This gives us a sigalg-based API for configuring signing algorithms.
Change-Id: Ib746a56ebd1061eadd2620cdb140d5171b59bc02
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8784
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I2f5c45e0e491f9dd25c2463710697599fea708ed
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8794
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The server must switch the outgoing keys early so that client
certificate alerts are sent with the right keys. (Also so that half-RTT
data may be sent.)
Change-Id: Id5482c811aa0b747ab646453b3856a83f23d3f06
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8791
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TLS 1.3 will go through very different code than everything else. Even
SSL 3.0 is somewhat special-cased now. Move the invalid signature tests
there and run at all versions.
Change-Id: Idd0ee9aac2939c0c8fd9af2ea7b4a22942121c60
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8775
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The TLS 1.3 CertificateRequest code advertised the signing set, not the
verify set. It also wasn't saving the peer's signature algorithm.
Change-Id: I62247d5703e30d8463c92f3d597dbeb403b355ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8774
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
ServerKeyExchange and SigningHash are both very 1.2-specific names.
Replace with names that fit both 1.2 and 1.3 (and are a bit shorter).
Also fix a reference to ServerKeyExchange in sign.go.
Change-Id: I25d4ff135cc77cc545f0f9e94014244d56a9e96b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8773
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The API is definitive and works in TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: Ifefa295bc792f603b297e796559355f66f668811
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8772
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The extension is not defined in TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: I5eb85f7142be7e11f1a9c0e4680e8ace9ac50feb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8771
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Resumption is not yet implemented.
Change-Id: I7c3df2912456a0e0d5339d7b0b1f5819f958e900
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8770
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The preceding client CA bug is actually almost unreachable since the
list is initialized to a non-NULL empty list. But if one tries hard
enough, a NULL one is possible.
Change-Id: I49e69511bf65b0178c4e0acdb887f8ba7d85faff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8769
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Tested against the C code.
Change-Id: I62639e1e46cd4f57625be5d4ff7f6902b318c278
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8768
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We need EnableAllCiphers to make progress so, temporarily, defer the PSK
error. Also flip a true/false bug in the OCSP stapling logic.
Change-Id: Iad597c84393e1400c42b8b290eedc16f73f5ed30
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8766
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
deriveTrafficAEAD gets confused by the EnableAllCiphers bug. As a hack,
just return the nil cipher. We only need to progress far enough to read
the shim's error code.
Change-Id: I72d25ac463a03a0e99dd08c38a1a7daef1f94311
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8763
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We'll enable it again later, but the initial land of the 1.3 handshake
will not do resumption. In preparation, turn those off.
Change-Id: I5f98b6a9422eb96be26c4ec41ca7ecde5f592da7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8765
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In preparation for getting the tests going.
Change-Id: Ifd2ab09e6ce91f99abde759d5db8dc6554521572
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8764
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Otherwise adding it to the handshake hash doesn't work right.
Change-Id: I2fabae72e8b088a5df26bbeac946f19144d58733
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8762
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We'll enable them once we've gotten it working. For now, our TLS 1.3
believes there is no PSK.
Change-Id: I5ae51266927c8469c671844da9a0f7387c297050
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8760
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
RSASSA-PSS with SHA-512 is slightly too large for 1024-bit RSA. One
should not be using 1024-bit RSA, but it's common enough for tests
(including our own in runner before they were regenerated), that we
should probably do the size check and avoid unnecessary turbulence to
everyone else's test setups.
Change-Id: If0c7e401d7d05404755cba4cbff76de3bc65c138
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8746
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Tested by having client and server talk to each other. This adds the
certificate_extensions field to CertificateRequest which I'd previously
missed. (We completely ignore the field, with the expectation that the C
code won't have anything useful to do with it either.)
Change-Id: I74f96acd36747d4b6a6f533535e36ea8e94d2be8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8710
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, revised by davidben.]
Change-Id: If1d45c33994476f4bc9cd69831b6bbed40f792d0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8599
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
For now, skip the 1.2 -> 1.1 signal since that will affect shipping
code. We may as well enable it too, but wait until things have settled
down. This implements the version in draft-14 since draft-13's isn't
backwards-compatible.
Change-Id: I46be43e6f4c5203eb4ae006d1c6a2fe7d7a949ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8724
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Now that the odd client/server split (a remnant from the original
crypto/tls code not handling signing-hash/PRF mismatches) is gone, it
can just be pulled from the config.
Change-Id: Idb46c026d6529a2afc2b43d4afedc0aa950614db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8723
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Saves worrying about forgetting it. (And indeed I forgot it in the TLS
1.3 code.)
Change-Id: Ibb55a83eddba675da64b7cf2c45eac6348c97784
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8722
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This way we can test failing client auth without having to worry about
first getting through server auth.
Change-Id: Iaf996d87ac3df702a17e76c26006ca9b2a5bdd1f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8721
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Rebased and tests added by davidben.]
In doing so, regenerate the test RSA certificate to be 2048-bit RSA.
RSA-PSS with SHA-512 is actually too large for 1024-bit RSA. Also make
the sigalg test loop test versions that do and don't work which subsumes
the ecdsa_sha1 TLS 1.3 test.
For now, RSA-PKCS1 is still allowed because NSS has yet to implement
RSA-PSS and we'd like to avoid complicated interop testing.
Change-Id: I686b003ef7042ff757bdaab8d5838b7a4d6edd87
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8613
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Of course, it's still signing ServerKeyExchange messages since the
handshake's the old one.)
Change-Id: I35844a329d983f61ed0b5be20b333487406fe7e4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8614
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Implement in both C and Go. To test this, route config into all the
sign.go functions so we can expose bugs to skip the check.
Unfortunately, custom private keys are going to be a little weird since
we can't check their curve type. We may need to muse on what to do here.
Perhaps the key type bit should return an enum that includes the curve?
It's weird because, going forward, hopefully all new key types have
exactly one kind of signature so key type == sig alg == sig alg prefs.
Change-Id: I1f487ec143512ead931e3392e8be2a3172abe3d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8701
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
That instead happens via signature algorithms, which will be done in a
follow-up commit.
Change-Id: I97bc4646319dddbff62552244b0dd7e9bb2650ef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8700
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This is in preparation for TLS 1.3 enforcing curve matches in signature
algorithms.
Change-Id: I82c3a1862703a15e4e36ceb7ec40e27235b620c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8699
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
{sha256,ecdsa} should not be silently accepted for an RSA key.
Change-Id: I0c0eea5071f7a59f2707ca0ea023a16cc4126d6a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8697
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.3 also forbids signing SHA-1 digests, but this will be done as a
consequence of forbidding PKCS#1 in 1.3 altogether (rsa_sign_sha1) and
requiring a curve match in ECDSA (ecdsa_sha1).
Change-Id: I665971139ccef9e270fd5796c5e6a814a8f663b1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8696
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Rather than blindly select SHA-1 if we can't find a matching one, act as
if the peer advertised rsa_pkcs1_sha1 and ecdsa_sha1. This means that we
will fail the handshake if no common algorithm may be found.
This is done in preparation for removing the SHA-1 default in TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: I3584947909d3d6988b940f9404044cace265b20d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8695
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
For when the PackHandshakeFlight tests get enabled.
Change-Id: Iee20fd27d88ed58f59af3b7e2dd92235d35af9ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8663
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We currently have the situation where the |tool| and |bssl_shim| code
includes scoped_types.h from crypto/test and ssl/test. That's weird and
shouldn't happen. Also, our C++ consumers might quite like to have
access to the scoped types.
Thus this change moves some of the template code to base.h and puts it
all in a |bssl| namespace to prepare for scattering these types into
their respective headers. In order that all the existing test code be
able to access these types, it's all moved into the same namespace.
Change-Id: I3207e29474dc5fcc344ace43119df26dae04eabb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since they include an ECDHE exchange in them, they are equally-well
suited to False Start.
Change-Id: I75d31493a614a78ccbf337574c359271831d654d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8732
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, revised by davidben.]
When we add this in the real code, this will want ample tests and hooks
for bugs, but get the core logic in to start with.
Change-Id: I86cf0b6416c9077dbb6471a1802ae984b8fa6c72
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8598
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.3 will use a different function from processClientHello.
Change-Id: I8b26a601cf553834b508feab051927d5986091ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8597
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
As with the client, the logic around extensions in 1.3 will want to be
tweaked. readClientHello will probably shrink a bit. (We could probably
stuff 1.3 into the existing parameter negotiation logic, but I expect
it'll get a bit unwieldy once HelloRetryRequest, PSK resumption, and
0-RTT get in there, so I think it's best we leave them separate.)
Change-Id: Id8c323a06a1def6857a59accd9f87fb0b088385a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8596
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
While the random connection property extensions like ALPN and SRTP
remain largely unchanged in TLS 1.3 (but for interaction with 0-RTT),
authentication-related extensions change significantly and need
dedicated logic.
Change-Id: I2588935c2563a22e9879fb81478b8df5168b43de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8602
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Test with and without PackHandshakeFlight enabled to cover when the
early post-CCS fragment will get packed into one of the pre-CCS
handshake records. Also test the resumption cases too to cover more
state transitions.
The various CCS-related tests (since CCS is kind of a mess) are pulled
into their own group.
Change-Id: I6384f2fb28d9885cd2b06d59e765e080e3822d8a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8661
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper and then revised by davidben.]
Most features are missing, but it works for a start. To avoid breaking
the fake TLS 1.3 tests while the C code is still not landed, all the
logic is gated on a global boolean. When the C code gets in, we'll
set it to true and remove this boolean.
Change-Id: I6b3a369890864c26203fc9cda37c8250024ce91b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8601
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I'm surprised we'd never tested this. In addition to splitting handshake
records up, one may pack multiple handshakes into a single record, as
they fit. Generalize the DTLS handshake flush hook to do this in TLS as
well.
Change-Id: Ia546d18c7c56ba45e50f489c5b53e1fcd6404f51
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8650
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.2 and 1.3 will process more-or-less the same server extensions,
but at slightly different points in the handshake. In preparation for
that, split this out into its own function.
Change-Id: I5494dee4724295794dfd13c5e9f9f83eade6b20a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8586
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, tweaked by davidben.]
For now, ignore them completely.
Change-Id: I28602f219d210a857aa80d6e735557b8d2d1c590
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8585
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
