Rescorla for pointing this out.
Change-Id: If6c8033d4cfe69ef8af5678b873b25e0dbadfc4f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9061
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
As of a recent change, test_support always included the headers, which
causes Android's new build-system to be unhappy. It doesn't want to
include headers. Split them into test_support_headers and test_support
to match the other keys.
Then fix up references:
- Android's new build system only wants the sources. Fix this.
- Chromium's GN and GYP theoretically want the sources and headers, but
we've never supplied the headers because this isn't enforced at all.
Fix this. Headers are selected based on what target the header
"belongs to".
- Bazel has no change except to sort test_support_sources.
Change-Id: I85809e70a71236b5e91d87f87bb73bc2ea289251
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9044
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It seems much safer for the default value of |verify_result| to be an
error value.
Change-Id: I372ec19c41d77516ed12d0169969994f7d23ed70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9063
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
