These will be used to test the C implementation.
BUG=187
Change-Id: If397eaa51885c8140a63c5f731ce58a8ad6949aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14452
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=76
Change-Id: Ie894ea5d327f88e66b234767de437dbe5c67c41d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12960
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=76
Change-Id: I43672ee82a50f8fe706a5d607ef774a6e96db252
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14379
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Once 0-RTT data is added to the current 0-RTT logic, the server will
trigger a write when processing incoming data via SSL_read. This means
SSL_read will block on transport write, which is something we've not
tried to avoid far (assuming no renegotiation).
The specification allows for tickets to be sent at half-RTT by
predicting the client Finished. By doing this we both get the tickets on
the wire sooner and avoid confusing I/O patterns. Moreover, we
anticipate we will need this mode for one of the QUIC stateless reject
patterns.
This is tested by always processing NewSessionTickets in the
ExpectHalfRTTData path on 0-RTT connections. As not other
implementations using BoGo may not do this, this is configurable via the
shim config.
BUG=76
Change-Id: Ia0f56ae63f15078ff1cacceba972d2b99001947f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14371
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This adds support on the server and client to accept data-less early
data. The server will still fail to parse early data with any
contents, so this should remain disabled.
BUG=76
Change-Id: Id85d192d8e0360b8de4b6971511b5e8a0e8012f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12921
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We'll measure this value to guide what tolerance to use in the 0-RTT
anti-replay mechanism. This also fixes a bug where we were previously
minting ticket_age_add-less tickets on the server. Add a check to reject
all those tickets.
BUG=113
Change-Id: I68e690c0794234234e0d0500b4b9a7f79aea641e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14068
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Due to middlebox and ecosystem intolerance, short record headers are going to
be unsustainable to deploy.
BUG=119
Change-Id: I20fee79dd85bff229eafc6aeb72e4f33cac96d82
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14044
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
In honor of CVE-2016-9244. Although that particular bug BoGo was already
testing since it uses 16 bytes here.
The empty session ID case is particularly worth testing to make sure we
don't get confused somewhere. RFC 5077 allows clients to offer tickets
with no session ID. This is absurd since the client then has no way of
detecting resumption except by lookahead. We'll never do this as a
client, but should handle it correctly as a server.
Change-Id: I49695d19f03c4efdef43749c07372d590a010cda
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13740
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The Go side (thankfully not the C side) was not fully updated for the
exporter secret derivation being earlier at some point. Also TLS 1.2
upgrades the PRF hash for pre-1.2 ciphers to SHA-256, so make sure we
cover that.
Change-Id: Ibdf50ef500e7e48a52799ac75577822bc304a613
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13663
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I38cd04fa40edde4e4dd31fdc16bbf92985430198
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12702
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I44202457841f06a899e140f78ae8afa7ac720283
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12600
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
As long as we still have this code, we should make sure it doesn't
regress.
Change-Id: I0290792aedcf667ec49b251d747ffbc141c0cec4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13053
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Upstream accidentally started rejecting server-sent point formats in
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/2133. Our own test coverage
here is also lacking, so flesh it out.
Change-Id: I99059558bd28d3a540c9687649d6db7e16579d29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12979
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This extension will be used to test whether
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/762 is deployable against
middleboxes. For simplicity, it is mutually exclusive with 0-RTT. If
client and server agree on the extension, TLS 1.3 records will use the
format in the PR rather than what is in draft 18.
BUG=119
Change-Id: I1372ddf7b328ddf73d496df54ac03a95ede961e1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12684
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
finishedHash should keep a running secret and incorporate entropy as is
available.
Change-Id: I2d245897e7520b2317bc0051fa4d821c32eeaa10
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12586
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Although we ignore all but the first identity, keep clients honest by
parsing the whole thing. Also explicitly check that the binder and
identity counts match.
Change-Id: Ib9c4caae18398360f3b80f8db1b22d4549bd5746
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12469
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=101
Change-Id: Ia1edbccee535b0bc3a0e18465286d5bcca240035
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12470
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Draft 18 sadly loosens the requirements to only requiring the PRF hash
stay fixed.
BUG=117
Change-Id: Ic94d53fd9cabaee611fcf36b0071558075e10728
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12310
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The draft 18 implementation did not compute scts_requested correctly. As
a result, it always believed SCTs were requested. Fix this and add tests
for unsolicited OCSP responses and SCTs at all versions.
Thanks to Daniel Hirche for the report.
Change-Id: Ifc59c5c4d7edba5703fa485c6c7a4055b15954b4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12305
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Having that logic in two different places is a nuisance when we go to
add new checks like resumption stuff. Along the way, this adds missing
tests for the ClientHello cipher/session consistency check. (We'll
eventually get it for free once the cipher/resumption change is
unblocked, but get this working in the meantime.)
This also fixes a bug where the session validity checks happened in the
wrong order relative to whether tickets_supported or renew_ticket was
looked at. Fix that by lifting that logic closer to the handshake.
Change-Id: I3f4b59cfe01064f9125277dc5834e62a36e64aae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12230
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was removed a while ago. As of -18, the early data indication
extension is just a boolean.
Change-Id: I328b9abfafad326d4c2a3b5fe981af111f8401ad
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12302
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
3c6a1ea674 switched what layer handled
the DTLS version mapping but forgot to correct the HelloVerifyRequest
logic to account for this.
Thanks to Jed Davis for noticing this.
Change-Id: I94ea18fc43a7ba15dd7250bfbcf44dbb3361b3ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11984
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The existing tests for this codepath require us to reconfigure the shim.
This will not work when TLS 1.3 cipher configuration is detached from
the old cipher language. It also doesn't hit codepaths like sessions
containing a TLS 1.3 version but TLS 1.2 cipher.
Instead, add some logic to the runner to rewrite tickets and build tests
out of that.
Change-Id: I57ac5d49c3069497ed9aaf430afc65c631014bf6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12024
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=103
Change-Id: I9a49fbaf66af73978ce264d27926f483e1e44766
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11620
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Channel ID for TLS 1.3 uses the same digest construction as
CertificateVerify. This message is signed with the Channel ID key and
put in the same handshake message (with the same format) as in TLS 1.2.
BUG=103
Change-Id: Ia5b2dffe5a39c39db0cecb0aa6bdc328e53accc2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11420
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This should land in the same group of revisions as the two parent
commits.
Change-Id: Id9d769b890b3308ea70b705e7241c73cb1930ede
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11581
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We'll never send cookies, but we'll echo them on request. Implement it
in runner as well and test.
BUG=98
Change-Id: Idd3799f1eaccd52ac42f5e2e5ae07c209318c270
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11565
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This doesn't currently honor the required KeyUpdate response. That will
be done in a follow-up.
BUG=74
Change-Id: I750fc41278736cb24230303815e839c6f6967b6a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11412
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BUG=77
Change-Id: If568412655aae240b072c29d763a5b17bb5ca3f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10840
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BUG=77
Change-Id: Id8c45e98c4c22cdd437cbba1e9375239e123b261
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10763
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
EnableAllCiphers is problematic since some (version, cipher)
combinations aren't even defined and crash. Instead, use the
SendCipherSuite bug to mask the true cipher (which is becomes arbitrary)
for failure tests. The shim should fail long before we get further.
This lets us remove a number of weird checks in the TLS 1.3 code.
This also fixes the UnknownCipher tests which weren't actually testing
anything. EnableAllCiphers is now AdvertiseAllConfiguredCiphers and
does not filter out garbage values.
Change-Id: I7102fa893146bb0d096739e768c5a7aa339e51a8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11481
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I73f9fd64b46f26978b897409d817b34ec9d93afd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11080
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This mirror's 2dc0204603 on the C side.
BUG=90
Change-Id: Iebb72df5a5ae98cb2fd8db519d973cd734ff05ea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11320
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is in preparation for implementing the version extension and is
probably what we should have done from the beginning as it makes
intolerance bugs simpler.
This means knobs like SendClientVersion and SendServerVersion deal with
the wire values while knobs like NegotiateVersion and MaxVersion deal
with logical versions. (This matches how the bugs have always worked.
SendFoo is just a weird post-processing bit on the handshake messages
while NegotiateVersion actually changes how BoGo behaves.)
BUG=90
Change-Id: I7f359d798d0899fa2742107fb3d854be19e731a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11300
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Apparently we never wrote one of those. Also send a decrypt_error alert
to be consistent with all the other signature checks.
Change-Id: Ib5624d098d1e3086245192cdce92f5df26005064
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11180
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Found by libFuzzer and then one more mistake caught by valgrind. Add a
test for this case.
Change-Id: I92773bc1231bafe5fc069e8568d93ac0df4c8acb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11129
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Not that this matters in the slightest, but the recent IETF mailing
reminded me we don't test this.
Change-Id: I300c96d6a63733d538a7019a7cb74d4e65d0498f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10961
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Changing parameters on renegotiation makes all our APIs confusing. This
one has no reason to change, so lock it down. In particular, our
preference to forbid Token Binding + renego may be overridden at the
IETF, even though it's insane. Loosening it will be a bit less of a
headache if EMS can't change.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/unbearable/current/msg00690.html
claims that this is already in the specification and enforced by NSS. I
can't find anything to this effect in the specification. It just says
the client MUST disable renegotiation when EMS is missing, which is
wishful thinking. At a glance, NSS doesn't seem to check, though I could
be misunderstanding the code.
Nonetheless, locking this down is a good idea anyway. Accurate or not,
take the email as an implicit endorsement of this from Mozilla.
Change-Id: I236b05991d28bed199763dcf2f47bbfb9d0322d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10721
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
In TLS 1.3 draft 14, due to resumption using a different cipher, this
is actually not too hard to mess up. (In fact BoGo didn't quite get it
right.)
Fortunately, the new cipher suite negotiation in draft 15 should make
this reasonable again once we implement it. In the meantime, test it.
Change-Id: I2eb948eeaaa051ecacaa9095b66ff149582ea11d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10442
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
One less thing to keep track of.
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/549 got merged.
Change-Id: Ide66e547140f8122a3b8013281be5215c11b6de0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10482
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Some version mismatch cases were not being covered due to TLS 1.2 and
TLS 1.3 having very different spellings for tickets resumption. Also
explicitly test that TLS 1.2 tickets aren't offered in the TLS 1.3 slot
and vice versa.
Change-Id: Ibe58386ea2004fb3c1af19342b8d808f13f737a9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10183
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Much of the ClientHello logic queries hello.vers. To avoid it getting
confused, do all modifications right at the end, otherwise
SendClientVersion also affects whether the key share is sent.
Change-Id: I8be2a4a9807ef9ad88af03971ea1c37e4ba36b9c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10341
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I998f69269cdf813da19ccccc208b476f3501c8c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8991
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is in preparation for switching finish_handshake to a
release_current_message hook. finish_handshake in DTLS is also
responsible for releasing any memory associated with extra messages in
the handshake.
Except that's not right and we need to make it an error anyway. Given
that the rest of the DTLS dispatch layer already strongly assumes there
is only one message in epoch one, putting the check in the fragment
processing works fine enough. Add tests for this.
This will certainly need revising when DTLS 1.3 happens (perhaps just a
version check, perhaps bringing finish_handshake back as a function that
can fail... which means we need a state just before SSL_ST_OK), but DTLS
1.3 post-handshake messages haven't really been written down, so let's
do the easy thing for now and add a test for when it gets more
interesting.
This removes the sequence number reset in the DTLS code. That reset
never did anything becase we don't and never will renego. We should make
sure DTLS 1.3 does not bring the reset back for post-handshake stuff.
(It was wrong in 1.2 too. Penultimate-flight retransmits and renego
requests are ambiguous in DTLS.)
BUG=83
Change-Id: I33d645a8550f73e74606030b9815fdac0c9fb682
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8988
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Implemented in preparation for testing the C implementation. Tested
against itself.
BUG=74
Change-Id: Iec1b9ad22e09711fa4e67c97cc3eb257585c3ae5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8873
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We still don't do anything useful with them, but we know not to put them
in the session ticket field.
In doing so, fix a bug in the CorruptTicket option where it would crash
if tickets are exactly 40 byets in length.
BUG=75
Change-Id: Id1039a58ed314a67d0af4f2c7e0617987c2bd6b5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8872
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
[Tests added by davidben.]
Change-Id: I0d54a4f8b8fe91b348ff22658d95340cdb48b089
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8850
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
